Supreme Court of Florida
____________
No. SC2023-0962
____________
IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE.
May 23, 2024
PER CURIAM.
The Florida Bar’s Civil Procedure Rules Committee filed a
report with two alternative proposals to codify active case
management in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.
1
We adopt a
combination of the Committee’s two alternatives with modifications
based on the comments filed in this case, the position of the
Committee’s minority, and an earlier proposal submitted by the
Workgroup on Improved Resolution of Civil Cases.
The amendments create a framework for the active case
management of civil cases with a focus on adhering to deadlines
established early based on the complexity of the case, while
1. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.; see
also Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.140(f).
- 2 -
providing room for customization by judicial circuit given the
varying levels of volume, resources, and available automation. Our
amendments also alter discovery by requiring certain initial
disclosures, by imposing a duty to supplement, and by requiring
that discovery be proportional to the needs of the case. The
amendments, which are intended to promote the fair and timely
resolution of civil cases, shall become effective January 1, 2025.
I. BACKGROUND
In 2019, Chief Justice Canady established the Workgroup on
Improved Resolution of Civil Cases within the Judicial Management
Council, explaining that “Florida’s judicial branch is committed to
continual improvement of the administration of justice, including
enhancement of civil case management processes in order to deliver
justice in a timely, cost-efficient, and accountable manner while
maintaining due process.” In re Workgroup on Improved Resolution
of Civil Cases, Admin. Order No. AOSC19-73 (Fla. Oct. 31, 2019).
The Workgroup was tasked with examining Florida’s “laws, rules of
court, and practices relating to civil procedure and case
management to determine whether changes can be made to improve
the resolution of civil cases.” Id.
- 3 -
The Workgroup submitted to the Court a report proposing
extensive amendments to multiple rulesets. The Workgroup’s
report explained that effective case management requires early
judicial intervention and adherence to established deadlines. After
holding oral argument, however, the Court declined to adopt the
Workgroup’s proposed amendments. Instead, the Court made
multiple referrals for the refinement and study of the Workgroup’s
proposal.
As part of these referrals, the Court tasked The Florida Bar’s
Civil Procedure Rules Committee with studying and refining certain
amendments proposed by the Workgroup for the Florida Rules of
Civil Procedure. In response, the Committee filed a report with two
alternative proposals. According to the Committee, the first option
was intended to implement the existing case management
requirements that were established by the Court in its COVID-19
administrative orders. The second option was intended to refine the
proposal submitted by the Workgroup.
A majority of the Committee voted in favor of recommending
the first option to the Court, and the Board of Governors voted to
recommend acceptance of the proposed amendments. The Court
- 4 -
published both alternatives for comment, and 55 comments were
received.
After holding oral argument and considering the various
proposals and comments as well as the Committee’s response, the
Court now adopts a modified combination of the two alternatives
proposed by the Committee.
II. AMENDMENTS
To codify active case management in the Florida Rules of Civil
Procedure, we amend Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.200 (Case
Management; Pretrial Procedure), 1.201 (Complex Litigation), 1.280
(General Provisions Governing Discovery), 1.440 (Setting Action for
Trial), and 1.460 (Motions to Continue Trial).
2
Rule 1.200 is rewritten entirely and provides that each civil
case must be assigned to one of three case management tracks
(complex, general, or streamlined) within 120 days. Under
rewritten rule 1.200, the chief judge of each judicial circuit is
required to enter an administrative order addressing certain case
2. These titles reflect the amended titles for rules 1.200 and
1.460.
- 5 -
management requirements. This approach allows each circuit to
customize the process that works best for that circuit given the
varying levels of volume, resources, and available automation. A
circuit is free to require parties to file proposed case management
orders, or a circuit may produce automated case management
orders, among other possible customizations.
Rewritten rule 1.200 provides that[i]n streamlined and
general cases, the court must issue a case management order that
specifies the projected or actual trial period based on the case track
assignment, consistent with administrative orders entered by the
chief judge of the circuit. The deadlines in the case management
order must be “differentiated based on whether the case is
streamlined or general” and “consistent with the time standards
specified in Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial
Administration 2.250(a)(1)(B),” and the order must include at least
eight specified deadlines.
Rewritten rule 1.200 includes a detailed procedure for
modifying the deadlines set forth in case management orders. It
states that deadlines in case management orders “must be strictly
enforced unless changed by court order.” But it allows parties to
- 6 -
“submit an agreed order to extend a deadline if the extension does
not affect the ability to comply with the remaining dates in the case
management order.” The rule further explains that parties’
requests for modifications of actual trial periods are governed by
rule 1.460. And “[i]f a trial is not reached during the trial period set
by court order, the court must enter an order setting a new trial
period that is as soon as practicable, given the needs of the case
and resources of the court.”
Rule 1.200 also includes new provisions regarding case
management conferences and pretrial conferences. A “court may
set case management conferences at any time on its own notice or
on proper notice by a party.” But “[i]f noticed by a party, the notice
itself must identify the specific issues to be addressed during the
case management conference and must also provide a list of all
pending motions.” The court may address any scheduling issues at
a case management conference and may, on reasonable notice to
the parties, address any pending motions other than motions for
summary judgment and motions requiring evidentiary hearings.
Complex cases proceed under rule 1.201, which we amend to
provide that a court may (but is not required to) hold a hearing to
- 7 -
determine whether a case should be designated as complex. We
also amend rule 1.201 to provide that “[t]he parties must notify the
court immediately if a case management conference or hearing time
becomes unnecessary” and to expressly state that motions for trial
continuances are governed by rule 1.460.
For rule 1.280, the Court incorporates into the scope of
discovery subdivision the proportionality language of Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1). Rule 1.280 is further amended to
require certain initial discovery disclosures “within 60 days after the
service of the complaint or joinder, unless a different time is set by
court order.” We also amend rule 1.280 to impose a duty to
supplement discovery.
Our amendments to rule 1.440 eliminate the “at issue”
requirement and instead provide that[t]he failure of the pleadings
to be closed will not preclude the court from setting a case for trial.”
In addition, rule 1.440 is amended to require the court to enter an
order fixing the trial period 45 days before any projected trial period
in a case management order.
