Preface
Few would dispute that the synthesis of esters has played a most important role in
organic synthesis from its infancy. This importance stemmed from its utility in di-
verse fields both in the laboratory and in industry. Ester moieties, irrespective of
whether acyclic or cyclic, constitute major backbones, as well as functional groups of
chemical significance, in numerous natural products and synthetic compounds. The
essential feature of esterification that particularly distinguishes it from other reac-
tions lies in its broad utilization in industry. Just a brief chronological look quickly
reminds us of aspirin (acetyl salicylic acid), fatty acid esters, polyesters, macrolides,
and so on. In addition to being essential molecular components in their own right,
ester groups also play versatile temporary roles in organic synthesis for protection of
carboxylic acids and hydroxy groups. The synthesis of natural products, especially
macrolides, sugars, and peptides, depends heavily on acylation technology.
Being carboxylic acid derivatives, esters are largely produced from the reactions
between the corresponding acids and alcohols. Transformation from one ester into
another (transesterification) is also useful. On the other hand, since esters are also
derivatives of alcohols, ester synthesis is also important from the standpoint of alco-
hol chemistry, such as acylation. A variety of routes to arrive at esters are therefore
feasible, and numerous methods have been reported. Surprisingly, though, no book
focussed solely on “esters” has been available up to now, esterification or transesteri-
fication usually being included in many books as a sub-class of functional group
transformations. Obviously, this is not a fair treatment if the central position of
(trans)esterification in organic synthesis is taken into account. Why did such biased
circumstances arise? A number of reasons can be counted immediately, but only a
few representatives among them are given here. Since (trans)esterification has such
a long history and the reaction itself is simple, many people, especially in academia,
take it for granted that little room is left for further scientific improvements. In in-
dustry, on the other hand, (trans)esterification still has permanent significance and
so many new technologies remain undisclosed, as know-how. Since the utility of
(trans)esterification has spread into diverse fields, it is indeed laborious to cover the
whole. As such, even people involved in the (trans)esterification field, regardless of
whether in academia or in industry, have rather limited knowledge about what is
going on outside the very narrow disciplines close to them. Despite such undesirable
circumstances, (trans)esterification has in fact been, and is still undergoing, exten-
V