Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
1
Sport Participation Measurement
Background Paper on Taking Part and Active People Survey
Integration
May 2012
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
3
Contents
Introduction .......................................................................................................... 4
Background on Taking Part and Active People surveys ....................................... 5
National Statistics Context ................................................................................... 6
Nat Cen Review ................................................................................................... 7
Measurement Priorities for Government and the Public Sector ............................ 8
Scope and Framework of Changes ...................................................................... 9
Value for Money and Quality .............................................................................. 10
Coverage ........................................................................................................... 12
The Need for Local Authority Estimates ............................................................. 14
Use of Modelled Estimates ................................................................................ 15
References ........................................................................................................ 16
Summary of Taking Part and Active People Surveys ......................................... 17
Key Terms and Definitions ................................................................................. 19
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
4
Introduction
This document provides further background information about the existing Taking
Part (TP) and Active People (APS) surveys and sets out the reasons for the
proposed changes in more detail.
In addition, to inform the decision-making process, DCMS and Sport England
(SE) commissioned the ONS Methodology Advisory Service to take an
independent look at the way forward we are proposing. The report Discussion of
options for Taking Part and Active People Survey Integration” from the ONS
Methodology Advisory Service is a discussion of possible options for integrating
the TP and APS, written to inform this consultation and provides further guidance
and detail on the statistical issues involved. It is available to download on the
sport participation measurement consultation page of the DCMS and SE
websites.
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
5
Background on Taking Part and Active
People surveys
TP is a face-to-face survey covering a range of cross-cultural and sport questions
which measure public engagement and participation in the arts and sport in
England. TP is managed by the DCMS Evidence and Analysis Unit and the
survey is funded by DCMS, English Heritage, Arts Council England and SE.
TP is a National Statistic and has an annual sample size of around 10,000, which
allows for robust estimates at a national and regional level. For the 8
th
year of
collection, 2011/12, TP has introduced a longitudinal element to the survey; there
will be a fresh sample of 5,000 with 5,000 interviews followed up from the
previous year.
APS is a large telephone survey (sample size around 165,000) which currently
focuses on sports participation and physical activity only, within England. The
sample size is large enough to be able to robustly measure lower participation
sports at the national level as well as providing headline sports measures at the
Local Authority District level. The APS has, in the past, been boosted to provide
local authority measures of cultural participation (for National Indicators) but this
local cultural measurement is no longer a requirement.
The latest issue, year 6 of APS (APS6) contains a face-to-face survey element
(6,000 households) to understand the modal effects of the random digit dialling
telephone survey method employed. The face-to-face element also allows
additional in-depth questions to be asked around levers and barriers to
participation.
Both surveys interview adults aged 16 and over. TP only contains a child element
to the survey and for each household, together with one adult interview, the
survey includes, one child per household aged 11-15 and one child per
household aged 5-10 (interviewed by proxy via the adult).
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
6
National Statistics Context
Both surveys are governed by the Code of Practice for Official Statistics,
compliance with which falls within the responsibility and oversight of the DCMS
Head of Profession for Statistics. SE is an Arm’s Length Body (ALB) of DCMS
and named as a producer of official statistics.
DCMS and the TP survey have recently been assessed by the UK Statistics
Authority and the Taking Part survey has retained National Statistics status,
subject to implementing 16 requirements of the Authority. Although relationships
between DCMS and its ALBs including SE were discussed within the
assessment, the APS (an official statistic) was out of scope.
However, the Statistics Authority is aware of the collaborative project between
DCMS and SE to address the duplication of sport questions and to resolve the
issue of coherence between sports estimates provided by each of the two
surveys; these issues were raised by stakeholders during the assessment
process. Similarly, the National Statistician’s Office is also aware of this
consultation.
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
7
Nat Cen Review
In August 2010 NatCen published an independent review of the TP and APS
surveys; this review was commissioned by DCMS and SE as stated in the review:
“The aim of the review was to scope the options for collecting national and local
level data on participation in culture and sport, and to consider how the two
surveys might be merged or modified in order to reduce costs, while still meeting
the requirements of stakeholders.”
