Changes from the prior year
We have not removed any audits designated as full scope or specific scope
components from the prior year as these components remain the most significant
to the Group, by size and risk, and the coverage remains consistent with the prior
year. In the current year, we included one additional specific scope component in
our scope which includes certain intangibles assets. As this is a cost centre, this has
reduced our coverage over adjusted profit before tax compared to the prior year.
We performed specified procedures for a larger number of components, primarily
relating to cash and cash equivalents across the Group.
Involvement with component teams
In establishing our overall approach to the Group audit, we determined the type
of work that needed to be undertaken at each of the components by us, as the
primary audit engagement team, or by component auditors from other EY global
network firms operating under our instruction. Of the seven full scope
components, audit procedures were performed on six of these directly by the
component audit team. For the 29 specific scope and specified procedures
components, eight represented work performed directly by component auditors.
Where the work was performed by component auditors, we determined the
appropriate level of involvement to enable us to determine that sufficient audit
evidence had been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group as a whole.
During the current audit cycle, we completed a combination of physical visits to
component teams and alternative oversight procedures, including meeting our
European full and specific scope components at our global audit event held in
London. We also attended video meetings and live reviewed our local audit teams’
working papers. Our physical visits included the Senior Statutory Auditor or
delegates visiting Australia, Spain, Germany, France, Great Britain, Belgium and
Indonesia.
Our site visits (both physical and virtual) involved: meeting with our component
teams to discuss and direct their audit approach; reviewing relevant working
papers and understanding the significant audit findings in response to the risk
areas including accrued customer marketing costs and taxation; holding meetings
with local management; and obtaining updates on local regulatory matters
including tax, pensions, restructuring and legal. The Group audit team interacted
regularly with the component teams where appropriate during various stages of
the audit, reviewed relevant working papers and were responsible for the scope
and direction of the audit process. This, together with the additional procedures
performed at Group level, gave us appropriate evidence for our opinion on the
Group financial statements.
Climate change
Stakeholders are increasingly interested in how climate change will impact the
Group. The Group has determined that the most significant future impacts from
climate change on its operations will be from the increased severity of extreme
weather events which could cause disruption to facilities and logistics routes,
increasing water stress or water scarcity, changes to weather and precipitation
patterns which could cause disruption to the supply of ingredients as well future
regulations (e.g. carbon tax related to greenhouse gas emissions). These are
explained on pages 48 to 60 in the Task Force On Climate Related Financial
disclosures and on pages 68 to 78 in the principal risks. The Group has also
explained its climate commitments on page 36. All of these disclosures form part
of the “Other information,” rather than the audited financial statements. Our
procedures on these unaudited disclosures therefore consisted solely of
considering whether they are materially inconsistent with the financial statements
or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit or otherwise appear to be
materially misstated, in line with our responsibilities on “Other information”.
In planning and performing our audit we assessed the potential impacts of
climate change on the Group’s business and any consequential material impact on
its financial statements.
The Group has explained in Note 1 (Impact of climate change) its articulation of
how climate change has been reflected in the financial statements including how
this aligns with their commitment to achieve net zero emissions by 2040. In Note 6
(Intangible assets and goodwill) and Note 7 (Property, plant and equipment) to
the financial statements, narrative explanation including further details over the
Group’s considerations has been provided.
Our audit effort in considering the impact of climate change on the financial
statements was focused on evaluating management’s assessment of the impact
of climate risk, physical and transition, their climate commitments, the effects of
material climate risks disclosed on pages 56 to 59 and the significant judgements
and estimates disclosed in Note 3 and whether these have been appropriately
reflected in asset values, useful economic lives, cash flow projections used in
assessing the recoverable amount of the Group’s CGUs, and also in the going
concern and viability assessment. As part of this evaluation, we performed our own
risk assessment, supported by our climate change internal specialists, to
determine the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements from
climate change which needed to be considered in our audit.
Strategic
Report
Governance and
Directors’ Report
Financial
Statements
Further Sustainability
Information
Other
Information
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc
2023 Integrated Report and Form 20-F
Independent auditor’s report to the members of Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc continued
This page does not form part of the Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2023 as filed with the SEC.