2 | Page
UC Davis Charging Practices
UC Davis Charging Practices take into account the rules of our largest sponsor, the federal government, and the policies
and procedures set forth in the University of California Office of Research Policy Analysis and Coordination
Contract and
Grant Manual. UC Davis Charging Practices are based on Cost Accounting Standards Board Areas of Consistency (CASB)
and UCOP Contracts and Grants Manual, Chapter 7.
Cost Accounting Standards Board Areas of Consistency
The federal Cost Accounting Standards Board (CASB
) has the following four cost accounting standards applicable to UC
Davis which help to clarify what costs must be treated consistently.
• Estimating, Accumulating and Reporting Costs: In order to permit comparisons of estimates to actual costs, the
expenditure classifications used to estimate costs in contract and grant proposals must be consistent with those
used to accumulate and report costs.
• Allocating Costs Incurred for the Same Purpose: Costs incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances,
must be treated consistently as either direct or indirect costs.
• Accounting for Unallowable Costs: Unallowable costs must be identified and accounted for independently from
allowable costs.
• Cost Accounting Period: Consistent use of the same cost accounting period for purposes of estimating,
accumulating and reporting costs is required. At UC Davis, this is the Fiscal Year (FY) which occurs July 1- June 30.
UCOP Contracts and Grants Manual, Chapter 7
UCOP Contracts and Grants Manual, Chapter 7
provides details about the University of California's (UC) policies and
procedures related to budgets and expenditures. This chapter includes details about what costs are allowable, justifying
and documenting expenditures, cost transfers, fixed price agreements and service facilities. Many of these are similar to
the federal guidelines. However, it is important to read through these in order to identify areas where UC's policies
differ from (and are more restrictive than) the federal guidelines.
Specific Sponsor Rules
In general, each sponsor agency or entity has specific guidelines about how the funding they provide can be spent.
Below is general information based on the type of sponsor providing funding:
• Federal
• State of California
• Private
Federal Sponsors
Many federal sponsors, such as the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA), have guidelines under the Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP)
. The FDP is an association of federal
agencies, academic research institutions with administrative, faculty and technical representation and research policy
organizations working to streamline the administration of federally sponsored research. Through their partnership with
federal agencies, the FDP has developed costing guidelines which are consistent throughout the various participating
federal agencies. As a member of FDP, UC Davis is able to utilize these guidelines. In addition to the standard guidelines
through the FDP, each agency often has additional restrictions. These are detailed in specific funding announcements
and sponsor specific general guidelines. For example, NSF's funding announcement states: "Proposals submitted in
response to this program announcement should be prepared and submitted in accordance with the general guidelines
contained in the NSF Grant Proposal Guide."
State of California Sponsors
Assembly Bill 20 (AB20 2009-2010) allowed for model contract terms for research, training and public service projects
funded by State of California agencies and performed by the UC and California State University systems. However, not all
State agencies have negotiated a model agreement. Check each funding announcement and funding agency website to
determine whether there are any restrictions and consult with Sponsored Programs if terms and conditions differ from
AB20. Keep in mind that if the dollars are federal flow through (meaning some or all project funding is federal), then
both federal and state agency guidelines apply.