Finally, the Court rewrites rule 1.460 entirely to provide that
“[m]otions to continue trial are disfavored and should rarely be
- 8 -
granted and then only upon good cause shown.” Rewritten rule
1.460 also sets forth requirements for what must be included in a
motion for a trial continuance and explains that, “[i]f a continuance
is granted based on the dilatory conduct of an attorney or named
party, the court may impose sanctions.”
III. CONCLUSION
Accordingly, the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure are amended
as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. New language is
underscored; deletions are in struck-through type. The
amendments shall become effective January 1, 2025, at 12:01 a.m.
Because the amendments we adopt today are substantially different
than either alternative submitted by the Committee, interested
persons have 75 days from the date of this opinion in which to file
comments with the Court.
3
3. All comments must be filed with the Court on or before
August 6, 2024, as well as a separate request for oral argument if
the person filing the comment wishes to participate in oral
argument, which may be scheduled in this case. If filed by an
attorney in good standing with The Florida Bar, the comment must
be electronically filed via the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal (Portal).
If filed by a nonlawyer or a lawyer not licensed to practice in
Florida, the comment may be, but is not required to be, filed via the
Portal. Any person unable to submit a comment electronically must
mail or hand-deliver the originally signed comment to the Florida
- 9 -
The Court is grateful for the Committee’s and the Workgroup’s
hard work, dedication, and recommendations. We also extend our
appreciation to the commenters for their insight and assistance.
It is so ordered.
MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, FRANCIS, and
SASSO, JJ., concur.
LABARGA, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion.
THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER
THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.
LABARGA, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur with the majority’s decision to amend the Florida
Rules of Civil Procedure as set forth in the appendix to this opinion.
However, in the absence of input from The Florida Bar’s Civil
Procedure Rules Committee, I dissent to incorporating the
proportionality language of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1)
into rule 1.280(c), “Scope of Discovery.”
I would refer the issue of proportionality to the rules
committee for its consideration and commentary before amending
rule 1.280 to include the rule 26(b)(1) proportionality language.
Supreme Court, Office of the Clerk, 500 South Duval Street,
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1927.
- 10 -
Original Proceeding Florida Rules of Civil Procedure
Judson Lee Cohen, Chair, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, Miami
Lakes, Florida, Landis V. Curry III, Past Chair, Civil Procedure
Rules Committee, Tampa, Florida, Joshua E. Doyle, Executive
Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida, and Heather Savage
Telfer, Bar Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida,
for Petitioner
Joshua L. Wintle of Panter, Panter & Sampedro, P.A., Miami,
Florida; Jed Kurzban of Kurzban Kurzban Tetzeli & Pratt P.A., Coral
Gables, Florida; Lee Gill Cohen, David M. Lipman, Mina Grace,
Richard Rosenblum, Matthew D. Levy, Alexis E. Altman, Jorge
Fernandez, Maria Victoria Sanchez, Eyal Steven Eisig, Ryan
Anthony Masci, and Leon O’Neal Hunter of Kanner & Pintaluga,
P.A., Boca Raton, Florida; Marc Andrew Krispinsky of Kanner &
Pintaluga, Fort Myers, Florida, Tamara Lea Klopenstein of David L.
Rich, P.A., Margate, Florida; William W. Large on behalf of the
Florida Justice Reform Institute, Tallahassee, Florida; John K.
Lawlor, Anthony Brett White, M. Benjamin Murphey, Lyle Michael
Koenig, Brittney Eller, and Monica Heuman of Lawlor White &
Murphey, Fort Lauderdale, Florida; Howard Lawrence Pomerantz of
Abramowitz, Pomerantz & Morehead, P.A., Plantation, Florida; Hon.
Albert Lewis Kelley, Key West, Florida; Russell Landy of Damian
Valori Culmo, on behalf of The Business Law Section of The Florida
Bar, Miami, Florida; Spencer H. Silverglate of Clarke Silverglate,
P.A. on behalf of International Association of Defense Counsel, DRI
Center for Law and Public Policy, Federation of Defense & Corporate
Counsel, Association of Defense Trial Attorneys, Florida Chamber of
Commerce, Associated Industries of Florida, Florida Insurance
Council, American Tort Reform Association, National Federation of
Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, Inc., American
Property Casualty Insurance Association, National Association of
Mutual Insurance Companies, Coalition for Litigation Justice, Inc.,
Washington Legal Foundation, Pharmaceutical Research and
Manufacturers of America, and Alliance for Automotive Innovation,
Miami, Florida; Karen A. Gievers, Tallahassee, Florida; Hon. Angela
Cote Dempsey on behalf of the Second Judicial Circuit Judges,
- 11 -
Tallahassee, Florida; Sara Katherine Marin of Rubenstein Law, P.A.,
Miami, Florida; Timothy David Kenison of Law Offices of Craig
Goldenfarb, West Palm Beach, Florida; Karly R. Christine of
Christine Law, P.A., Sarasota, Florida; Jennifer Gentry Fernandez
and Frank F. Fernandez, III on behalf of The Fernandez Firm,
Tampa, Florida; Christopher W. Mathena of Fulgencio Law, PLLC
Tampa, Florida; Virginia Marie Buchanan of Levin, Papantonio,
Rafferty, Proctor, Buchanan, O’Brien, Barr, & Mougey, P.A.,
Pensacola, Florida; Sherri Lynn Scarborough and Spencer L.
Pastorin of Howell & Thornhill, P.A., Winter Haven, Florida; Hon.
Lisa T. Munyon on behalf of the Civil Judges of the Ninth Judicial
Circuit, Orlando, Florida; Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Judge Paul L.
Huey, Tampa, Florida; Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Judge Anne-Leigh
Gaylord Moe, Hon. Lisa Ann Allen, Hon. Helene Daniel, Hon. Alissa
McKee Ellison, and David Anthony Rowland, Tampa, Florida; S.
Katherine Frazier of Hill Ward Henderson on behalf of the Real
Property, Probate, and Trust Law Section of The Florida Bar,
Tampa, Florida; Jack Patrick Hill of Searcy Denney Scarola
Barnhart & Shipley, PA, West Palm Beach, Florida; Kansas R.
