1
Project Completion Report
Challenging: The social mindset
Focusing: On the critical enablers to participate, stimulate & connect
Creating: Ideas & alternatives for gender transformative behavior change
Cost of Violence against Women (COVAW) Initiative
September 2008 to September 2012
APS Number: M-OAA-EGAT-WID-07-248
2
A human chain formed in the occasion of Women Development Fair in Dinajpur
This report is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency
for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of CARE and do not
necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.
Formal launch of Domestic Violence against Women: Cost to the Nation Report after
publication. In Photo: The Minister (MOWCA), USAID Mission Director, Renowned
women activists, Country Director and Assistant Country Director
3
Table of Contents
Description Pages
List of Acronyms
List of Tables
SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
6
SECTION 2: INTRODUCTION
2.1 Country context
2.2 Background of COVAW
2.3 Target population
2.4 Project period
2.5 Local NGO partners
2.6 COVAW working areas, population coverage
2.7 COVAW management structure
8
8
8
9
9
9
10
11
SECTION 3: KEY APPROACHES
3.1 Use of CARE Bangladesh’s existing community based platforms
3.2 Engagement, participation, and connection of critical enablers
3.3 A non-hierarchical partnership approach with local NGOs
3.4 Engagement of gender equitable men as ‘role models
3.5 Use of communication network and activism
3.6 Extensive use of research for informing program design and intervention
3.7 Participatory monitoring to support the development of action plans for specific
cases
11
11
12
13
14
14
14
15
SECTION 4: DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ACTIVITIES
4.1 Objective 1
4.2 Objective 2
4.3 Objective 3
4.4 Objective 4
16
16
18
18
19
SECTION 5: MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS, LESSONS LEARNED & CHALLENGES
5.1 Major accomplishments
5.2 Lessons learned
5.3 Challenges
21
21
23
24
SECTION 6: RESEARCH FINDINGS & PROMISING PRACTICES
6.1 Key research findings
6.2 Promising practices
24
24
26
SECTION 7: RECOMMENDATIONS
7.1 Evaluation recommendations
7.2 CARE’s recommendations
28
28
28
4
List of Acronyms
ARSHI
Adolescent Reproductive and Sexual Health Initiative
BCC
CBO
Behavior Change Communication
Community Based Organization
CEDAW
Convention for Elimination of Discrimination Against
Women
CiDV
Citizen’s Initiative for Domestic Violence
CMSS Community Management Support System
COVAW Cost of Violence Against Women Initiative
DV
DWA
Domestic Violence
Department of Women Affairs
EKATA Empowerment, Knowledge and Transformative Action
GBV Gender Based Violence
GDP
Gross Domestic Product
ICRW
International Center for Research on Women
MDG
Millennium Development Goals
MOWCA Ministry of Women and Children’s Affairs
NGO Non Government Organisation
NWDP
National Women Development Policy
OCC
One-stop Crisis Centre
PLA Participatory Learning and Action
PROTIRODH Promoting Rights of the Disadvantaged by Preventing
Violence Against Women
SALT
Social Analysis and Learning Team
SAP
South Asia Partnership
VAW Violence Against Women
VDC
Village Development Committee
5
List of Tables
Table 1 Geographic coverage of COVAW
Table 2: Village & hamlet population profile
Table 3: Profile of households as per economic social status
Table 4: Types of community based platforms by implementation districts
6
SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The national policy environment of Bangladesh in relation to violence against women (VAW) provides a positive
picture of women’s rights. Bangladesh has made commitments for fulfilling different international instruments for
promoting and safeguarding women’s rights. The successive governments in Bangladesh have also kept the
issue high on their agenda. National Women’s Development Policy 2011 and Domestic Violence Against Women
Act 2010 are some of the laws and policies enacted recently. However, despite the political priority and
enactment of various laws and policies, women in Bangladesh continue to suffer a high degree of social
oppression and gross violation of human rights.
The Cost of Violence against Women (COVAW) project as an innovative initiative funded by USAID is based on
over two decades of CARE’s experience in women’s empowerment programming and 15 years of experience in
GBV programming. It sought to address gender inequality and domestic violence and communicate economic
and social costs of violence against women in the targeted communities for preventing violence against women.
The primary target of the project was 50 community platforms while the project also targeted secondary
stakeholders like shalishkar
1
, religious leaders, school teachers and role models. The initiative initially started as
a three year project (October 2008-September 2011), and later received a no cost extension through September
2012.
The project was implemented with three partner organizations. The Society for Uddyog worked in Dinajpur and
Jaintya Chinomul Shongstha (Jashish) in Sunamganj, while CARE Bangladesh implemented the project directly
in Tangail. Another partner, South Asia Partnership Bangladesh, replicated the COVAW toolkit in Rajshahi,
Barishal, Potuakhali, Chittagong and Sairajganj in the third year of the project.
The project was provided strategic leadership by a part-time National Project Director, and a full-time team
leader provided day to day management to the three project staff based in Dhaka and six field-based staff.
COVAW implemented community level interventions in three districts. The project worked in four villages in
Tangail, in twelve villages in Dinajpur and eight villages in Sunamganj.
COVAW applied several distinct approaches which were instrumental in achieving the outcomes. Key
approaches included the use of community platforms from CARE’s previous projects, engaging “critical
enablers, employing a non-hierarchical approach to partnerships, engagement of gender equitable men as
positive role models, use of activism and networks, extensive use of research findings and participatory
monitoring. These approaches gave the project leverage and specific advantages for achieving transformative
behavioral changes and helped to create an enabling environment for mobilizing actions of different actors for
preventing violence against women.
COVAW conducted a detailed context analysis which provided insights into the local power dynamics and
gender based violence. This analysis was used by the project to facilitate change processes in the communities.
The project designed Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) exercises to help communities to understand the
link between VAW and gender norms, and to increase their awareness. Interactive sessions were conducted
with the communities using these PLA exercises. The project also engaged men in discussions of socialization of
masculinity and its links to VAW to create a space for reflection and to nurture the idea of equitable relationships
between men and women. Behavioral change communication (BCC) campaigns were organized using various
media channels. Two studies, economic cost study and social cost study, were conceptualized, designed and
conducted. The findings of the studies were widely disseminated.
1
Shalishkar refers to local arbitrators
7
As a result of the activities implemented, COVAW has achieved impressive results in contributing to change in
social norms and practices. According to the evaluation, the COVAW facilitators demonstrated a high level of
awareness on social inequalities, the costs and consequences and root causes of violence against women. The
costing approach helped to demonstrate to the community that domestic violence is not just a private matter, but
rather has consequences for everyone. The project was able to help attain a new level of awareness in the
communities by creating opportunities of reflection and analysis of costs. This critical reflection resulted in
actions that resisted violence against women, as well as fed into the development of BCC and cost analysis
toolkits. Through a strategic approach to engaging men, the project has been able to successfully galvanize
more equitable behavior of men in the home, including men beginning to share household responsibilities with
their female partners, and a reported reduction in violence against women at home.
The learning from the COVAW experience suggests that the project has transferred a complex idea of analyzing
cost and consequences of violence against women into simple tools that communities can use to analyze
information. The communities accepted these tools quite enthusiastically, indicating that community members
may be more willing than expected to examine and discuss such sensitive issues as domestic violence. Men
were also receptive, because the tools generated interest and helped them to visualize the effects of violence
against women in a new way.
The project conducted two studies: Domestic Violence against Women: Cost to the Nation and Seeking to
Understand the Social Cost of Domestic Violence in Bangladesh. The first study tried to assess the economic
cost at family and state levels, while the second study was exploratory in nature to better understand the areas
of social cost that were not captured in an economic costing analysis. The study findings of the social cost study
are expected to contribute for further developing a methodology to assess social costs, and to help in identifying
priorities of future research. The economic cost study found that 2.10% of GDP is wasted due to domestic
violence. The social cost study also highlights impacts of violence on children’s education, fear and psychosocial
wellbeing of survivors, and participation in development activities as important areas of concern as prioritized by
women themselves.
