composition table for all the food items on the list was
also being developed so that the dietary intake could be
converted into nutrient estimates. The food frequencies
were reported as never, several times per year, 1 - 3 times/
month, once a week, 2 - 3 times/week, 4 - 6 times/week,
once a day, 2 - 3 times/day and ≥ 4 times/day.
To estimate nutrient intake, the reported intake frequency
of each food on the FFQ was multiplied by reported
portion size and its respective nutrient composition,
summing over all foods. The composition of raw food
items was determined from the USDA.
4
In certain cases
where this information was not available from the USDA,
other local food composition tables were consulted.
5,6
The study was approved by the ERC via 811-Pat/
ERC-07.
Two hundred apparently healthy adult females, aged
≥ 18 years, were recruited through convenient, non-
purposive sampling. Subjects were contacted through
two different approaches. A door-to-door approach was
exercised in community residents in district Karachi
East. AKU hospital employees and their relatives
residing in any part of Karachi were also approached.
Information regarding patients' name, age and ethnicity
was collected by research officer through face-to-face
interviews using a structured questionnaire and para-
meters of weight and height were measured. At this
time, the participants were administered the FFQ and
one 24-hour (h) recall. The interview and blood was
taken after informed consent at a phlebotomy center of
AKU laboratory at Shahra-e-Faisal, Karachi, and main
Clinical laboratory at the Aga Khan University situated in
district East. Furthermore, these participants completed
3, 24-h recalls more, over a period of one year via
telephone calls. Out of the 200 recruited, only 144
provided complete information, consequently our final
sample size for analysis was 144 participants.
Eight milliliters of blood was drawn from the antecubital
vein in the fasting state for biochemical analysis. All
blood samples were centrifuged. Required serum and
plasma stored at -70°C until assayed.
Bone turnover was assessed by measuring N-
telopeptide of type-I collagen (NTx) using an ELISA kit
OsteomarkNTx from Ostex International, Inc., Seattle,
WA. For quality control, low and high controls were run.
Inter-assay and intra-assay variability for serum NTx
assays are 6.9% and 4.6% respectively. Results are
expressed as nanomoles of bone collagen equivalents
per liter of serum (nMBCE/L). The range of serum NTx
levels in healthy females is taken from 6.2 to 19.0
nMBCE/L with a mean of 12.6 nMBCE/L. Serum NTx
levels > 19 nMBCE/L was taken as high bone turnover.
Mean nutrient intakes with their standard deviations
were computed for the FFQ and the mean of the 4,
24-h recalls nutrient estimates. Nutrient estimates were
log transformed as they were skewed positively.
Pearson product -moment correlations between intakes
estimated by the FFQ and those calculated from the
recalls were computed as shown in Table III. The crude
as well as energy adjusted correlations were assessed
for the nutrient estimates between those obtained from
the FFQ versus those taken from the 24-h recalls as well
as NTx, where level of significance was taken to be 0.05
two sided.
Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 17 was
used for all statistical analysis.
RESULTS
The mean age of the participants was 32.8 ± 11.4 years.
The mean BMI was 23.8 ± 4.8 kg/m
2
, height being 156.5
± 5.4 cm and weight being 58.3 ± 11.3 kg. The mean
NTx level was 19.0 ± 8.7 nMBCE/L and the mean serum
PTH level was 73.7 ± 34.7 pg/ml (Table I). Further
results are shared in Table I.
Intake of energy and macronutrients were similar using
the FFQ and 24-h recalls, but higher for FFQ (Table II).
Mean usual daily energy estimated from the FFQ was
Kcal 1643.5 ± 703.1 kcal; daily protein intake was 55 ±
23.3 g, fat 61.7 ± 29.4 g, and calcium 610.7 ± 306.3 mg.
While the mean usual daily energy intake estimated from
the mean of 4, 24-h recalls was 1391.8 ± 365.3, daily
proteins intake was 45.4 ± 13.9 g, fat 52.0 ± 17.9 g,
calcium 462.1 ± 175.7 mg (Table II).
Comparing mean nutrient estimates from the FFQ with
4, 24-h recalls, the correlation coefficient ranged from
0.21 for protein to 0.36 for calcium, while the correlation
for nutrient estimates from the FFQ with NTx ranged
from -0.07 for calcium to 0.01 for energy. The energy
adjusted correlation between mean nutrient estimates
of FFQ with 4, 24-h recall ranged from 0.03 for protein
to 0.32 for calcium. The energy adjusted correlation
Validation of a food frequency questionnaire for assessing macronutrient and calcium intake in adult in Pakistani population
Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan 2014, Vol. 24 (4): 224-227
225
Table I: Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants.
Characteristic Mean SD
Age (year) 32.8 11.4
Height (cm) 156.5 5.4
Weight (kg) 58.3 11.3
BMI 23.8 4.8
NTx (number/L) 19.0 8.7
Serum PTH (pg/ml) 73.7 34.7
SD = Standard Deviation; BMI = Body Mass Index; NTx = N-telopeptide of type-I collagen;
PTH = Parathyroid hormone.
Table II: Mean daily nutrient intakes estimated by the FFQ as the
24-h recalls.
Variables FFQ Mean of 4, 24-h recalls
Mean SD Mean SD
Energy (kcal) 1643.5 703.2 1391.8 365.3
Protein (g) 55.0 23.3 45.4 13.9
Fat (g) 61.7 29.4 51.9 17.9
Calcium (mg) 610.7 306.4 462.1 175.7
FFQ = Food Frequency Questionnaire; SD = Standard Deviation.