This review has provided a good starting point for options considered in this
consultation, however both surveys have moved on since this review; TP has
been redesigned to include a longitudinal element (partly as a result of the
review) and APS now includes a face-to-face element.
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
8
Measurement Priorities for Government
and the Public Sector
SE will invest over £1 billion of National Lottery and Exchequer funding between
2012 and 2017 in organisations and fund a wide range of NGBs. Survey
evidence is intended to form a part of SE’s “payment by results” system for
allocation of funding.
Local Authorities are key users of sports data spending approximately £1.9 billion
per year on sport and recreation.
1
The following have been identified as the policy measurement requirements
identified by DCMS and SE and support measurement ofCreating a sporting
habit for life - A new youth sport strategy”:
1. Measure the proportion aged 14 years and over undertaking at least one 30
minute session of moderate intensity sport each week
2. Measure participation of children taking part in competitive sport
3. Measurement to capture a required overall consistent annual increase in
participation across all age ranges but with a particular focus on 14-25 year old
age group at a national level
4. Measure and track change for the most popular 30 sports to inform National
Governing Bodies of sport (NGB) performance management (the top 30 sports
account for around 80% of total funding).
5. Measure and track change at a local authority district level.
Related to requirement 4 is the issue of National Governing Bodies of Sport
(NGB) accountability and payment by results. The revised survey will be central
to performance management of NGBs and this will be supplemented by other
success measures (including self-reported information), agreed with the NGBs,
as part of the Payment by Results regime.
1
Based on CLG data for 2010/11 outturn at
http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/corporate/statistics/revenue201011fi
naloutturn (revenue) and
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/statistics/doc/20134611.doc (capital)
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
9
Scope and Framework of Changes
As well as meeting the measurement requirements for DCMS and SE (detailed
on page 8) and continuing to meet the requirements of key users, proposed
survey changes are framed in terms of which options provide best value for
money and quality i.e. how they meet:
Principle 7 Resources, Practice 5 of the Code of Practice for Official Statistics
“Seek to balance quality (for example, accuracy and timeliness) against costs
(including both costs to government and data suppliers), taking into account the
expected uses of the statistics”.
Principle 1 (Meeting user needs) of the Code of Practice for Official Statistics
states that the “production, management and dissemination of official statistics
should meet the requirements of informed decision-making by government”.
While we are proposing changes DCMS and SE are:
1. Committed to retaining the cross-cutting nature of the TP survey, covering the
needs of the cultural sectors.
2. Committed to meeting the user requirements for sports measurement which
the APS provides. These relate to measurement of individual sports,
performance management of National Governing Bodies of sport (NGB) and
local measurement of sports participation and physical activity.
3. Committed to providing continuity in the data and with the substantial evidence
base the TP and APS provide.
4. Keen to pursue on-going improvements, for example the longitudinal element
to the TP survey and the introduction of a face-to-face element to the APS.
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
10
Value for Money and Quality
Alongside the costs of any options for combining both surveys there needs to be
consideration of value for money and quality. Face-to-face interviews (at around
£100 per interview) are around eight times more expensive than landline
telephone interviews, but provide good quality information, terms can be
explained clearly and with the use of visual aids ‘show-cards’, which help
respondents choose from long lists (for example lists of sports). The response
rate for Taking Part is around 65%.
Telephone surveys are lower cost (around £12-per interview) and can provide
much larger samples sizes but may have low response rates (around 28% for
APS) and for APS only cover households with fixed-lines. Around 15% of UK
households are mobile only.
Our aim is to use both face-to-face and fixed-line telephone survey results for
sports participation together (a ‘mixed-mode’ approach); this approach draws on
the strength and quality of face-to-face interviews, but allows for a large sample
of telephone interviews to be obtained within the costs available.
The APS is currently undertaking a face-to-face ‘parallel’ study which compares
the differences in responses to face-to-face interviews and telephone interviews
and is important in assessing a way forward for integrating TP and APS into a
single survey.
The outcome of this study will inform the detailed method of how face-to-face and
landline results can be combined. The study will show how well telephone
responses match face-to-face interviews and, depending on the extent of the
differences, how these can be accounted for in weighting or calibration of results.