Gooden of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., and Sarah Lahlou-Amine of
Banker Lopez Gassler P.A. on behalf of Florida Defense Lawyers
Association, Miami, Florida, Andrew P. Keefe, Assistant County
Attorney, Pinellas County Attorney’s Office, Clearwater, Florida,
John Edwards, Fort Myers, Florida; Matthew Joseph Cardillo of
Matt Cardillo, P.A, Tampa, Florida; Charles S. Stratton, Joshua
Scott Stratton, and Sidney Conwell Bigham III of Berger Singerman
LLP, Tallahassee, Florida, S. Cary Gaylord, Blake H. Gaylord,
Kimbel L. Merlin, Lorena Hart Ludovici, and Andrew Gerald Diaz of
Gaylord Merlin Ludovici & Diaz, Tampa, Florida, Andrew Prince
Brigham, Trevor S. Hutson, and Christopher C. Bucalo of Brigham
Property Rights Law Firm, PLLC, St. Augustine, Florida; Hon.
Waddell Arlie Wallace III, on behalf of the Circuit Judges of the Civil
Division of the Fourth Judicial Circuit, Jacksonville, Florida; Hon.
Patricia Ann Muscarella on behalf of the Civil Judges of the Sixth
Judicial Circuit, Clearwater, Florida; Peter M. Cardillo of Cardillo
Law Firm, Tampa, Florida; Maegen Peek Luka of Newsome Melton,
Orlando, Florida; Joseph Anthony Zarzaur, Jr., Stephen F. Bolton,
and Alexandra Jane Messmore of Zarzaur Law, P.A., Pensacola,
Florida; Anna Frederiksen-Cherry of Swope, Rodante P.A., Tampa,
- 12 -
Florida; and John W. Little, III on behalf of the Business Litigation
Practice Group of Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart P.A., West Palm
Beach, Florida,
Responding with Comments
- 13 -
APPENDIX
RULE 1.200. CASE MANAGEMENT; PRETRIAL PROCEDURE
(a) Case Management Conference. At any time after
responsive pleadings or motions are due, the court may order, or a
party by serving a notice may convene, a case management
conference. The matter to be considered must be specified in the
order or notice setting the conference. At such a conference the
court may:
(1) schedule or reschedule the service of motions,
pleadings, and other documents;
(2) set or reset the time of trials, subject to rule
1.440(c);
(3) coordinate the progress of the action if the complex
litigation factors contained in rule 1.201(a)(2)(A)(a)(2)(H) are
present;
(4) limit, schedule, order, or expedite discovery;
(5) consider the possibility of obtaining admissions of
fact and voluntary exchange of documents and electronically stored
information, and stipulations regarding authenticity of documents
and electronically stored information;
(6) consider the need for advance rulings from the
court on the admissibility of documents and electronically stored
information;
(7) discuss as to electronically stored information, the
possibility of agreements from the parties regarding the extent to
which such evidence should be preserved, the form in which such
evidence should be produced, and whether discovery of such
information should be conducted in phases or limited to particular
individuals, time periods, or sources;
- 14 -
(8) schedule disclosure of expert witnesses and the
discovery of facts known and opinions held by such experts;
(9) schedule or hear motions in limine;
(10) pursue the possibilities of settlement;
(11) require filing of preliminary stipulations if issues
can be narrowed;
(12) consider referring issues to a magistrate for findings
of fact; and
(13) schedule other conferences or determine other
matters that may aid in the disposition of the action.
(b) Pretrial Conference. After the action is at issue the
court itself may or shall on the timely motion of any party require
the parties to appear for a conference to consider and determine:
(1) the simplification of the issues;
(2) the necessity or desirability of amendments to the
pleadings;
(3) the possibility of obtaining admissions of fact and of
documents that will avoid unnecessary proof;
(4) the limitation of the number of expert witnesses;
(5) the potential use of juror notebooks; and
(6) any matters permitted under subdivision (a) of this rule.
(c) Notice. Reasonable notice must be given for a case
management conference, and 20 days’ notice must be given for a
pretrial conference. On failure of a party to attend a conference, the
court may dismiss the action, strike the pleadings, limit proof or
witnesses, or take any other appropriate action. Any documents
that the court requires for any conference must be specified in the
- 15 -
order. Orders setting pretrial conferences must be uniform
throughout the territorial jurisdiction of the court.
(d) Pretrial Order. The court must make an order reciting
the action taken at a conference and any stipulations made. The
order controls the subsequent course of the action unless modified
to prevent injustice.
(a) Applicability; Exemptions. The requirements of this
rule apply to all civil actions except:
(1) actions required to proceed under section 51.011,
Florida Statutes;
(2) actions proceeding under section 45.075, Florida
Statutes;
(3) actions subject to the Florida Small Claims Rules,
unless the court, under rule 7.020(c), has ordered the action to
proceed under one or more of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure
and the deadline for the trial date specified in rule 7.090(d) no
longer applies;
(4) an action or proceeding initiated under chapters
731736, 738, and 744, Florida Statutes;
(5) an action for review of an administrative proceeding;
(6) eminent domain actions under article X, section 6 of
the Florida Constitution or chapters 73 and 74, Florida Statutes;
(7) a forfeiture action in rem arising from a state
statute;
(8) a petition for habeas corpus or any other proceeding
to challenge a criminal conviction or sentence;
(9) an action brought without an attorney by a person
in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision;
- 16 -
(10) an action to enforce or quash an administrative
summons or subpoena;
(11) a proceeding ancillary to a proceeding in another
court;
(12) an action to enforce an arbitration award;
(13) an action involving an extraordinary writ or remedy
under rule 1.630;
(14) actions to confirm or enforce foreign judgments;
(15) all proceedings under chapter 56, Florida Statutes;
(16) a civil action pending in a special division of the
court established by administrative order issued by the chief judge
of the circuit or local rule (e.g., a complex business division or a
complex civil division) that enters case management orders;
(17) all proceedings under chapter 415, Florida Statutes,
and sections 393.12 and 825.1035, Florida Statutes; and
(18) a claim requiring expedited or priority resolution
under an applicable statute or rule.
(b) Case Track Assignment. Not later than 120 days after
an action commences as provided in rule 1.050, the court must
assign each civil case to 1 of 3 case management tracks either by
an initial case management order or an administrative order on
case management issued by the chief judge of the circuit:
streamlined, general, or complex. Assignment is not based on the
financial value of the case but rather the amount of judicial
attention required for resolution.