The evaluation has highlighted that COVAW can become a model in GBV programming and recommended that
CARE Bangladesh test the model in different contexts and document the experience. Based on the experience
of implementing this project, CARE Bangladesh feels that there is enormous potential of the model in reducing
violence against women. To harness the full potential of such cost based approaches in contributing to
prevention of violence against women, there is a need to extend the learning to a broader audience and promote
the approach. In addition, more investment needs to be made in understanding the social costs of violence
against women and broadening society’s understanding of the social costs. COVAW has been particularly
successful in engaging men. The experience of engaging men suggests that programs should create non-
threatening spaces and reflective tools for effectively engaging men. One of the promising practices in COVAW
was the couple’s workshop designed to promote non-violent conflict resolution within couples. This has the
potential of becoming an effective group counseling tool once the design of the workshop is strengthened.
8
SECTION 2: INTRODUCTION
2.1 Country Context
The national policy environment with regard to VAW gives a positive picture in support for women’s rights in
Bangladesh. The constitution of Bangladesh recognized that women have equal rights with men in all spheres of
state and public life. In support of this, the Bangladesh Government has signed important documents, including
CEDAW, MDG, Beijing PFA (platform of action), ICPD POA (program of action). The signing of the Declaration
for the Elimination of Violence in the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995 acted as catalyst
that brought the issue of VAW to the attention of the government with more focus. Bangladesh’s 6
th
five year
plan highlights a women’s empowerment and gender equality goal as a priority.
The multi-sectoral program on VAW under the leadership of Ministry of Women and Children’s Affair (MOWCA)
has stepped into its third implementation phase. It has been continuing to oversee forensic laboratory service
with DNA profiling, 24 hour telephone hotline, a package of support service under one stop crisis center situated
in medical college hospitals with all professionals involved including doctors, nurses, psychological counselors,
police, social service officers, and advocates. In addition, it also oversees other wards which attend VAW
survivors, such as emergency, casualty, burn, gynecology, orthopedic, psychology, radiology forensic and other
units. Important Ministries have joined in this initiative coordinated by MOWCA. These are Ministry of Health and
Family Welfare, Ministry of Information, Ministry of Home, Ministry of Social Welfare, and Ministry of Law Justice
and Parliamentary Affair, and Ministry of Education.
Moreover, Government of Bangladesh has also introduced important VAW related laws to improve legal
protection of women in Bangladesh. Domestic Violence Act 2010 and National Women Development Policy
(NWDP) for Women Advancement 2011 were two important legal documents passed from the cabinet.
Alongside the government, a civil society network Citizen’s Initiative for Domestic Violence (CiDV) had been
working hand-in-hand with Government for finalizing the ‘Nation Action Plan’ and ‘Rules of Procedurefor
effective implementation of NWDP, and the DV Act 2010.
However, despite such efforts from a diverse range of stakeholders, women continue to suffer a high degree of
social oppression, and gross violation of human rights. Regardless of the fact that there are specific laws and
policies against VAW, these measures have limited impact in changing the entrenched mindset that accepts
violence as a way of resolving conflicts. The latest Bangladesh Demographic Health Survey (2011) indicated
53% prevalence rates of domestic violence in Bangladesh.
2.2 Background of COVAW
Violence against women (VAW) is recognized as a major violation of human rights. As such preventing and
ending VAW has been a key priority issue of successive governments in Bangladesh. In support of this, relevant
laws, policies, signing of international treaties, and conventions have been put into place. Along with
government, many international and national NGOs, civil society and private sectors have also been working to
address DV.
However, Bangladesh continues to have one of the highest rates of domestic violence in the world. All field
based reports and studies suggests that the situation is unlikely to change until the deeply entrenched social
mindset that accepts violence against women is changed. Against this backdrop, COVAW as an innovative
initiative of CARE Bangladesh based on over two decades of CARE experience in women’s empowerment
programming and 15 years of experience in addressing GBV, started to explore the following key questions:
9
How to address two politically sensitive issues: a) Gender inequalities and b) domestic violence together
in one discussion in a way that enables communities to see gender inequality as the root cause of
domestic violence against women.
How to communicate economic cost of violence with community member, who are neither trained, nor
asked or encouraged to speak with the donor community and policy makers.
How best to develop practical tools and inform key enablers to participate, stimulate and connect to give
GBV sector a fresh impetus for prevention of domestic violence
2.3 Target Population
Primary Target Population
COVAW covered 50 community based platforms (25 women’s groups + 25 mixed sex groups with both
men & women) with a range of 20 30 members in each group
48 Change Facilitators (paid volunteers from local areas) in three COVAW areas
Three cultural folk groups, one in each COVAW area
Secondary Target Population:
At local level: Local interest group (Shalishkars, religious leaders, and school teachers), and positive role
models
At national level: CiDV Network
2
, representatives from MOWCA, media, academia and researchers
2.4 Project period
This initiative originally spanned over three years from October 2008 to September 2011. Later, a ‘No Cost
Extension’ phase commenced from October 2011 to September 2012.
2.5 Local NGO partners
The implementing local partners of COVAW were: Society for Uddog, Jaintia Chinnomul Shongstha, and South
Asia Partnership Bangladesh. Society for Uddog partnered in Dinajpur and Jaintia Chinnomul Shangstha
(JASHIS) in Sunamganj. These two partners were involved since the inception of COVAW for the
implementation of project activities in the respective two areas. South Asia Partnership Bangladesh (SAP) joined
in third year to replicate COVAW cost analysis toolkit in their working areas, namely: Rajshahi, Barishal,
Potuakhali, Chittagong, and Shirajgonj. CARE Bangladesh directly implemented the project activities in Tangail
and therefore, there was no project partner for the area.
2
Citizens Initiative for Domestic Violence is a platform of civil society members and organizations.
10
2.6 COVAW working areas and population coverage
2.6 Table 1: Geographic coverage of COVAW
2.6 Table 2: Village & hamlet population profile
Name of
District
Name of
Upazilla
Number
of Union
Number
of Village
Number
of Hamlet
(Para)
Number of
Household
Population
Male Female Total
Dinajpur
Bochagonj
1
12
85
4071 (53%)
9022
8731
17753
Sunamganj
Derai 1 8 58 2055 (27%) 5980 5923 11897
Tangail
Bhuapur 2 4 20 1525 (20%)
3761 3530
7291
Total
4 24 163 7651 (100%)
18763 18184
36941
2.6 Table 3: Profile of households as per economic social status
Name of village Extreme
Poor
Poor Lower Middle Middle
Upper
Middle
Rich
Total
Household
Dinajpur
1878
(46.1%)
904
(22.2%)
650
(16%)
382
(9.4%)
7
(0.2%)
250
(6.1%)
4071
(100%)
Sunamganj
679
(33%)
874
(42.5%)
0
(0.0%)
345
(16.8%)
0
(0%)
157
(7.6%)
2055
(100%)
Tangail
96
(6.3%)
870
(57%)
62
(4.1%)
355
(23.3%)
0
(0.0%)
142
(9.3%)
1525
(100%)
Total
2699
(34.7%)
2133
34.6)
712
(9.3%)
1597
(14.1%)
7
(0.1%)
503
(7.2%)
7651
(100%)
Division
District
Sub District
Union
Total
Villages
Rangpur
Dinajpur
Bochagonj
Nafanagar
12
Dhaka
Tangail
Bhuapur
Gabshara
Nikrail
2
2
Sylhet
Shunamgonj
Derai
Derai
8
Total
3
3
4
24
Total
population
36941
11
2.7 COVAW Management Structure
Project leadership was provided by a part-time Project Director. Day-to-day project management was ensured
under the direction of a full time Team Leader. In addition, program management and administrative support was
ensured from the Assistant Country Director of Program, CARE Bangladesh.
In addition to the Project Director and Team Leader, there were three staff members in the Dhaka office, who
provided technical support to the ground level interventions and six field based staff were stationed in respective
COVAW areas..
In addition to the above COVAW was supported by an Advisory Committee, composed of NGO and civil society
representatives, who are influential leaders and pioneers in gender based violence work in Bangladesh.
COVAW had community level interventions in three Districts. The project was working in four villages (in two
unions) in Tangail, in twelve villages in one union in Dinajpur and eight villages in one union in Sunamganj. The
intervention in each District was built on village level platforms established by earlier CARE projects of CARE
Bangladesh.
The project worked with local partners in two of the three Districts: the Society for UDDOG in Dinajpur and
JASHIS in Sunamganj with direct implementation in Tangail. Partner staff in the District offices shared the same
office space with CARE staff and took part in the same trainings. The partner staff was included as equal
partners in decision making.
Regular project updates were reviewed through quarterly learning and progress review meetings at head office
with the participation of the full COVAW team. Regular meeting took place with the Executive Directors of the
local NGO partners.