The study runs over 4 quarters from October 2011 to October 2012, with the
results from the first quarter being available during June 2012.
We also intend to investigate digital data collection methods (mobile and online),
with a view to integrating results from these additional modes over the medium
term (subject to pilot results).
Introducing online data collection has the potential to provide efficiencies as this
method is considerably lower cost than landline telephone or face to face data
collection. Our intention would be to follow-up on respondents who have already
been interviewed as part of the face to face survey and have agreed that they
can be re-contacted.
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
11
Building up a panel of online respondents in this way is a gradual process but the
intention would be, if the data is of sufficient quality, to replace part of the landline
telephone sample with the online component, maintaining the overall total sample
size. This approach would need to be successfully piloted before inclusion.
Collection of data by mobile telephone can potentially increase the coverage of
fixed-line telephone surveys. However the quality of mobile telephone interviews
can be low. There are scenarios where mobile data collection may add to
coverage, but the method can be high cost and its value needs to be assessed
against other strategies. Piloting this approach would need to show good
evidence that the data collected is of sufficient quality and that there is a robust
method to include results alongside other types of data collection.
A trial of mobile phone data collection has been carried out for the APS, and the
results of this would inform the implementation of a mobile phone pilot.
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
12
Coverage
It is important for any household survey to fully represent the population by
providing as wide a coverage of the population as possible; it is particularly
important that a sports participation survey captures people who may spend
much of their time outside the home playing sport or exercising.
A face-to-face survey approach (used in the Taking Part survey) provides full
coverage of households; however institutional addresses (for example, armed
forces barracks, student halls of residence, hospitals, care homes) are currently
excluded for practical reasons. To reduce potential response bias against people
who spend less time at home a minimum of 8 visits to households are made at
varying times across the day and at the weekend.
A fixed line survey approach (taken in the APS) will not cover mobile only
households (currently 15% of UK households). Mobile households tend to be
more common amongst younger and lower socio-economic groups. While
younger people have higher rates of sports participation those in lower socio-
economic groups have lower participation; investigation by SE has shown that
the exclusion of mobile only households has only a small effect on survey results
and can be largely overcome by weighting. APS also follows a thorough non-
response strategy, with households phoned at least 40 times before being
dropped from the sample.
Household penetration of fixed and mobile telephony (UK): Ofcom
Communications Market Report: UK, August 2011.
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
13
In this consultation we are also proposing piloting digital data collection methods
(mobile and online), with a view to integrating results from these additional
modes over the medium term (subject to pilot results). These collection methods
provide additional channels of communication, but also present challenges in
how results can be integrated within robust estimates. A more detailed
discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of these methods is provided in
the paper Discussion of options for Taking Part and Active People Survey
Integration” from the ONS Methodology Advisory Service. This can be
downloaded from the consultation page of the DCMS and Sport England
websites.
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
14
The Need for Local Authority Estimates
Estimates of sports participation at a Local Authority District level are important to
SE and local government partners in measuring participation at a local level.
Local authorities use this data to plan and protect local provision and spending of
approximately £1.9 billion per year on sport and recreation.
Local Authority measurement is also key for the Department of Health who
currently fund APS questions. The Department of Health have stated that they
(and Local Authorities) require this information to understand the extent of
progress being made in the level of sport and physical activity amongst adults as
a result of local interventions as well as self-reported height and weight.
The availability of Local Authority estimates allows the Department of Health to
include measures of physical activity and height and weight in their Public Health
Outcomes Framework.
The measures outlined in the framework are the “Proportion of physically active
and inactive adults” and the “Proportion of adults classified as overweight or
obese”. B
oth are planned to be taken from the APS. The Public Health
Outcomes Framework is planning to publish data at Upper Tier Local Authority
level, however Local Authorities are very likely to require the indicators at the
lower Local Authority District level.
The Department of Transport also contribute to the APS and use local data for
walking or cycling to work to support their policy objectives.
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
15
Use of Modelled Estimates
A face-to-face only option would require modelling to provide estimates for local
authority districts and for lower participation sports as the sample size required
for direct estimation would not be sufficient unless the sample was increased
substantially beyond what current resources allow.
Modelling also has the potential to improve estimates within mixed-mode options
where the sample size is already substantial enough for direct estimation.