(1) Complex” cases are actions designated by court
order as complex under rule 1.201(a). Complex cases must proceed
as provided in rule 1.201.
(2) Streamlined” cases are actions that reflect some
mutual knowledge about the underlying facts, have limited needs
- 17 -
for discovery, well-established legal issues related to liability and
damages, few anticipated dispositive pretrial motions, minimal
documentary evidence, and an anticipated trial length of no more
than 3 days. Uncontested cases should generally be presumed to
be streamlined cases.
(3) General” cases are all other actions that do not
meet the criteria for streamlined or complex.
(c) Changes in Track Assignment.
(1) Change Requested by a Party. Any motion to change
the track to which a case is assigned must be filed promptly after
the appearance of good cause to support the motion.
(2) Change Directed by the Court. A track assignment
may be changed by the court on its own motion.
(d) Case Management Order.
(1) Complex Cases. Case management orders in
complex cases must issue as provided in rule 1.201.
(2) Streamlined and General Cases. In streamlined and
general cases, the court must issue a case management order that
specifies the projected or actual trial period based on the case track
assignment, consistent with administrative orders entered by the
chief judge of the circuit. The order must also set deadlines that are
differentiated based on whether the case is streamlined or general
and must be consistent with the time standards specified in Florida
Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.250(a)(1)(B)
for the completion of civil cases. The order must specify no less
than the following deadlines:
(A) service of complaints;
(B) service under extensions;
(C) adding new parties;
(D) completion of fact discovery;
- 18 -
(E) completion of expert discovery;
(F) resolution of all objections to pleadings;
(G) resolution of all pretrial motions; and
(H) completion of alternative dispute resolution.
(3) Strict Enforcement of Deadlines. The case
management order must indicate that the deadlines established in
the order will be strictly enforced by the court.
(4) Timing of Issuance. The court must issue the case
management order no later than 120 days after commencement of
the action as provided in rule 1.050 or 30 days after service of the
complaint on the last of all named defendants, whichever date
comes first. No case management conference is required to be set
by the court before issuance.
(e) Extensions of Time; Modification of Deadlines.
(1) Deadlines are Strictly Enforced. Deadlines in a case
management order must be strictly enforced unless changed by
court order. Parties may submit an agreed order to extend a
deadline if the extension does not affect the ability to comply with
the remaining dates in the case management order. If extending an
individual case management deadline may affect a subsequent
deadline in the case management order, parties must seek an
amendment of the case management order, rather than submitting
a motion for extension of an individual deadline.
(2) Modification of Actual Trial Period. Once an actual
trial period is set, the parties must satisfy the requirements of rule
1.460 to change that period. During the time a trial period is still a
projection, the parties may seek to change the projected trial period
through the process in subdivision (e)(3).
(3) Modifications of Deadlines or Projected Trial Period.
Any motion to extend a deadline, amend a case management order,
or alter a projected trial period must specify:
- 19 -
(A) the basis of the need for the extension,
including when the basis became known to the movant;
(B) whether the motion is opposed;
(C) the specific date to which the movant is
requesting the deadline or projected trial period be extended, and
whether that date is agreed by all parties; and
(D) the action and specific dates for the action that
will enable the movant to meet the proposed new deadline or
projected trial period, including, but not limited to, confirming the
specific date any required participants such as third-party
witnesses or experts are available.
(f) Notices of Unavailability. Notices of unavailability have
no effect on the deadlines set by the case management order. If a
party is unable to comply with a deadline in a case management
order, the party must take action consistent with subdivision (e)(1).
(g) Inability to Meet Case Management Deadlines. If any
party is unable to meet the deadlines set forth in the case
management order for any reason, including due to the
unavailability of hearing time, the affected party may promptly set a
case management conference and alert the court. The notice of case
management conference must identify the issues to be addressed in
the case management conference.
(h) If Trial Is Not Reached During Trial Period. If a trial is
not reached during the trial period set by court order, the court
must enter an order setting a new trial period that is as soon as
practicable, given the needs of the case and resources of the court.
The order resetting the trial period must reflect what further activity
will or will not be permitted.
(i) Forms. Except for case management orders issued in
cases governed by rule 1.201, the forms for case management
orders will be set by the chief judge of the circuit. The form orders
must comply with the requirements of this rule.
- 20 -
(j) Case Management Conferences.
(1) Scheduling. The court may set case management
conferences at any time on its own notice or on proper notice by a
party. Whether set by the court or a party, the amount of notice
must be reasonable. If noticed by a party, the notice itself must
identify the specific issues to be addressed during the case
management conference and must also provide a list of all pending
motions. The court may set, or the parties may request, case
management conferences on an as-needed basis or an ongoing,
periodic basis.
(2) Issues That May Be Addressed. During a case
management conference, the court may address all scheduling
issues, including requests to amend the case management order,
and other issues that may impact trial of the case. In addition, on
reasonable notice to the parties and adequate time available during
the conference, the court may elect to hear a pending motion, other
than motions for summary judgment and motions requiring
evidentiary hearings, even if the parties have not identified the
motion as an issue to be resolved. Motions for summary judgment
and motions requiring evidentiary hearings may not be heard as
part of a case management conference.
(3) Preparation Required. Attorneys and self-
represented litigants who appear at a case management conference
must be prepared on the pending matters in the case, be prepared
to make decisions about future progress and conduct of the case,
and have authority to make representations to the court and enter
into binding agreements concerning motions, issues, and
scheduling. If a party is represented by more than 1 attorney, the
attorney(s) present at a case management conference must be
prepared with all attorneys’ availability for future events.
(4) Other Hearings Convertible. Any scheduled hearing
may be converted to a sua sponte case management conference by
agreement of the parties at the time of the hearing.
(5) Proposed Orders. At the conclusion of the case
management conference, unless the court is drafting its own order,
- 21 -
the court must set a deadline for submitting proposed orders
arising out of the case management conference. A proposed order
must be submitted by that deadline unless an extension is
requested. If the parties do not agree to the contents of a proposed
order, competing proposed orders must be submitted to the court.
The parties must notify the court of the basis of any objections at
the time the competing orders are submitted.