SECTION 3: KEY APPROACHES
Several distinct approaches used in implementation of the COVAW project were instrumental in achieving
project outcomes.
3.1 Use of CARE Bangladesh’s established community based platforms
COVAW used the platforms that were developed by three CARE Bangladesh programs, PROTIRODH, ARSHI,
and SHOUHARDO1, as the main platforms of the project. This approach provided several advantages in
addressing sensitive issues like violence against women. First, CARE Bangladesh and the implementing partner
NGOs had already established a long term and trusted relationship with the community platforms. Second,
participants in each of these platforms had already been exposed to addressing issues like violence against
women to some extent, and were motivated over the years on dealing with social issues to a varying extent.
12
Table 4: Types of community based platforms by implementation districts
Dinajpur (12 villages)
Tangail (4 villages)
Sunamganj (8 villages)
Solidarity group (EKATA, mothers
group): Women focused group
Support group (VDC, VAW Forum,
CMSS, CBO: (mixed group both men
and women)
EKATA (women and
adolescent girls focused
group)
VDC (mixed group both boys
and girls)
Mothers group (women and
adolescent
girls focused
group)
CMSS (mixed group both
boys and girls)
CBO (mixed group both
boys and girls)
VDC (mixed group both
boys and girls)
COVAW covered two community platforms (one women’s solidarity group and one mixed sex group) in each
village. In 24 total villages, 50 of these community based platforms worked to prevent violence against women.
One village in Dinajpur district had a particularly large population size, and it required two extra groups.
On average, each platform consisted of 20 members comprising of 15 adult and five adolescents. These groups
met fortnightly for two hours to discuss, learn, and reflect on COVAW tools - the BCC tool and cost analysis
toolkit.
3.2 Engagement, participation, and connection of critical enablers
The findings from the COVAW context analysis revealed that obtaining social/legal justice is dependent on how
different actors in specific contexts play a part. Therefore, the project took a focused approach for bringing
together the perspectives of critical enablers ranging from community, larger society and program and program
support people simultaneously to influence the social acceptance of violence to resolve conflicts. The community
enablers included community platforms, opinion leaders, elected members and others, while social enablers
included actors with greater power and influence over society. Both critical enablers as well as staff members,
who are themselves a part of the same social context of traditional gender norms and practices, were led
through a process of critical self-reflection on gender, violence, and power in their own lives. It is important to use
the power and influence of all these actors to prevent violence against women and to shift their existing mindsets
by engaging them in reflective practices and dialogues.
In the project, community enablers directly participated in developing, testing and disseminating the COVAW
BCC tool and cost analysis toolkit that helped to understand and analyze inequitable relationships between men
and women. Their understanding and participation contributed to triggering a shift in social norms with regard to
traditional gender behavior and practice. Social enablers and program enablers played a supportive role by
doing action research, generating information, ideas and feasible alternatives. All these actions provided
essential infrastructure for capacity building, communication network and strategic alliance to bringing about a
change in the structural and normative context of communities and institutions. This approach of involving critical
enablers at multiple levels simultaneously forced COVAW to be more creative, responsive, and proactive so that
the focused actions pursued for gender transformative behavior change were well connected and synchronized
13
with a forward-looking strategy for impacting community actions, and influencing implementation of national
policies, laws, and services with regard to domestic violence.
Table 3.2: Critical enablers
Chapter 2: Target population: Critical enablers for addressing Gender transformative behavior change
3.3 A non-hierarchical partnership approach with local NGOs
COVAW has applied a non-hierarchical partnership approach between CARE Bangladesh and local NGO
partners based on mutual trust and continuous learning for improvement. In this approach partner staff shared
the same office space with CARE staff, attended the same trainings, participated in the same action research
and briefing meetings etc. Area allocation and field based activities were distributed evenly between CARE and
Community Enablers
Community based
platforms: Solidarity groups
– women’s groups (EKATA,
mother’s groups) and VAW
support groups mixed
group (VAW forum, VDC,
CMSS)
Local interest group
(shalishkars, teachers,
religious leaders)
Role models
Local folk groups
Elected UP Members
Union/UP government reps
Social Enablers
Program Enablers
Creation of social &
political will
Coordinated social
movement in coordination
with MOWCA, CiDV
network
Mass media
COVAW Advisory
Committee
Social response to
change: risk/triggering
factors, injustice,
discrimination and
marginalization of women
and girl child
Community centered
program design & delivery
Capacity building
Strategic communication
Research, Innovation
through Strategic Impact
Inquiry
Performance Management
through Learning &
Measurements
Pamodzi (Finance), HRD,
IT, Procurement &
Distribution
Connect Synergies at National Level
6
th
five year plan of respective line ministries of Bangladesh Government
National Women Development Policy 2011
Domestic Violence Act 2010
CEDAW (Convention on Elimination of all types of Discrimination against Women)
Right to Information Act
Private Sector Engagement (rights of the workforce)
Human Rights Commission
14
partner colleagues. Partners were treated as equals for raising their voices and participating in decision-making
processes.
3.4 Engagement of gender equitable men as ‘role models
As part of the campaign on domestic violence and social mobilization activities, COVAW highlighted the qualities
of non-violent husbands and men who were supportive to their wives and share household chores. The process
of identifying positive role models started a process whereby women and communities had an opportunity to
discuss these qualities amongst themselves and how men with such qualities can prevent violence against
women. With this, a constructive dialogue began in the community that supported fresh views on men and boys
sharing of household chores side-by-side with women and girls. This discussion opened a new space for
breaking the traditional social mindset around “real men” and fixed gender roles and identities, and helped create
a visible climate of social rejection of intimate partner violence. The positive role models also helped in
disseminating messages to other men and actors in the communities. The engagement of positive role models
helped the project to celebrate positive use of male power, and more equitable power sharing, which helped set
examples to the community of equitable and caring relationship between partners. The use of positive role
models also helped in countering negative labeling of men who started to change their practice by sharing
household chores and not resorting to violence.
3.5 Use of communication network and activism (16 Days of Activism, celebration
of other national/international days) to connect and stimulate critical enablers
from grassroots to national level
This approach has helped to take the learning and evidence beyond the boundaries of the village platform based
activities, to the community and larger society to connect and stimulate the discussion on gender transformative
behavior change in favor of equitable relationships between men and women. COVAW used a wide range of
communication tools, such as a signature campaign, rally, human-chain, village fair, participation of women in
sports (for the first time in their lives), discussion meeting, seminar, performance of local folk group, and essay
competition in schools. Community enablers like religious leaders, teachers, locally elected representatives,
platform members and positive role models were invited to participate in the local events while social enablers
like government representatives, civil society members, NGOs and activist participated in the upazilla, district
and national level. As an immediate outcome of this approach, discussions related to economic and social costs
and consequences of domestic violence received an increased level of attention and understanding.
3.6 Extensive use of research for informing program design and intervention
Unlike other development projects, COVAW relied heavily on using research and study findings to design
program strategies and advocacy initiatives for preventing domestic violence.
Contextual Analysis: At the beginning of the project, the contextual analysis highlighted ways in which gender
justice is affected within each community by the actions of different actors. This analysis helped to inform
strategies of targeting different actors and to define program strategies for gender transformative behavioral
change at the community level. The project also used findings of PLA exercises on masculinity in designing BCC
tools and messages.
Economic Cost and Social Cost Reports: There were only a couple of initiatives in Bangladesh prior to
COVAW that sought to quantifying costs of violence against women, and these studies were limited in scale and
scope.
3
The cost studies conducted by COVAW were unique in that the methodology was designed to assess
the cost to a survivor’s family at micro level, and then at national level identified the cost to the government and
3
Missing Dynamics of Spousal Violence Discourse in Bangladesh: Measuring the economic costs (2010) by CPD and Estimating the Costs.
15
development actors. The findings opened up a new perspective of dialogue around the cost and consequences
of domestic violence, which was still unknown to or unacknowledged by many policy actors. Similarly, the social
cost study made an attempt to contribute to methodology development for future and used a combination of
survey and case study methods. The study also for the first time examined the intensity of consequences of
domestic violence in Bangladesh.
The study findings helped translate the consequences and costs of domestic violence in quantifiable terms, and
demonstrated this use of this costing approach to other stakeholders addressing violence. Though this approach
may be criticized as inadequate to quantify not all effects of violence, this approach has ability to demonstrate to
the public and policy actors the magnitude of the impact of violence against women in society and therefore the
importance of taking measures to prevent it. Further such analysis from other actors will help expand the
discourse of discussions and programming from considering violence against women as solely a women’s issue,
to one that has costs to the family, society and nation.