However, accountability arrangements mean that SE and the Department of
Health have a requirement to directly measure participation in individual sports.
Similarly SE and the Department of Health strongly favour sports participation
estimates which account for local interventions and initiatives. Modelling will
provide estimates for e.g. “a sport like badminton” or “a borough like Lambeth”
and is therefore less suited to measuring change with confidence than direct
measurement.
Small area estimation (modelling) has been undertaken by SE for descriptive
purposes and considered in the past for the Taking Part survey, but not
implemented. There is no clear method, however, for modelling sports
participation.
A more detailed discussion of modelling is provided in the paper Discussion of
options for Taking Part and Active People Survey Integration” from the ONS
Methodology Advisory Service. This can be downloaded from the consultation
page of the DCMS and Sport England
websites.
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
16
References
Code of Practice for official statistics:
http://www.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/assessment/code-of-practice
UK Statistics Authority Assessment of DCMS and Taking Part
http://www.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/assessment/assessment/assessment-
reports/index.html
Active People Survey
http://www.sportengland.org/research/active_people_survey.aspx
Taking Part
http://www.dcms.gov.uk/what_we_do/research_and_statistics/4828.aspx
NatCen review. Taking Part and Active People Surveys: an independent review:
http://www.dcms.gov.uk/images/research/TP_InpendReview_of_APTP.pdf
Recognised National Governing Bodies of Sport
http://www.sportengland.org/about_us/recogition_of_sports_and_ngbs.aspx
Ofcom, The Communications Market Report: United Kingdom
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/market-
data/communications-market-reports/cmr11/uk/
The Application of Alternative Modes of Data Collection in UK Government Social
Surveys
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/about-ons/who-we-are/services/data-
collection-methodology/reports-and-publications/alternative-modes-of-data-
collection/index.html
Department of Health Public health outcomes framework
http://www.dh.gov.uk/health/2012/01/public-health-outcomes/
Public health outcomes framework: Summary technical specifications (see page
38 2.13 Proportion of physically active and inactive adults)
http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicy
AndGuidance/DH_132358
DCMS: Creating a sporting habit for life - A new youth sport strategy
http://www.culture.gov.uk/publications/8761.aspx
Sport England strategy 2012-17
http://www.sportengland.org/about_us/what_we_do.aspx
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
17
Summary of Taking Part and Active
People Surveys
Taking Part Survey
Active People Survey
Type of
Survey
Face-to-face household interview Telephone Survey, with 6,000
face-to-face sample household
survey element from APS6.
Sample
Frame
Adults aged 16 and over living in private
households in England.
A child interview was added to the survey in
January 2006, interviewing a randomly selected
child in those households containing at least one
child aged 11-15. In 2008/09, the child survey was
broadened to include children aged 5-10.
The sample universe
comprised all individuals aged
16+ living in England with a
landline.
Random Digit Dialling (RDD)
was used in the selection of the
sample with one respondent
randomly selected from the
eligible household members.
Response
Rate
Around 64% Around 28%
Continuous
Yes
Yes
Geographic
Coverage
England England
Sample Size Currently 10,000 face-to-face Currently 165,000 telephone.
6000 face-to-face element has
recently been introduced.
Interview
Length
The median adult sample interview length was 40
minutes. The median survey length for the 5-10
year old child interview was 14 minutes and for 11-
15 year olds it was 24 minutes.
15-20 minute average for the
telephone survey
Survey
Contents
Free time activities
Child engagement
The influence of childhood participation on adult
participation
Sport and active recreation
Attendance Satisfaction
Attitudes to the 2012 Games
Digital engagement
The big society (charitable giving/volunteering/civic
participation
Cycling and swimming proficiency
Archives
Participation in culture
Walking and cycling
Sport participation
Volunteer in sport on a weekly
basis
Club membership
Involvement in organised
sport/competition
Receipt of tuition or coaching
Volunteering
Changes in sports participation
Dance and gardening
Height and weight
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
18
Longitudinal
Panel
Panel established from 2009/10, with follow up
each year until 2015
Potential future development.
