FIDH-HRC ″Viasna″ – Death Penalty in Belarus: Murder on (Un)Lawful Grounds
great public interest. According to ofcial results (not recognised by the international community,
since the referendum was conducted with gross procedural violations), 80.44% of Belarusians
(4,972,535 people) voted against the abolition of the death penalty, and only 17.93% (1,108,226
people) voted in favour thereof.
Hary Pahaniayla, Chairman of the Legal Commission of the Belarusian Helsinki Committee
(BHC), experienced lawyer, former judge and former president of the Union of Belarusian Defence
Attorneys,
3
explained to the FIDH-HRC ″Viasna″ mission: ″The outcome of the voting on the abolition
of the death penalty during the 1996 referendum should be seen as a result of the political struggle
between Aliaksandr Lukashenka and the Parliament. The President enjoyed broad support among the
population, unlike the Parliament. As a result, people voted in accordance with the President’s opinion
on matters put forward by the President, including with respect to the death penalty. They also voted
against the proposals supported by the Parliament″.
4
Both then and later, Aliaksandr Lukashenka
repeatedly spoke out in favour of the death penalty.
5
Due to serious violations during the referendum, its results were declared unlawful and not
recognised by international organisations, including the OSCE (Organisation for Security and
Cooperation in Europe), Council of Europe and the European Union. (For example, the referendum
campaign used an image of a ″properly completed″ sample ballot showing the option ″against″ the
abolition of the death penalty checked). However, the Belarusian authorities continue to justify the
use of the death penalty by citing the need to respect the people’s will. It must also be emphasized
that at the time of the referendum, the crime rate in the country was rather high, while the maximum
punishment provided for in the Criminal Code - and an alternative to the death penalty - was 15
years of imprisonment. Longer prison terms and life imprisonment were introduced only in 1999.
Furthermore, the referendum was advisory in nature as regards the death penalty, and the
Constitution of Belarus contains a clause allowing for a moratorium or full abolition. It is also
important to recall the 2004 decision of the Constitutional Court of Belarus, pursuant to which
it is not mandatory to call a referendum to abolish the death penalty.
6
Based on its analysis of
Art. 24 par. 3 of the Constitution, the Constitutional Court found that ″the matter of abolishing this
type of penalty or, as a rst step, declaring a moratorium on its use may be decided by the Head of
State and the Parliament″.
Human rights defenders and journalists ghting for the abolition of the death penalty refer to a new
reality, noting that 20 years after the referendum, laws, society and, accordingly, public opinion on
the question of the death penalty have changed. FIDH member organisation HRC ″Viasna″ leads
a campaign called ″Human Rights Defenders against the Death Penalty in Belarus″,
7
launched in
2009 jointly with the Belarusian Helsinki Committee, with the aim of gaining public support for the
abolition of the death penalty in Belarus. In addition to awareness-raising activities, the campaign is
focusing on legal aid to family members of death convicts. Human rights defenders have observed
noticeable changes in public opinion concerning the use of the death penalty.
According to a public opinion survey conducted in 2016 by the Independent Institute of Socio-
3. Hary Pahaniayla was disbarred in Belarus in 1997 for participating in the defence in high-prole political cases.
Throughout his career as a lawyer, Harry Pahanyayla represented defendants accused of death eligible crimes and
lodged individual complaints with the UN Human Rights Committee.
4. FIDH-HRC ″Viasna″ mission interview with Hary Pahaniayla, 30 June 2016.
5. ″Lukashenka: I will never agree to a moratorium on the death penalty, because I am a servant of my people,″ from the
annual address to the Belarusian people and to the National Assembly, http://news.tut.by/politics/288026.html, in
Russian only.
6. “The Use of the Death Penalty as a Form of Criminal Punishment”, http://mvd.gov.by/main.aspx?guid=9091, in Russian
only.
7. ″Human Rights Defenders Launch Campaign against the Death Penalty″, http://dp.spring96.org/en/news/26884.
6