To explore the costs related to DV that cannot be quantified or covered through the economic cost study,
COVAW conducted a social cost study. However, this was challenging as there is no tested methodology and
there is very little previous work from which to learn. Amidst these challenges, the project decided to conduct a
study to contribute to the development of a methodology and provide an understanding of costs that cannot be
measured in terms of monetary cost. Most importantly, the study design also aimed to look at women’s
perspectives of the effects and their priorities of the effects.
The economic cost study findings were used for advocacy purposes and the understanding on social cost was
used for disseminating social messages.
3.7 Participatory monitoring to support the development of action plans for specific
cases
COVAW introduced participatory monitoring by engaging platform members and local interest groups. Key
indicators selected for monitoring were: total number of marriages that took place in one quarter; number of child
marriages, marriages with dowry, and polygamous marriages; number of Shalish
4
presiding over domestic
violence cases; number of women taking part in the local shalish (arbitration) mechanism; number of cases that
reached a verdict in favor of victim or survivor from the local shalish events.
By tallying raw data at community level, this approach created a practical way to probe case specific information
and to prepare individual action plans for specific cases to take remedial actions. Through this approach,
important opportunities were uncovered for delving into issues on deeper levels than would have been possible
with merely information on general trends, which is a more commonly captured in a traditional monitoring
system. This more thorough understanding was useful in informing existing service delivery/policy mechanisms
to address under-reporting issues; overcoming particular challenges that the government and others face in
preventing, investigating, prosecuting and detaining perpetrators; and taking measures for providing support,
protection, assistance and redress to survivors at local level.
4
Shalish refers to local arbitration.
16
SECTION 4: DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ACTIVITIES
Foundation work: COVAW inception workshop
COVAW started with an inception workshop, which was very comprehensive in nature. The preparatory process
provided a good opportunity to involve program and program support personnel together to design the workshop
content from cross programming perspectives. Good participation was ensured from local NGO partner
organizations and respective programs/projects of CARE Bangladesh. It was a good example of thinking
together in alignment with a gender equality goal. Since its inception, COVAW took a step-by-step approach,
covering multiple levels of activities simultaneously, which gradually resulted in bringing innovation, learning and
capacity building.
4.1 Objective 1: Increase understanding and analysis among communities, NGOs
and government about the link between VAW and gender norms, practices and
behaviors regarding marriage.
Activity 1.1: Conduct context analysis using power, gender and institutional analysis: Led by an
international consultant, a context analysis was conducted in the three project intervention areas by a team of
staff from COVAW and other CARE Bangladesh projects with expertise on violence against women and PLA
analysis. A key objective of this study was to build capacity of COVAW staff to integrate key research methods
into project activities. This gave an excellent scope for COVAW team to learn about PLA techniques and later
use this learning in executing COVAW field based activities on the ground. This process produced a village-
specific context analysis report.
Activity 1.2: Explore the link between VAW and gender norms, practices and behaviors regarding
marriage using participatory analysis methods and tools: The context analysis study revealed the need to
initiate discussion on gender transformative behavior change in the community for addressing the issues of
“control and power practice” in formal and informal settings. There was lack of available materials or methods
available that explicitly dealt with issues of control and power practice in Bangladesh. Based on the context
analysis and PLA exercises on masculinity and in consultation with the education team and Gender Equity and
Diversity Unit of CARE Bangladesh, several topics and tools were developed which were used in fortnightly
sessions with the community platforms. The topics addressed through these sessions included violence against
women and its root causes, traditional attitudes that promote domestic violence, socialization of masculinity,
different costs associated with violence against women, and information from the Domestic Violence Act 2010.
Each session was either aided by PLA exercises specifically designed to address the topic or by cost analysis
tools. Examples of some of the tools used in the field included a 24-hour work analysis for recognition of division
of household work and promoting sharing of household level work by men, and a tree exercise for identifying root
causes of violence against women.
The sessions helped to gradually increase awareness by enabling the participants to identify different types of
violence against women, analyze various causes such as gender discrimination, traditional masculinity, and
costs associated with domestic violence. Based on these awareness raising activities, participants developed
expectation tree collectively, which helped them to envision a society without violence against women and
practical action plans for realizing the vision.
Activity 1.3: Conduct an inquiry to understand the prevalence of VAW: Prevalence has been difficult to
assess due to cultural sensitivities and lack of systems to report it. COVAW has introduced a VAW case
identification format to collect information on domestic violence cases on a monthly basis. The project also
developed a simple MIS (Management Information System) that enables collection of data on VAW incidence
17
from household level at regular intervals and to enter this data into the VAW information tracking system, this
making a link between villages and Union Council, sub district and district levels. Such an information collection
at community level helped to break the ‘culture of silence around the prevalence of domestic violence, and
helped inform planning of where communitiesinitiatives are carried out. Such information generation also helped
address underreporting of VAW by linking village based data with the existing VAW support service system of
the local government office.
The community facilitators were trained to take such information from the households. The facilitators informed
the women about keeping the information confidential, and it was only shared with a small select group during
collation. When the information was given to the sub district and district levels, the names of the survivors were
not given. The information on the nature of violence and number of incidences helped the sub district or district
level authorities to take proactive measures in the communities and request for increased allocation of services
and support for the area. In the cases where women survivors formally came forward to report the case and
sought services, the project and the community platform members supported the survivors in accessing services.
Activity 1.4: Map resources available for addressing VAW: Union-based available resources were mapped
during contextual analysis, and this information was updated frequently. The resource mapping provided a
picture of available services, resource organizations and local actors who could provide different support. In
addition, village specific VAW resources were also identified. Through different initiatives, the project helped to
strengthen the linkage between the resource institutions and community platforms. This was done to make the
platforms aware of the available services and resources so that they could assist the survivors in seeking these
services and resources.
Activity 1.5: Solidarity groups strengthened: In each village, one solidarity group was formed comprising of
adult women and adolescent girls. A total of 26 such groups in three project sites were formed. Solidarity groups
were strengthened throughout the COVAW period to act as change agents through activities such as interactive
sessions and other campaign related activities. As a part of these sessions, the platforms developed action
plans, identified VAW cases using case identification format and provided information on support services to
VAW survivors and to their families. The involvement of the group members on one particular issue, and
opportunities of working together in different project activities to address women’s problem, helped to strengthen
solidarity between group members. Success in implementing action plans and managing different cases
encouraged and motivated groups to proactively work on the issue.
In addition, three-day refresher workshops were conducted on relevant topics annually. This helped to ensure
informed participation of the solidarity group members to question, act and reflect in the fortnightly education
sessions.
Solidarity group members were capacitated to engage in the collective empowerment process to stand up for
achieving gender justice. Groups were engaged with local government offices throughout the project period with
regular briefing meetings, capacity building, celebration of 16 Days of Activism and International Women’s Day
contributing towards preventing violence against women and promoting women’s rights. Three women members
of COVAW community platforms were elected to local government positions, and acted as advocates to
introduce COVAW training for other peer-elected members of the Union Council office. They also nominated
other women platform members to be involved as legitimate members in different Union Council committees.
The platform members also participated in a national annual gathering, “people’s organization conventions,” to
share their work with other community organizations, platforms and groups.
Activity 1.6: Capacity of VDCs, VAW forums and CmSS strengthened to function as VAW support
groups: The capacity of these platforms to analyze issues of violence against women, gender discrimination,
masculinity and costs and consequences associated with violence against women was enhanced through the
18
use of BCC and cost analysis tools. Most importantly, members’ capacity to take action was further reinforced by
supporting them in developing and implementing action plans, imparting knowledge on safe data collection, and
strengthening linkages with service providers.
While promoting these groups as important VAW support groups in the community, the project took conscious
efforts to engage men and boys throughout project activities to address stereotypical thinking on traditional
gender norms behavior and practices. Men and women platform members together learned and discussed the
socialization of masculinity and its consequences for individuals, in the family and community. The exercises on
redefining masculinity played an important role in fostering questions and reflection that helped men and boys to
initiate differently thinking about gender norms and practices, and to nurture the alternative conceptions of
“manhood” involving more equitable relationships between men and women. As part of the strategy for engaging
men, group members participated in one exercise to describe and identify men who demonstrated positive,
gender equitable behavior, such as helping their wives with household chores, and other behaviors and attitudes
consistent with the project’s anti-GBV messages. Later, through a selection process these men were identified
from each village and formally titled asrole models”. They were invited to join in COVAW capacity building
workshops, campaigns and briefing meetings to present their views and champion the issues in different
campaigns. Local resource groups were formed and trained on providing support to survivors and helping
community platforms in seeking their services. Local resource groups were also provided information for
referring survivors to different kinds of service providers locally and to one stop crisis centers.