Statistics
Badging
National Statistic Official Statistic
Purpose The survey collects a wide range of data about
engagement and non-engagement in culture,
leisure and sport as well as more diverse
measures that support a range of Government
objectives.
Taking Part is the key evidence source for DCMS,
providing reliable national estimates of participation
and supporting the Department’s aim of improving
the quality of life for everyone by providing people
with the chance to get involved in a variety of these
opportunities.
The survey also aims to support the DCMS
Structural Reform Priorities and Business Plan
through the provision of data for a DCMS impact
indicator.
The Primary objective of the
APS is to measure levels of
participation in sport and active
recreation.
APS is used to measure
performance of National
Governing Bodies for 31 of the
46 Organised sports funded by
SE.
APS also provides the
measurement for:
Local area estimates of adult
participation in sport and active
recreation (formerly NI8).
Department of Health Public
health outcomes framework
measures of physical activity
and height and weight
Lowest
Geographic
Level
Regional. Small area estimation would be needed
for Local Authority District estimates. Upper tier
local authority estimates can be provided by
combining years of data.
Local authority district
estimates (with minimum
sample size of 500 per LA per
year). Some local authority
estimates combine 2 years of
data.
Reporting
Cycle
Quarterly Every six months
Cost Approximate gross cost £1.38m per annum
(including co-funderscontributions from Sport
England, Arts Council England and English
Heritage)
Gross cost £3.1m (including
funding from the Department of
Health and the Department for
Transport)
Survey
contractors
TNS-BMRB TNS-BMRB
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
19
Key Terms and Definitions
Term
Definition
1 x 30 minute MIS
This refers to a person participating in moderate intensity sport
for at least one 30 minute session in the last week (including
recreational walking and cycling).
3 x 30 minute MIS
This refers to a person participating in moderate intensity sport
for at least three 30 minute sessions in the last week (including
recreational walking and cycling).
Active sport at least once in the
last 4 weeks
The number of days in the last four weeks the respondent has
done at least one of the active sports or activities for at least 30
minutes. This excludes any walking or cycling the respondent
has done for health or recreation purposes only. Walking or
cycling for sport training or competition is included.
Active People Survey
A survey commissioned by Sport England to identify how
participation varies from place to place and between different
groups in the population.
The survey also measures; the proportion of the adult population
that volunteer in sport, club membership, involvement in
organised sport/competition, receipt of tuition or coaching, and
overall satisfaction with levels of sporting provision in the local
community.
Further details are available here
http://www.sportengland.org/research/active_people_survey.asp
x
Attendance
This refers to the respondent going to a place, for example,
attending a library or a swimming pool.
Confidence interval
This provides a range in which there is a specific probability that
the true value will lie within. For the TP and APS surveys, 95%
confidence intervals are used which means, had the sampling
been conducted 100 times, creating 100 confidence intervals,
then 95 of these intervals would contain the true value.
DCMS sectors
The DCMS sectors are the culture, arts, sports and big society
sectors.
Engagement
This refers to either attending and/or participating in the sport,
culture or arts sector. For example, if the respondent attended an
art gallery (attendance) or gave a dance performance
(participation).
Moderate intensity sport (MIS)
This is any active sport or recreational activity that is continuous,
raises a person’s heartbeat, makes them out of breath and
sweaty. This excludes utility walking or cycling, for example to
work, but does include recreational walking and cycling.
Sport England and Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Sport Participation Measurement
20
Term
Definition
Participation
This refers to the respondent actively taking part in the activity.
For example sports participation could refer to playing football or
tennis, whilst participating in the arts may refer to painting.
Significant increase/decrease
This means there is good evidence that the increase/decrease is
real and not due to chance.
Socio-demographic groups
Categorising the respondents by different social classes such as
age, gender, employment status, housing tenure, ethnicity,
religion, disability/illness status and National Statistics Socio-
Economic Classes (NS-SEC)
Taking Part Survey
A survey commissioned by the Department for Culture, Media
and Sport (DCMS) in partnership with the Arts Council England,
English Heritage and Sport England, looking at engagement and
non-engagement in culture, leisure and sport. Further
information is available at
http://www.culture.gov.uk/what_we_do/research_and_statistics/7
390.aspx