(6) Failure to Appear. On failure of a party to attend a
conference, the court may dismiss the action, strike the pleadings,
limit proof or witnesses, or take any other appropriate action
against a party failing to attend.
(k) Pretrial Conference. After the action has been set for an
actual trial period, the court itself may, or must on the timely
motion of any party, require the parties to appear for a conference
to consider and determine:
(1) a statement of the issues to be tried;
(2) the possibility of obtaining evidentiary and other
stipulations that will avoid unnecessary proof;
(3) the witnesses who are expected to testify, evidence
expected to be proffered, and any associated logistical or scheduling
issues;
(4) the use of technology and other means to facilitate
the presentation of evidence and demonstrative aids at trial;
(5) the order of proof at trial, time to complete the trial,
and reasonable time estimates for voir dire, opening statements,
closing arguments, and any other part of the trial;
(6) the numbers of prospective jurors required for a
venire, alternate jurors, and peremptory challenges for each party;
(7) finalize jury instructions and verdict forms; and
(8) any other matters the court considers appropriate.
- 22 -
Committee Notes
[No Change]
Court Commentary
1984 Amendment. [No Change]
2024 Amendment. Rule 1.200 as amended is intended to
supersede any case management rules issued by circuit courts and
administrative orders on case management to the extent of
contradiction. The rule is not intended to preclude the possibility of
administrative orders issued by circuit chief judges and local rules
under Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration
2.215 that refine and supplement the procedures delineated in the
rule, including rollover practices for situations where a trial is not
reached during the scheduled trial period.
RULE 1.201. COMPLEX LITIGATION
(a) Complex Litigation Defined. At any time after all
defendants have been served, and an appearance has been entered
in response to the complaint by each party or a default entered, any
party, or the court on its own motion, may move to declare an
action complex. However, any party may move to designate an
action complex before all defendants have been served subject to a
showing to the court why service has not been made on all
defendants. The court shallmay convene a hearing to determine
whether the action requires the use of complex litigation procedures
and enter an order within 10 days of the conclusion of the hearing.
(1)(2) [No Change]
(3) If all of the parties, pro se or through counsel, sign
and file with the clerk of the court a written stipulation to the fact
that an action is complex and identifying the factors in (2)(A)
through (2)(H) above that apply, the court shall enter an order
designating the action as complex without a hearing.A case will be
- 23 -
designated or redesignated as complex in accordance with rule
1.200.
(b) Initial Case Management Report and Conference. The
court shallmust hold an initial case management conference within
60 days from the date of the order declaring the action complex.
(1) At least 20 days prior to the date of the initial case
management conference, attorneys for the parties as well as any
parties appearing pro se shallmust confer and prepare a joint
statement, which shallmust be filed with the clerk of the court no
later than 14 days before the conference, outlining a discovery plan
and stating:
(A)-(D) [No Change]
(E) the proposed limits on the time:
(i) to join other parties and to amend the
pleadings,;
(ii) to file and hear motions,;
(iii) to identify any nonparties whose identity
is known, or otherwise describe as specifically as practicable any
nonparties whose identity is not known,;
(iv) to disclose expert witnesses,; and
(v) to complete discovery;
(F)-(P) [No Change]
(2) Lead trial counsel and a client representative
shallmust attend the initial case management conference.
(3) Notwithstanding rule 1.440, aAt the initial case
management conference, the court will set the trial date or dates no
sooner than 6 months and no later than 24 months from the date of
the conference unless good cause is shown for an earlier or later
setting. The trial date or dates shallmust be on a docket having
- 24 -
sufficient time within which to try the action and, when feasible, for
a date or dates certain. The trial date shallmust be set after
consultation with counsel and in the presence of all clients or
authorized client representatives. The court shallmust, no later
than 2 months prior tobefore the date scheduled for jury selection,
arrange for a sufficient number of available jurors. Continuance of
the trial of a complex action should rarely be granted and then only
upon good cause shown. Any motion for continuance will be
governed by rule 1.460.
(c) The Case Management Order. Within 10 days after
completion of the initial case management conference, the court
must enter a case management order. The case management order
shallmust address each matter set forth under rule 1.200(ad)(2) and
set the action for a pretrial conference and trial. The case
management order also shallmust specify the following:
(1) Dates by which all parties shallmust name their
expert witnesses and provide the expert information required by
rule 1.280(bc)(5). If a party has named an expert witness in a field
in which any other parties have not identified experts, the other
parties may name experts in that field within 30 days thereafter. No
additional experts may be named unless good cause is shown.
(2) Not more than 10 days after the date set for naming
experts, the parties shallmust meet and schedule dates for
deposition of experts and all other witnesses not yet deposed. At the
time of the meeting each party is responsible for having secured
three confirmed dates for its expert witnesses. In the event the
parties cannot agree on a discovery deposition schedule, the court,
upon motion, shallmust set the schedule. Any party may file the
completed discovery deposition schedule agreed upon or entered by
the court. Once filed, the deposition dates in the schedule shallmay
not be altered without consent of all parties or upon order of the
court. Failure to comply with the discovery schedule may result in
sanctions in accordance with rule 1.380.
(3) [No Change]
- 25 -
(4) The court shallmust schedule periodic case
management conferences and hearings on lengthy motions at
reasonable intervals based on the particular needs of the action.
The attorneys for the parties as well as any parties appearing pro se
shallmust confer no later than 15 days prior to each case
management conference or hearing. They shall notify the court at
least 10 days prior to any case management conference or hearing if
the parties stipulate that a case management conference or hearing
time is unnecessary. The parties must notify the court immediately
if a case management conference or hearing time becomes
unnecessary. Failure to timely notify the court that a case
management conference or hearing time is unnecessary may result
in sanctions.
(5)-(6) [No Change]
(d) Final Case Management Conference. The court
shallmust schedule a final case management conference not less
than 90 days prior tobefore the date the case is set for trial. At least
10 days prior tobefore the final case management conference the
parties shallmust confer to prepare a case status report, which
shallmust be filed with the clerk of the court either prior tobefore or
at the time of the final case management conference. The status
report shallmust contain in separately numbered paragraphs:
(1)-(5) [No Change]
(6) Certification that copies of witness and exhibit lists
will be filed with the clerk of the court at least 48 hours prior
tobefore the date and time of the final case management conference.