4.2 Objective 2: Determine the social and economic cost of domestic violence to
individuals, families, communities and state, and development.
Activity 2.1: Conduct cost analysis in consultation with communities, sociologists, economists,
anthropologists and research institutes: Three consultative visits in the community were undertaken with the
consultant to understand the areas requiring examination for understanding costs, such as tangible and
intangible expenditures. The advisory board comprising of sociologists, economists and journalists contributed in
the development of the methodology. The methodology was finalized after a consultation meeting on the
proposed methodology of the study with economists, sociologists and anthropologists.
Activity 2.2: Cost analysis toolkit developed, tested and disseminated among selected networks in the
three districts: The idea of having a cost analysis toolkit came from the fact that while platforms members were
exposed on analyzing various issues related to gender norms and practices in the fortnightly education sessions,
there was need to equip them with a tool to help them to keep the record of expenditures from incidents of
violence. This cost information could be then used for creating compelling arguments in the community for
preventing domestic violence and establishing gender justice. The cost analysis toolkit was printed and
disseminated to NGOs, UN bodies, Ministry of Women and Children’s Affairs and CIDV network members. The
findings from different studies were summarized and packaged in a folder for dissemination at a regional seminar.
4.3 Objective 3: Use evidence on the social and economic cost of VAW to design a
behavior and social change campaign, and influence national level policy-makers to
build a more enabling environment to prevent VAW.
Activity 3.1: BCC campaign developed incorporating various media and community events: Various tools
and media were used for implementing the BCC campaign. District based local folk groups were formed and
trained for disseminating messages on cost and consequences of domestic violence. These groups performed in
the communities on a regular basis and according to the project plans. These performances attracted large
numbers of people of different age groups in the communities. The folk groups also developed and
19
conceptualized Pot Shows(a particular local form of popular folk song) to sensitize the communities on costs
associated with VAW and positive messages around changing practices around violence against women and
domestic violence in particular.
In addition, men’s gatherings were organized, in which token prizes were awarded to positive role to influence
and promote behavioral change among men in particular. Other programs on celebration days were used as
opportunities to disseminate messages on cost and consequences of violence to promote an enabling
environment that condemns violence. Video documentaries were also used to disseminate messages. The BCC
toolkit designed in COVAW was transferred in a flip chart format and disseminated to various actors nationally
including the CiDV network members. Some organizations have shown interest in using the flip chart in their
field.
Activity 3.2: Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) on masculinity’ and positive’ role models for men
and women conducted: Following the contextual analysis, a workshop was conducted to train facilitators and
design tools to discuss issues of masculinity. The participants then conducted PLA exercises in the field that
helped to understand issues of masculinity and ways in which men can be engaged. Based on the learning of
this situation analysis exercise, the project designed tools and topics to engage men in interactive sessions for
promoting transformative behavioral change. Based on this, the project developed a behavioral communication
change toolkit in Bangla to hold discussions on masculinity and how it relates to violence against women in
addition to other topics, such as root causes of violence against women, and ways in which gender
discrimination affects women’s choices, opportunities and positions. The contents of the BCC toolkit were later
transferred and published in flip chart form. For deepening understanding of the issues on masculinity, two other
studies
5
were conducted, to understand the construction of masculinities and to explore the perception of men
who changed their violent behavior towards women. The studies highlighted the challenges in changing men’s
behavior and subtle realities in using approaches such as positive role models.
Through a well thought-out process and extensive discussion on criteria of positive role models, male volunteers
were selected as role models who then played different roles in promoting and influencing behavioral change.
Activity 3.3: Cross-visit within country: Community based women’s groups organized a five-day cross visit at
Khulna Rupantor to see their local governance program. This exchange provided insights into how women’s
groups were addressing governance issues and using different communication tools to promote messages within
the community.
A three-day workshop was organized in Koitta for cross-learning, sharing ideas and challenges, and included
participation from all Change Facilitators, representatives from interest groups, and folk team members from
three COVAW areas, as well as the full COVAW team.
4.4 Objective 4: Social and economic costs of VAW influence national budgets and
implementation/enactments of proposed Domestic Violence Bill.
Activity 4.1: Model developed for calculating national level costs: With the support of a national consultant,
who is also a renowned female economist and member of the COVAW advisory group, a research framework
and methodology was designed to assess the national level costs.
Activity 4.2: National cost analysis report produced: Two separate reports were produced on economic cost
of VAW at individual, family and community level; and at macro level.
5
Blanchet, Thérèse. Constructions of Masculinities and Violence against Women Study, CARE Bangladesh; Dhingra, Jyoti. Transforming
Men-Shifting Gender Relations, CARE Bangladesh 2011.
20
Activity 4.3: Cost analysis report disseminated to participating communities, partner NGOs, networks
and Union Parishads: Cost analysis report was shared in the 24 COVAW operated villages, Union, sub
districts, districts, and in partner NGO areas.
Activity 4.4: Cost analysis report disseminated at various levels, including district and national, through
media, women’s NGOs, universities, and civil society organizations: The national cost analysis report was
disseminated through the following events to maximize its outreach and audience:
o Meeting with COVAW Advisory Committee
o 6 seminars at divisional level
o 4 episode TV talk show, TV broadcasting of COVAW community based program
o National level dialogue with key stakeholders
o 2 media seminar at national level
o Briefing meetings and presentation with CiDV (Alliance Members: Bangladesh Rural
Advancement Committee, Campaign for Mass Primary Education, Mahila Parishad, Naripokkho,
Ain O Salish Kendra, National Women Lawyer Association)
o Seminar with Dhaka University on the occasion of celebration of International Women’s Day
o Briefing meeting with USAID local office, UN & relevant donors
o Meetings and presentation with various departments of Dhaka University and members of
academia who actively work in this area
Activity 4.5: Presentations made to Parliament, Finance Ministry, Planning Commission, Ministry of
Women and Children’s Affairs, and affiliated agencies: A briefing meeting was held with the State Minister
(MOWCA), Director General of DWA (Department of Women's Affairs) and representatives from the multi-
sectoral program to discuss the incorporation of COVAW topics in the training curricula for DWA officials. A
meeting was organized with One-stop Crisis Centre (OCC) on the economic cost analysis toolkit. A seminar was
organized to disseminate the learning from COVAW and to learn from innovative approaches for violence
prevention from South Asia. National actors, such as NGOs, academia and government officials participated in
the seminar, as well as activists from South Asia. From the participants of South Asia, the national actors were
able to learn about strategies that were effective in preventing violence against women and get a sense of
promising future priorities. In the seminar, CARE Bangladesh took an additional opportunity to present the
economic cost study findings in the presence of the Minster of Women and Children’s Affairs and other officials.
(Details of the seminar are given below on page 27).
Activity 4.6: Support advocacy coalition on prevention of domestic violence through the implementation
of a proposed Domestic Violence Bill: COVAW worked intensively with CiDV network on developing “rules of
procedures to implement the bill, and in particular working out the use of COVAW cost analysis toolkit for
claiming compensation for survivors in accordance with one of the clauses under the bill that provides survivors
an entitlement to compensation.
Activity 4.7: Findings of cost analysis presented to Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper stakeholders:
Note: This activity did not take place by June 2012.
21
SECTION 5: MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND LESSONS LEARNED
5.1 Major Accomplishments
Developing a new level of awareness
Usually advocates use normative arguments to deliver messages in programs for preventing and stopping VAW.
The COVAW strengthened the normative arguments by adding a new dimension of cost and consequences of
violence against women using simple tools. It designed well sequenced interactive sessions that helped
participants analyze the causes of violence against women and the cost and consequences of VAW. The project
achieved some astonishing results at the village level. According to the evaluation, the groups at the village level
including the community facilitators demonstrated a high level of awareness on social inequalities between men
and women and different types of gender based violence. Similarly, the members showed a high level of
understanding on different types of costs resulting from VAW due to the analysis tools used in the community
interventions. Members tried to influence other members of the community with the information they gained
through such analysis.
