Writing Next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools
31
Garcia, J. N., & de Caso, A. M. (2004). Effects of a motivational intervention for improving the writing
of children with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 141–159.
Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003).The effects of computers on student writing: A
metaanalysis of studies from 1992 to 2002.
Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2, 1–51.
Golden, P. (1986).Writing process reconsidered.
Boston Writing Project Newsletter.
Graham, S. (1990).The role of production factors in Learning Disabled students’ compositions.
Journal
of Educational Psychology, 82,
781–791.
Graham, S. (2006). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing: A meta-analysis. In C. MacArthur,
S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.),
Handbook of writing research (pp. 187–207). New York: Guilford.
Graham, S. (2006).Writing. In P. Alexander & P.Winne (Eds.),
Handbook of educational psychology
(pp. 457–478). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Graham. S., & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing:
A meta-analysis of SRSD studies.
In L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.),
Handbook of
research on learning disabilities (pp. 383–402). New York: Guilford.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2005).
Writing better. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Graham,
S., & Perin, D. (2006).
A meta-anal
ysis of writing instruction for adolescent students
. Manuscript
submitted for publication.
Greene, J. P., & Winters, M. A. (2005).
Public high school graduation and college-readiness rates: 1991-2002
(Education Working Paper No. 8). New York: Manhattan Institute. Retrieved July 31, 2006, from
http://www.manhattan-institute.org/pdf/ewp_08.pdf
Gregg, L., & Steinberg, E. (Eds.). (1980).
Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Grubb,W. N.,Worthen, H., Byrd, B.,Webb, E., Badway, N., Case, C., et al. (1999).
Honored but invisible:
An inside look at teaching in community colleges. New York: Routledge.
Hand,
B., Hohenshell, L., & Prain,V. (2004). Exploring students’ responses to conceptual questions
when engaged with planned writing experiences: A study with year ten science students.
Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 41, 186–210.
Har
r
is, K., & Graham, S. (1996).
Making the wr
iting process work:
Strategies for composition and self-regulation
(2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Har
r
is, K. R., & Graham, S. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the
evolution of self-regulated strategy development.
Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 251–262.
Hayes, J. R. (2000). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In R.
Indrisano & J. R. Squire (Eds.),
Perspectives on writing: Research, theory and practice (pp. 6-44). Newark,
DE:
International Reading Association. Originally published in C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.)
(1996).
The science of writing:Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27).
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hedges,
L.,
& Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Herszenhorn, D. M. (2005, August 08). In New York’s smaller schools, ‘good year and a tough year.’
New York Times, p. A1.
Hillocks, G., Jr. (1982).The interaction of instruction, teacher comment, and revision in teaching the
composing process.
Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 261–278.
Hillocks,
G
.
(1986).
Researc
h on wr
itten composition:
New directions for teaching
.
Urbana,
IL:
National
Council of Teachers of English.