(7) A deadline for the filing of amended lists of
witnesses and exhibits, which amendments shallwill be allowed
only upon motion and for good cause shown.
(8) [No Change]
Committee Notes
[No Change]
- 26 -
RULE 1.280. GENERAL PROVISIONS GOVERNING DISCOVERY
(a) Initial Discovery Disclosure.
(1) In General. Except as exempted by subdivision (a)(2)
or as ordered by the court, a party must, without awaiting a
discovery request, provide to the other parties the following initial
discovery disclosures unless privileged or protected from disclosure:
(A) the name and, if known, the address,
telephone number, and e-mail address of each individual likely to
have discoverable informationalong with the subjects of that
informationthat the disclosing party may use to support its
claims or defenses, unless the use would be solely for
impeachment;
(B) a copyor a description by category and
locationof all documents, electronically stored information, and
tangible things that the disclosing party has in its possession,
custody, or control (or, if not in the disclosing party’s possession,
custody, or control, a description by category and location of such
information) and may use to support its claims or defenses, unless
the use would be solely for impeachment;
(C) a computation for each category of damages
claimed by the disclosing party and a copy of the documents or
other evidentiary material, unless privileged or protected from
disclosure, on which each computation is based, including
materials bearing on the nature and extent of injuries suffered;
provided that a party is not required to provide computations as to
noneconomic damages, but the party must identify categories of
damages claimed and provide supporting documents; and
(D) a copy of any insurance policy or agreement
under which an insurance business may be liable to satisfy all or
part of a possible judgment in the action or to indemnify or
reimburse for payments made to satisfy the judgment.
- 27 -
(2) Proceedings Exempt from Initial Discovery Disclosure.
Unless ordered by the court, actions and claims listed in rule
1.200(a) are exempt from initial discovery disclosure.
(3) Time for Initial Discovery Disclosures. A party must
make the initial discovery disclosures required by this rule within
60 days after the service of the complaint or joinder, unless a
different time is set by court order.
(4) Basis for Initial Discovery Disclosure; Unacceptable
Excuses; Objections. A party must make its initial discovery
disclosures based on the information then reasonably available to
it. A party is not excused from making its initial discovery
disclosures because it has not fully investigated the case or because
it challenges the sufficiency of another party’s initial discovery
disclosures or because another party has not made its initial
discovery disclosures. A party who formally objects to providing
certain information is not excused from making all other initial
discovery disclosures required by this rule in a timely manner.
(ab) Discovery Methods. Parties may obtain discovery by
one1 or more of the following methods: depositions upon oral
examination or written questions; written interrogatories;
production of documents or things or permission to enter upon land
or other property for inspection and other purposes; physical and
mental examinations; and requests for admission. Unless the court
orders otherwise and under subdivision (c)(d) of this rule, the
frequency of use of these methods is not limited, except as provided
in rules 1.200, 1.340, and 1.370.
(bc) Scope of Discovery. Unless otherwise limited by court
order of the court in accordance with these rules, the scope of
discovery is as follows:
(1) In General. Parties may obtain discovery regarding
any nonprivileged matter, not privileged, that is relevant to any
party’s claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case,
considering the importance of the issues at stake in the action, the
amount in controversy, the parties’ relative access to relevant
information, the parties’ resources, the importance of the discovery
- 28 -
in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the
proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit. Information within
this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be
discoverable.the subject matter of the pending action, whether it
relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or the
claim or defense of any other party, including the existence,
description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any books,
documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of
persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. It is not
ground for objection that the information sought will be
inadmissible at the trial if the information sought appears
reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible
evidence.
(2) [No Change]
(3) Electronically Stored Information. A party may obtain
discovery of electronically stored information in accordance
withunder these rules.
(4) Trial Preparation:; Materials. Subject to the
provisions of subdivision (b)(c)(5) of this rule, a party may obtain
discovery of documents and tangible things otherwise discoverable
under subdivision (b)(c)(1) of this rule and prepared in anticipation
of litigation or for trial by or for another party or by or for that
party’s representative, including that party’s attorney, consultant,
surety, indemnitor, insurer, or agent, only upon a showing that the
party seeking discovery has need of the materials in the preparation
of the case and is unable without undue hardship to obtain the
substantial equivalent of the materials by other means. In ordering
discovery of the materials when the required showing has been
made, the court shallmust protect against disclosure of the mental
impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an attorney
or other representative of a party concerning the litigation. Without
the required showing a party may obtain a copy of a statement
concerning the action or its subject matter previously made by that
party. UpoOn request without the required showing a person not a
party may obtain a copy of a statement concerning the action or its
subject matter previously made by that person. If the request is
- 29 -
refused, the person may move for an order to obtain a copy. The
provisions of rule 1.380(a)(4) apply to the award of expenses
incurred as a result of making the motion. For purposes of this
paragraph, a statement previously made is a written statement
signed or otherwise adopted or approved by the person making it, or
a stenographic, mechanical, electrical, or other recording or
transcription of it that is a substantially verbatim recital of an oral
statement by the person making it and contemporaneously
recorded.
(5) Trial Preparation:; Experts. Discovery of facts known
and opinions held by experts, otherwise discoverable under the
provisions of subdivision (b)(c)(1) of this rule and acquired or
developed in anticipation of litigation or for trial, may be obtained
only as follows:
(A) (i)-(ii) [No Change]
(iii) A party may obtain the following
discovery regarding any person disclosed by interrogatories or
otherwise as a person expected to be called as an expert witness at
trial:
1.-3. [No Change]
4. An approximation of the portion of
the expert’s involvement as an expert witness, which may be based
on the number of hours, percentage of hours, or percentage of
earned income derived from serving as an expert witness; however,
the expert shallwill not be required to disclose his or herthe expert’s
earnings as an expert witness or income derived from other
services.
An expert may be required to produce financial and business
records only under the most unusual or compelling circumstances
and may not be compelled to compile or produce nonexistent
documents. UpoOn motion, the court may order further discovery
by other means, subject to such restrictions as to scope and other
provisions pursuant tounder subdivision (b)(c)(5)(C) of this rule
concerning fees and expenses as the court may deem appropriate.