The communities embraced the costing approach with much enthusiasm as it helped them to identify costs from
relatable stories which they see around them and understand that costs are incurred at different levels. This
broadened understanding significantly helps domestic violence to be viewed not as private, individual matter, but
one that affects everyone. This finding acted as an important contribution in furthering the argument for why
domestic violence should not be condoned in the community. The costing approach has proven an extremely
powerful tool for normative change at the local level in rural Bangladesh. The evaluation report suggests that
there may be a cultural aspect to the costing approach, making it particularly effective in the close-knit rural
Bangladeshi communities.
Developed and tested innovative tools: An important contribution for furthering GBV programming
BCC tools: Reducing violence against women has been in the spotlight for several decades in the development
sector. However, there are still lack of tools that systemically address gender inequalities, discrimination and
violence against women and enables normal people to understand the root causes and effects of such
discrimination. COVAW’s BCC tools have been successful in using PLA exercises and cost analysis tools
towards meeting that end. One of its unique features was that the tools created an easy and non-confrontational
pathway to start discussions on masculinity and its link with VAW and domestic violence, which are sensitive
issues for rural communities in Bangladesh. Recognizing the usefulness of the approach, the Department of
Women Affair under MOWCA has incorporated a COVAW topic in their training curricula for the implementation
of Domestic Violence Act 2010.
Cost analysis toolkit: Based on the projects experience, COVAW has developed a toolkit which will enable
development actors to use the process and tools that were followed in COVAW for preventing violence against
women. The cost analysis tools will help advocates, survivors and their families convincingly substantiate
arguments about the loss and damage, either to sensitize people on costs and consequences of VAW or when
claiming compensation according to the recently enacted DV Act 2010.
Political empowerment of grassroots women: Evidence in shifting from individual empowerment to
collective empowerment
COVAW remained persistent, systematic and proactive in promoting women in solidarity groups (EKATA) and
VAW support groups (mixed groups) in the political empowerment process. It encouraged some of the potential
platform members to use their COVAW learning in every single opportunity in their interactions with the
community. They raised their voice during 16 Days of Activism, interacted boldly with the audience after folk
22
performances and answered questions of their neighbors and peers with regard to the safety net entitlements.
6
All these measures helped some members of the groups to compete and win in the last Union Council election.
With this a visible breakthrough is achieved in the current functioning of the local governance system. The
COVAW elected members demanded the introduction of COVAW training in the capacity building schedule of
newly elected members in the Union Council office. These ‘advocates’ are active in creating a political space for
women members to bring their voices to the table, who are otherwise marginalized by their male peers.
Development of database at local level
COVAW has developed a simple MIS (Management Information System) for recording data with regard to
domestic violence cases. In this system it has incorporated a monthly VAW case identification format, and a
measure to find out VAW cases from households of the catchments population, who otherwise do not report their
experiences of violence.
COVAW solidarity (EKATA) group members were involved in filling out the VAW case identification format from
neighboring households. Following that, the COVAW local resource group, comprising of service providers,
opinion leaders and locally elected bodies, provided information about support services to the VAW survivors
identified through this system. These cases were referred to the Union Council support system if local arbitration
failed. This approach has laid a process of database management for strengthening the Union Council office
VAW-related work by identifying VAW cases and linking them with the government-led VAW reporting and
support system.
Transforming men shifting gender relationships: Contributions of COVAW
COVAW initiative made conscious efforts in bringing transformative behavioral change in men. With its campaign
and mobilization activities and behavioral change tools, the project has been successful in becoming a catalyst
for some men to change. The project might not always have been the key deciding factor for these men to
change, but men reported that the process helped them to visualize the effects of VAW on the family level and
the cost analysis tools triggered a reflection process for them. They claimed that the COVAW process has
helped men to re-create the image of women as a productive and valuable half of the population.
The dramas conducted by COVAW were appreciated by all men. These were particularly helpful in assisting
men to visualize the effects of violence at home. Men were able to relate these depicted scenarios to their own
lives and situations. The identification with the events portrayed in the drama helped men relate to the situations
and realize that they too can change and stop being violent towards their wives.
The availability of different groups in the community as a source of support for both men and women was
reassuring. The EKATA groups, the COVAW committees were there to assist the community members. The
involvement of the community in the personal lives of the community members is a positive development
because domestic violence, till a few years ago, was viewed as an internal matter not to be discussed with
outsiders; nor was outside intervention considered an option.
The activities conducted by COVAW and other relevant projects in the communities, have brought this sensitive
topic into the public arena. As a result of this, there is increased risk of public embarrassment for the men who
are violent towards their wives. The men in this study refer to the threat of public shame as a contributing factor
to their need for change.
6
The government of Bangladesh provides different types of assistance in cash or kind as part of its safety net program to extremely poor
families and marginalized women.
23
As a result of the activities, many men started to sharing responsibilities of household chores or reduced the
practice of domestic violence at home, while another group of men with positive attitudes and behavior as
positive role models continue to play a strong role in preventing violence against women and supporting their
peers in their own positive changes. The combination of increased family pressure, the risk of public ridicule and
increased confidence levels of women may be compelling factors for men to change. In some men the change is
also a result of a desire to become better person. Combinations of interventions that include these factors are
likely to be more effective than a single intervention
.
5.2 Lessons Learned
Cost analysis approach: Though one or two studies on cost of VAW have been conducted in Bangladesh prior
to implementation of the project, it was not known how convincing such costing approach would be to the
communities. One of the key achievements of COVAW is that it successfully transferred a complex idea into
simple tools that helped communities to understand the cost of domestic violence and make a convincing
argument to the communities for actions in preventing VAW. The experience of COVAW suggests that
community members even in rural context are eager to examine aspects of cost implications of violence against
women, despite the fact that communities are often considered to lack will/interest in analyzing issues like VAW.
There is a need to further explore why such an approach was so enthusiastically embraced in Bangladesh. It is,
however, apparent that the tools were able to draw more interest of the community members, since the tools
allowed them to take cases that are similar to their immediate environment or have occurred around them it and
provide specific guidance on identifying costs. Aiding communities with such analytical tools for understanding
the cost and consequences of VAW proved to be an effective way for preventing VAW.
Engaging men: Before the project, men in the target areas had never been exposed to such kinds of discussion,
but they were receptive and responded well to the analysis of underlying causes of violence. Making sure that
men were present in group discussions and education processes was initially a challenge. Facilitators tried to
schedule sessions during the evening to increase men’s attendance. However, the deciding factor for men’s
attendance was sparking their interest. The cost analysis tools and 24-hour work analysis tool helped to
generate interest in men significantly and from then the dialogue in the interactive sessions helped them to
continue. The role model concept, which is set to see more gender equitable men as a positive alternative shows
promise to break the status quo and contribute in growing confidence among men on more shared and equal
distribution of power.
Shifts in mindsets of staff and volunteers: Facilitation on the topic of violence requires specific skills and
training in guiding participatory processes. The facilitator must be skilled in guiding this group analysis process to
reveal gender inequalities. However, in order to equip them as effective facilitators, it is important to bring about
a change in the mindset of staff and community volunteers on gender norms and practices. This was done with
intensive efforts on staff capacity building using CARE’s own training modules and staff reflections.
Discussions/information on the manifestation of gender discrimination is not enough: It became evident from
the experience of COVAW that just providing information on forms of violence like early marriage and dowry and
general communication campaigns calling upon people to take action is not enough to bring about a change in
practice. Rather, more effective are processes like COVAW which combined analytical tools that enable people
to understand the root causes and consequences of violence, coupled with behavioral change and community
mobilization tools to influence practice.
Use of community platforms: When using community platforms as a vehicle, it is important to understand ways
in which the membership base affects the participation and influence of the extreme poor. While there is a need
to use the influence of economically better off groups for the benefit of the extreme poor, there is also a need to
look at whether the extreme poor feel comfortable with their participation in the platforms. This comfort level
24
could act as a factor behind re-purposing economic or other kinds of community platforms with large power
differentials among members for addressing sensitive issues like violence against women. Other factors, such as
capacity of the platforms and the extent to which a shared vision of empowerment drives the platforms, also play
an important role in whether or not a platform will be effective in preventing violence against women.
A frequent challenge of GBV programs is the need to build trust between the communities and staff in order to
engage people on sensitive issues and to eventually begin confronting unequal relations in families and
communities. Since COVAW platforms had already engaged on GBV and reproductive health issues through
other projects of CARE Bangladesh, COVAW was able to leverage significant progress made within these
projects to engage more deeply in social change.
