Neuroscience Student Handbook
Page 31
summary leer to the DGS. The Program Representave will parcipate in quesoning the student,
parcularly in fundamental knowledge of neuroscience, since they should be familiar with the
material taught in the required courses. The Qualifying Exam meeng should last approximately
two hours, including the oral exam and closed discussions. The Qualifying Exam comprises two
parts: wrien proposal and oral exam. The commiee confers in the student's absence at the start
of the meeng, at which me the commiee reviews the student’s performance in classes (based
on grades provided by the Program Coordinator) and discusses the scoring of the wrien proposal
(the wrien part will already have been approved as acceptable prior to the meeng). Criteria for
assessing the document include (but are not limited to) the following: sciencally sound, logical,
sucient background/review of eld, well-organized, clearly wrien, proper grammar/spelling.
The Program Representave polls each member to reach a consensus on a score. The student will
then return to the commiee and begin their oral defense of the proposal. The examinaon
begins with the student giving no more than a 5-minute overview of the topic of their review and
specic aims, followed by quesons from the faculty designed to evaluate the student's general
knowledge, ability to integrate didacc informaon into research design, capacity to connect and
synthesize interrelated ideas and ability to think clearly and crically. The exam should take
approximately 2 hours, but the exact me is at the discreon of the commiee. Prior to the
meeng, commiee members will receive a list of topics the student is expected to be familiar
with from coursework (this document will be formed from the syllabi from NURO 340 and 345).
The examiners are also free to queson the student about the content taught in other courses that
they’ve taken or knowledge relevant to the student’s area of research. Commiee members will
prepare in advance for the meeng by reading the review and specic aims and idenfying several
lines of quesoning (on both the review itself and general background) to pursue during the oral
exam. All commiee members should acvely parcipate in quesoning the student. Although a
wide variety of quesons may be deemed appropriate during the oral exam, the commiee's focus
should be to ascertain whether the student has established a crical knowledge base essenal for
understanding his/her research project and achieving success as he/she progresses through
graduate school. It is the Program Representave’s responsibility to keep everyone "on track" (in
terms of me, lines of quesoning, and overall direcon) during the oral exam. Upon conclusion of
the oral exam, the commiee confers in the student's absence to evaluate the student's
performance. The Program Representave polls each member to reach a consensus as to whether
the student passed or failed the exam. A condional pass is a possible outcome with condions to
be established by the commiee. Two forms will be completed by the Program Representave,
one for the Neuroscience Program and one for the graduate school. The Program Representave
will then inform the student of the results and go over in detail the commiee’s evaluaon. It
should be noted that both the Neuroscience program and the graduate school allow a student to
repeat the examinaon should the student fail the rst examinaon. Both the student's wrien
document and performance during the oral exam must be deemed sasfactory by all commiee
members. The wrien document must be approved before the oral exam. Inadequate
performance by the student in the oral exam is grounds for failure and will necessitate a second
oral exam and/or addional remediaon (within 90 days). In such cases, it is the Program
Representave’s responsibility to delineate (with input from the commiee) what remedial steps
are most appropriate for a parcular student and how the commiee will evaluate the student a
second me. Examples of remediaon used successfully in the past include the following: provide