- 30 -
(B) [No Change]
(C) Unless manifest injustice would result, the
court shallwill require that the party seeking discovery pay the
expert a reasonable fee for time spent in responding to discovery
under subdivisions (b)(c)(5)(A) and (b)(c)(5)(B) of this rule; and
concerning discovery from an expert obtained under subdivision
(b)(c)(5)(A) of this rule the court may require, and concerning
discovery obtained under subdivision (b)(c)(5)(B) of this rule
shallwill require, the party seeking discovery to pay the other party
a fair part of the fees and expenses reasonably incurred by the
latter party in obtaining facts and opinions from the expert.
(D) As used in these rules an expert witness shall
be an expert witness as is defined in rule 1.390(a).
(6) Claims of Privilege or Protection of Trial Preparation
Materials. When a party withholds information otherwise
discoverable under these rules by claiming that it is privileged or
subject to protection as trial preparation material, the party
shallmust make the claim expressly and shallmust describe the
nature of the documents, communications, or things not produced
or disclosed in a manner that, without revealing information itself
privileged or protected, will enable other parties to assess the
applicability of the privilege or protection.
(cd) Protective Orders. UpoOn motion by a party or by the
person from whom discovery is sought, and for good cause shown,
the court in which the action is pending may make any order to
protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment,
oppression, or undue burden or expense that justice requires,
including one1 or more of the following:
(1) that the discovery not be had;
(2) that the discovery may be had only on specified
terms and conditions, including a designation of the time or place
or the allocation of expenses;
- 31 -
(3) that the discovery may be had only by a method of
discovery other than that selected by the party seeking discovery;
(4) that certain matters not be inquired into, or that the
scope of the discovery be limited to certain matters;
(5) that discovery be conducted with no one present
except persons designated by the court;
(6) that a deposition after being sealed be opened only
by order of the court;
(7) that a trade secret or other confidential research,
development, or commercial information not be disclosed or be
disclosed only in a designated way; and
(8) that the parties simultaneously file specified
documents or information enclosed in sealed envelopes to be
opened as directed by the court.
If the motion for a protective order is denied in whole or in part, the
court may, on such terms and conditions as are just, order that any
party or person provide or permit discovery. The provisions of rule
1.380(a)(4) apply to the award of expenses incurred in relation to
the motion.
(de) Limitations on Discovery of Electronically Stored
Information.
(1) [No Change]
(2) In determining any motion involving discovery of
electronically stored information, the court must limit the frequency
or extent of discovery otherwise allowed by these rules if it
determines that:
(iA) the discovery sought is unreasonably
cumulative or duplicative, or can be obtained from another source
or in another manner that is more convenient, less burdensome, or
less expensive; or
- 32 -
(iiB) the burden or expense of the discovery
outweighs its likely benefit, considering the needs of the case, the
amount in controversy, the parties’ resources, the importance of the
issues at stake in the action, and the importance of the discovery in
resolving the issues.
(ef) Sequence and Timing of Discovery. Except as provided
in subdivision (b)(c)(5) or unless the court upon motion for the
convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice
orders otherwise, methods of discovery may be used in any
sequence, and the fact that a party is conducting discovery,
whether by deposition or otherwise, shallmust not delay any other
party’s discovery.
(fg) Supplementing of Responses. A party who has
responded to a request for discovery with a response that was
complete when made is under no duty to supplement the response
to include information thereafter acquired.A party who has made a
disclosure under this rule or who has responded to an
interrogatory, a request for production, or a request for admission
must supplement or correct its disclosure or response:
(1) in a timely manner if the party learns that in some
material respect the disclosure or response is incomplete or
incorrect, and if the additional or corrective information has not
otherwise been made known to the other parties during the
discovery process or in writing; or
(2) as ordered by the court.
(gh) Court Filing of Documents and Discovery. Information
obtained during discovery shallmay not be filed with the court until
such time as it is filed for good cause. The requirement of good
cause is satisfied only wherewhen the filing of the information is
allowed or required by another applicable rule of procedure or by
court order. All filings of discovery documents shallmust comply
with Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration
2.425. The court shall haves the authority to impose sanctions for
violation of this rule.
- 33 -
(hi) Apex Doctrine. A current or former high-level
government or corporate officer may seek an order preventing the
officer from being subject to a deposition. The motion, whether by a
party or by the person of whom the deposition is sought, must be
accompanied by an affidavit or declaration of the officer explaining
that the officer lacks unique, personal knowledge of the issues
being litigated. If the officer meets this burden of production, the
court shall issue an order preventing the deposition, unless the
party seeking the deposition demonstrates that it has exhausted
other discovery, that such discovery is inadequate, and that the
officer has unique, personal knowledge of discoverable information.
The court may vacate or modify the order if, after additional
discovery, the party seeking the deposition can meet its burden of
persuasion under this rule. The burden to persuade the court that
the officer is high-level for purposes of this rule lies with the person
or party opposing the deposition.
(ij) Form of Responses to Written Discovery Requests.
When responding to requests for production served pursuant
tounder rule 1.310(b)(5), written deposition questions served
pursuant tounder rule 1.320, interrogatories served pursuant
tounder rule 1.340, requests for production or inspection served
pursuant tounder rule 1.350, requests for production of documents
or things without deposition served pursuant tounder rule 1.351,
requests for admissions served pursuant tounder rule 1.370, or
requests for the production of documentary evidence served
pursuant tounder rule 1.410(c), the responding party shallmust
state each deposition question, interrogatory, or discovery request
in full as numbered, followed by the answer, objection, or other
response.
(k) Signing Disclosures and Discovery Requests;
Responses; and Objections. Every discovery under subdivision (a)
of this rule and every discovery request, response, or objection
made by a party represented by an attorney must be signed by at
least 1 attorney of record and must include the attorney’s address,
e-mail address, and telephone number. A self-represented litigant
must sign the request, response, or objection and must include the
self-represented litigant’s address, e-mail address, and telephone
- 34 -
number. By signing, an attorney or self-represented litigant certifies
that to the best of the person’s knowledge, information, and belief
formed after a reasonable inquiry:
(1) with respect to a disclosure, it is complete and
correct as of the time it is made; and
(2) with respect to a discovery request, response, or
objection, it is:
(A) consistent with these rules and warranted by
existing law or a good faith argument for the extension,
modification, or reversal of existing law;
(B) not interposed for any improper purpose, such
as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in
the cost of litigation; and
(C) not unreasonable or unduly burdensome or
expensive, given the needs of the case, the discovery already had in
the case, the amount in controversy, and the importance of the
issues at stake in the litigation.