More needs to be done to challenge false beliefs surrounding social institutions: The dominant view of
marriage in Bangladesh is that it provides a necessary security for women, and that they are "oshohai"
(disempowered) without a marriage. Men also strongly believe that women tolerate violence because they have
nowhere to go if the marriage fails. There is a need to gradually challenge these notions and beliefs in the
communities, which requires long-term interventions with innovative strategies and methods of communication
for influencing such mindsets. In implementing such work, it is also important to discuss and reflect on the
mindsets of the staff, as well as creating a collective space for women and men to analyze such issues and
reinforce each other’s changed or evolving perceptions.
5.3 Challenges
Engaging men can be a challenge: Men are away during the day and have little time to attend education
sessions. Beyond these practical difficulties, engaging men in discussions on masculinity and inviting them to
question ways to perform gender that lead to violence is not considered priority for many men. Moreover, men
also lacked the skills to engage in open discussions of alternative ways of dealing with a problem with their
partners, and feared stigma if they changed their practice and behavior towards women to be more egalitarian.
Positive role models: The implementation of the positive role model concept in a participatory way was
challenging, as the selection process and criterion became dependent on level of awareness of the community
members about the concept and individuals. It was found that they were either constrained due to lack of
information about practices of men at home or they had little knowledge to analyze the broad gamut of issues
that needed to be considered in identifying positive role models. The other set of challenges is that, though an
individual’s practice may seem like that of a positive role model, it is difficult to determine his actual behavior at
home.
Underreporting of VAW cases: Domestic violence and any other form of violence against women are very
sensitive issues within families and communities. People are usually only open to talking about early marriage
and dowry and not any other issues, such as root causes of VAW. In the initial stages of the project, it became
quite challenging to motivate men and women to talk about domestic violence in their lives.
SECTION 6: KEY RESEARCH FINDINGS AND PROMISING PRACTICES
6.1 Key Research Findings
Domestic Violence against Women: Cost to the Nation: The report Domestic Violence against Women: Cost to
the Nation is based on two separate studies of COVAW initiative. The first was on the societal costs of domestic
25
violence at the individual and family levels, which included a household survey. The second was on the national
cost of violence against women to state and non-state actors.
For the purpose of the study, a framework was developed that identified the social costs, intangible mental and
physical health costs (meaning the costs besides going to the doctor, such as pain), time cost, and direct
monetary costs that domestic violence has on four main levels of society: individual, family, community and to
the state. This framework can be used to quantify the cost of domestic violence in any society using primary and
secondary data.
The first study calculates the cost of domestic violence at family and individual level using data obtained through
a household survey. The survey was conducted in three project intervention sites in Bangladesh: Sunamganj,
Dinajpur, and Tangail. The target sample size was 500 families; however, only 483 responses could be
included in the analysis. The second study served to obtain the expenditures by government and non-
government organizations on addressing issues pertaining to violence against women.
The household survey indicated that domestic violence is a major expense to the natal parents. Over 80% of the
survivors surveyed took shelter in the homes of their parents or other relatives after the attack in most instances
the parents paid the direct costs associated with the domestic violence. The total expenses incurred by the
families in relation to incidents of domestic violence for three districts in 2010 were Taka 57.8 lac, or an average
cost of Taka 11,976 per family per year. Families spent an average of Taka 4,019 on direct medical costs related
to treating domestic violence in just one year. The total direct cost of domestic violence believed to be borne by
the perpetrator’s family was over 50 lac, or an average of Tk.10,384 per family per year. These costs compare
with an average income of an extreme poor household in Sunamganj
7
is Tk.3,680, and Tk.2,875 in North-
Western region.
8
The total cost of domestic violence against women in Bangladesh was extrapolated by summing all of the costs
identified in the study. This includes the amount of marital domestic violence at the individual and family levels,
the expenditure on violence against women by the government and non-state actors. According to this
calculation, the total national cost of domestic violence against women is at least Taka 14,358 crore, or 17.5
billion USD. This is about 12.54% of the government expenditure for year 2010, and 2.10% of GDP.
Study: Seeking to understand the social cost of domestic violence in Bangladesh: In studies usually direct
costs of VAW are measured because only a few methodologies have been developed to address indirect costs.
In doing so, two main types of indicators on violence against women are being developed: indicators that
measure the extent of the phenomenon; and indicators that measure States’ responses to the problem. But data
are needed to assess the long-term psychosocial effects of domestic violence and to demonstrate more clearly
the social impacts of this problem. Methods for collecting data about indirect or intangible costs of domestic
violence, such as using in-depth interviews with survivors and service providers, are useful in this matter. The
study entitled Seeking to Understand Social Costs of Domestic Violence conducted by COVAW is an attempt to
gain insights on social costs of domestic violence that will contribute to developing future research agendas and
areas that require greater attention or understanding for addressing GBV.
The methodology of this study used a combination of survey and case study analysis of reported cases. The
study conducted a sample survey of 110 households and 20 case study analysis. Given the sensitive nature of
asking survivors and their families about gender-based violence, the interview team consisted of field workers
who have developed relationships and built confidence with the many families where violence against women
had taken place. To the best of our knowledge, this household based study on social cost of violence against
7
CARE Bangladesh FSUP-H project baseline information, 2010.
8
CARE Bangladesh SETU project, which targets only the bottom of extreme poor household (Monitoring Information 2011).
26
women in Bangladesh was the first of its kind. The survey made an attempt to capture how frequently various
social costs variables occurred and their intensity.
At an individual level, social costs included personal humiliation, fear, and self-respect, negative impact on self-
confidence, physical injury and pain. At the community level, social costs included both physical and mental
insecurity among women. At the societal level, social costs were in the form of increased vulnerability of women.
At the level of the state, the social costs were mainly in the form of weakening of social institutions, lack of
participation of women as equal citizens, and negative impacts on development of children.
A large proportion of female respondents identified the intensity of consequences of VAW, such as carelessness
to self and children (65%), fear of death (26%), homicidal tendency (40%), self-blaming tendency (40%),
depression and insomnia (46%), as severe. These areas need to be explored in more depth to understand far
reaching consequences for the women, their families and society in order to understand the social costs better.
The small survey validates very strongly that domestic violence affects social and political participation of
women. As a result of their experiences of violence, 84% of respondents feel shy to mix with their neighbors,
72% feel humiliated amongst other women, 69% feel disrespected, 54% get teased by others due to their
experience of violence, and 50% reported a lack of interest in participating in social and development work.
Both the survey and case study analysis indicate severe effects on children of witnessing parental domestic
violence. It also provides evidence that domestic violence affects children both physically and psychologically
and has larger consequences on educational and developmental outcomes of the children. Seventeen percent of
women respondents reported absenteeism of their children from school and 47% reported lack of attention to
studies as a result of domestic violence in families. The case studies collected point out that domestic violence
can create feelings of tremendous vulnerability for women, where mothers feel threatened and a lack of security
for their daughters and opt for early marriage. However, such gendered impact of domestic violence on children
has to be explored more which will help societies to understand longer term social and national costs of domestic
violence.
6.2 Promising Practices
Couple’s workshop: Introduction of a new topic in the capacity building component: There was a felt need
to design an activity that can help couples who are in situations of domestic violence. However, addressing them
alone through a specific activity ran the risk of exposing these couples to community criticisms or negative
labeling. After several rounds of discussion, the team decided to hold couples workshop.
The goal of this workshop was to understand factors within couples that can contribute to non-violent or violent
conflict resolution. The couple’s workshop brought in a new dimension of capacity building in the area of
addressing GBV. It invited both violent and non-violent men in couples to share their experiences, discuss roles,
expectations, and promoted ways of resolving conflicts that did not entail violence. Both men and women
remarked in a follow-up workshop that this event was the first of its kind in their lives. They feel closer to each
other, as the workshop provided an opportunity to learn how to ask questions, reflect, and get to know each
other better in a different environment, as these couples can hardly spend any time beyond their
families/immediate environment.
According to the participants, they were able to discuss some of their problems jointly after the workshop, which
they did not do before. Simple action points generated from the workshop, such as identifying a person with
whom the husband can share issues that may trigger a violent action and help him think about consequences
commitments about not punishing their wives, and sharing household chores, helped couples who were in
abusive relationships move towards more equitable and caring relationships.
27
All reviews and evaluations pointed out that the couple's workshop was particularly effective in terms of changing
behavior of men and reducing spousal violence amongst the couples who participated. A comprehensive design
of such a process could be a useful group therapy tool for men for reducing spousal violence.
Blending Research and Action: The COVAW Initiative Itself: The design of the project combined research
and field programs together, which helped to develop knowledge systematically and then use it for different
programming practices. This kind of approach opened up many credible entry points with institutes, policy
makers, law makers, practitioners and academia, which is now interested in using the data and experience
generated from COVAW for achieving different purposes in preventing GBV. The activists and women’s
platforms felt that generation of such knowledge and evidence would help them in making convincing arguments
for preventing VAW. The Ministry is trying to incorporate some of the training contents into their curricula for
training officials and the cost tools for determining compensation packages for survivors. Other organizations are
considering using the cost categories defined in the research for ascertaining the economic contribution of
women in other areas, such as child care. The UN bodies have also shown interest in using the knowledge and
experience in both their programming and advocacy work.
The initiative not only created many new advocacy entry points for preventing VAW, but also has another
promising element around use of research-based knowledge. Research-generated knowledge usually becomes
confined to very specific group of literate audience people. The COVAW initiative took a relevant research
agenda and identified and understood costs directly from the community members. It also helped people to
analyze the data to understand the consequences through a participatory process. Such practices bring the
exploration and analysis of information in the public domain and helps in consuming information for development
of social knowledge on issues.
Seminar on Preventing Violence Against Women: Lesson From Innovative Practices in South Asia: A seminar
was organized in the last quarter of the no cost extension period of the project to disseminate learning from the
COVAW initiative across various actors engaged in addressing violence against women, and to learn from
various innovative approaches and tools for violence prevention practiced in Bangladesh and South Asia.
Representative from government, academia, donors, women’s platforms, civil society organizations and media
participated in the event. The Minister for Women and Children’s Affairs and the Mission Director of USAID
Bangladesh participated as chief and special guests respectively. The first session was dedicated to discussions
on social and economic costs of violence against women and COVAWs study findings. The women’s platforms
and the Minister appreciated the research findings, which they felt helped them to look at the issue from a
different perspective. This session highlighted the need for more efforts to better understand the longer term
social costs of violence against women. Many effects warrant further exploration, such as women’s withdrawal
from development programs and political participation due to domestic violence, the gendered cross-
generational impacts on children of witnessing or experiencing domestic violence in the household, and long-
term social impacts of psychological effects on women.
The second part of the seminar was dedicated to learning from both Bangladesh and other South Asian
innovative programs on prevention of violence against women. Representatives from Centre for Health and
Social Justice, Swyam and ICRW Asia regional office presented the learning from their innovative practices on
working with men in preventing violence against women and working with communities to prevent violence
against women. Two organizations from Bangladesh, Steps Towards Development and Institute for Cholera
Diarrhoeal Research Bangladesh, presented their work with community volunteers and adolescents in
preventing violence against women, respectively.
The session provided an overview of innovative work in the area of prevention, their challenges and learning
from the initiatives. This provided an impetus to the thinking of current organizations working on prevention, as
28
prevention work is still not strongly grounded in Bangladesh and the work lacks of attention and resources. The
discussions highlighted some of the evolving approaches in preventing VAW, including:
Changing unequal power relations instead of individual practices
Engaging men as partners, a shift from only considering women in programs
Taking a gender-transformative approach (reaching men and boys, women and girls and
transforming gender relations)
The session also highlighted the importance of primary prevention and the need for an integrated approach for
preventing violence against women. The seminar provided a valuable space to discuss challenges and priorities
for preventing VAW. Having participation from other countries helped the participants to understand that though
the work around prevention is challenging, there are strategies that have proven to be effective to overcome
challenges. The participants from other South Asian countries felt that there is a need to develop more
knowledge around issues of economic and social cost, and showed keen interest in promoting the use of such
tools for advocacy on prevention of violence against women. Most actors felt that more work needs to done on
ways in which we can use these kinds of tools through discussions of experts and activists on the ground.
SECTION 7: RECOMMENDATIONS
7.1 Evaluation Recommendations
COVAW has yielded very impressive results as a model for prevention of domestic violence and more
generally as an approach to triggering social change and shifting social norms. This is impressive for any
programming initiative but especially commendable for a project that ran for only three years at the time
of evaluation. It did this through innovation and by building on previous work and relationships. Since
CARE Bangladesh has identified “reducing violence against women” as one of the key change domains
necessary for the empowerment of women, the COVAW model could represent a flagship initiative to
achieve this change. The evaluation recommends that the model be further tested beyond the operating
areas and the learning from implementing the model should be documented for improving the model by
adding components or strengthening existing components. The model should also be promoted to other
actors beyond CARE.
CARE Bangladesh should use the costing model developed under COVAW to influence the narrative,
discourse, and policies around dealing with domestic violence at national, regional, district, and local
levels. COVAW has laid strong foundations for an influential campaign, based on the costing data and
COVAW implementation experience, to reduce domestic violence or increase resources to VAW
programming.
7.2 CARE’s Recommendations
Scale up of the initiative: The achievements of the COVAW initiative in a short period of time are very
promising. After strengthening the participatory monitoring aspects of the design, scaling up the model in
other contexts will spread the practice of effective prevention approaches for reducing violence against
women in Bangladesh.
29
Advocacy on use of costing approach: Using cost based approaches for advocacy in developed
countries has become popular. However, such approach is not usually considered as a useful one for
developing countries, as government spend less money on services to support survivors. The learning
from COVAW suggests that even when expenditure by governments is low for survivor support, such
cost based approaches are still useful for demonstrating the impact of violence against women in the
society. Therefore, there is a need to advocate for the adoption of such cost based approaches as one
useful entry point for making convincing arguments to different stakeholders for the prevention of
violence against women.
To leverage the full potential of cost based approaches, more research is needed, such as tracking
budget expenditure and allocation and coverage of the government services, to compare with the costs
of violence, in order to strengthen a case for increased allocation of resources for prevention.
Developing knowledge on costs associated with violence in different developing countries will also
contribute to a picture of global costs of violence, to push governments to allocate more resources to
prevention and making changes in systems, laws and procedures through international instruments.
Extending the learning to a broader audience: COVAW has been successful in many fronts using
cost based approach at national and community levels, opening up space to talk about domestic
violence in conservative rural areas of Bangladesh and addressing issues around masculinity and
gender based violence. Understanding on the best ways to address these issues is still evolving, making
it important that learning is shared broadly with other actors who are also working on these issues. More
focus is needed on sharing of tools, innovations and challenges amongst actors and across
geographical regions to strengthen the work around prevention. It would also be useful to organize
broader sharing with experts and activists on the use of cost based approaches to better understand the
full advocacy potential the cost based approach.
Enhanced understanding of social costs: COVAW’s experience suggests that communities do come
to realize the costs of violence against women, and that understanding of social costs does make people
feel motivated to take action on violence against women. However, understanding social costs has
proven to be challenging and difficult due to lack of proven methods in understanding different aspects of
social cost. More investment of effort and resources is needed to explore the social costs in-depth and to
increase awareness of the society on social cost of violence against women. Enhanced and widespread
understanding of various social costs of violence against women could galvanize individuals, families,
communities and whole societies to take prevention more seriously and to prioritize actions around
prevention.
Developing resource materials: Currently there is a lack of resource materials on innovative tools and
methodology for preventing violence against women from which organizations could learn from each
other. It would be beneficial if a compendium of tools could be produced which highlights the tools and
approaches used by different actors for prevention of violence against women and girls.
Engaging men: The learning of COVAW suggests that engaging men is challenging but not impossible.
Programs aiming to engage men need to flexible in relation to practical issues such as time of group
meetings. In many cases, COVAW meetings were held either in the evening or weekends. The tools
used to engage men must be able to draw their attention and allow self-reflection. The cost analysis and
other BCC tools of COVAW were particularly effective in engaging men, but most importantly programs
need to create spaces where men and women alike feel comfortable in discussing sensitive issues like
domestic violence.
30
Couple’s workshops: The couple’s workshop was very effective in assisting couples to learn about
different strategies of resolving conflicts in a non-violent way from another and to improve
communication channels. The content of the workshop needs to be strengthened by incorporating more
aspects of counseling, which will make it a more effective group therapy tool.