No party has a duty to act on an unsigned disclosure, request,
response, or objection until it is signed.
Committee Notes
[No Change]
Court Commentary
[No Change]
RULE 1.440. SETTING ACTION FOR TRIAL
(a) When at IssueSetting Trial. An action is at issue after
any motions directed to the last pleading served have been disposed
of or, if no such motions are served, 20 days after service of the last
pleading. The party entitled to serve motions directed to the last
- 35 -
pleading may waive the right to do so by filing a notice for trial at
any time after the last pleading is served. The existence of
crossclaims among the parties shall not prevent the court from
setting the action for trial on the issues raised by the complaint,
answer, and any answer to a counterclaimThe failure of the
pleadings to be closed will not preclude the court from setting a
case for trial.
(b) NoticeMotion for Trial. ThereafterFor any case not
subject to rule 1.200 or rule 1.201 or for any case in which any
party seeks a trial for a date earlier than the projected or actual
trial period specified in a case management order, any party may
file and serve a noticemotion that the action is at issue and ready to
be set the action for trial. The noticemotion must include an
estimate of the time required, whether there is a basis for expedited
trial, indicate whether the trialit is to be by a jury or notnon-jury
trial, and whether the trial is on the original action or a subsequent
proceeding, and, if applicable, indicate that the court has
authorized the participation of prospective jurors or empaneled
jurors through audio-video communication technology under rule
1.430(d). The clerk must then submit the notice and the case file to
the court.The moving party must serve a copy of the motion on the
presiding judge at the time the motion is filed.
(c) Fixing Trial Period.
(1) On a party’s motion or upon the court’s own
initiative, if the court finds the action ready to be set for a trial
period earlier than the projected or actual trial period specified in
the case management order entered under rule 1.200 or rule 1.201,
the court may enter an order fixing an earlier trial period.
(2) For any case subject to rule 1.200 with a projected
trial period in the case management order, not later than 45 days
before the projected trial period set forth in the case management
order, the court must enter an order fixing the trial period.
(3) For any case not subject to rule 1.200 or 1.201, on
a party’s motion or upon the court’s own initiative, if the court finds
- 36 -
the action ready to be set for trial, the court must enter an order
fixing the trial period.
(4) Any order setting a trial period must set the trial
period to begin at least 30 days after the date of the court’s service
of the order, unless all parties agree otherwise.
(d) Setting for TrialService on Defaulted Parties. If the
court finds the action ready to be set for trial, it shall enter an order
fixing a date for trial. Trial shall be set not less than 30 days from
the service of the notice for trial. By giving the same notice the court
may set an action for trial. In actions in which the damages are not
liquidated, the order setting an action for trial shallmust be served
on parties who are in default in accordance with Florida Rule of
General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516.
(de) Applicability. This rule does not apply to actions to
whichunder chapter 51, Florida Statutes (1967), applies or to cases
designated as complex pursuant to rule 1.201.
Committee Notes
[No Change]
Court Commentary
1984 Amendment. [No Change]
2024 Amendment. This rule has been substantially amended.
It no longer requires that a case be “at issue” before the case can be
set for trial, and it ties the date of trial directly to any projected trial
period set forth in a case management order.
RULE 1.460. CONTINUANCESMOTIONS TO CONTINUE TRIAL
A motion for continuance shall be in writing unless made at a
trial and, except for good cause shown, shall be signed by the party
requesting the continuance. The motion shall state all of the facts
that the movant contends entitle the movant to a continuance. If a
- 37 -
continuance is sought on the ground of nonavailability of a witness,
the motion must show when it is believed the witness will be
available.
(a) Generally. Motions to continue trial are disfavored and
should rarely be granted and then only upon good cause shown.
Successive continuances are highly disfavored. Lack of due
diligence in preparing for trial is not grounds to continue the case.
Motions for continuance based on parental leave are governed by
Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.570.
(b) Motion; Requirements. A motion to continue trial must
be in writing unless made at a trial and, except for good cause
shown, must be signed by the named party requesting the
continuance.
(c) Motion; Timing of Filing. A motion to continue trial
must be filed promptly after the appearance of good cause to
support such motion. Failure to promptly request a continuance
may be a basis for denying the motion to continue.
(d) Motion; Contents. The moving party or counsel must
make reasonable efforts to confer with the non-moving party or
opposing counsel about the need for a continuance, and the non-
moving party or opposing counsel must cooperate in responding
and holding a conference. All motions for continuance, even if
agreed, must state with specificity:
(1) the basis of the need for the continuance, including
when the basis became known to the movant;
(2) whether the motion is opposed;
(3) the action and specific dates for the action that will
enable the movant to be ready for trial by the proposed date,
including, but not limited to, confirming the specific date any
required participants such as third-party witnesses or experts are
available; and
- 38 -
(4) the proposed date by which the case will be ready
for trial and whether that date is agreed by all parties.
If the required conference did not occur, the motion must explain
the dates and methods of the efforts to confer. Failure to confer by
any party or attorney under this rule may result in sanctions.
(e) Efforts to Avoid Continuances. To avoid continuances,
trial courts should use all appropriate methods to address the
issues causing delay, including requiring depositions to preserve
testimony, allowing remote appearances, and resolving conflicts
with other judges as provided in the Florida Rules of General
Practice and Judicial Administration.
(f) Setting Trial Date. When possible, continued trial dates
must be set in collaboration with attorneys and self-represented
litigants as opposed to the issuance of unilateral dates by the court.
(g) Dilatory Conduct. If a continuance is granted based on
the dilatory conduct of an attorney or named party, the court may
impose sanctions on the attorney, the party, or both.
(h) Order on Motion for Continuance. When ruling on a
motion to continue, the court must state, either on the record or in
a written order, the factual basis for the ruling. An order granting a
motion to continue must either set a new trial period or set a case
management conference. If the trial is continued, the new trial must
be set for the earliest date practicable, given the needs of the case
and resources of the court. The order must reflect what further
activity will or will not be permitted.
Committee Notes
[No Change]