Office Of Ministerial Evaluation

Office Of

Ministerial Evaluation

Department of Personnel Services

RESOURCES

FOR

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

WITH

PARISH PERSONNEL

2009 EDITION

Resources for Performance Management

With Parish Personnel

CONTENTS

Page

Introduction .............................................................................................................................3

Section I The Performance Management Process ...........................................................[4-15]

A........ Foundations for Performance Management.........................................5

B........ Planning for Performance ....................................................................6-7

C. Reviewing Performance ......................................................................8-9

D. Rater Errors .........................................................................................10

E. Non-Evaluative Approaches to Performance Discussion ....................11-12

F. Commonly Asked Questions about Performance Management...........13-15

Section II Tools and Forms for Performance Management ............................................[16-55]

A. Performance Plan.................................................................................17-18

B. Ministry Review Feedback ...................................................................19

C. Specific Ministry Review Forms

Pastoral Associate .........................................................................20-23

Director/Coordinator of Religious Education ..................................24-27

Director/Coordinator of Youth Ministry............................................28-31

Director of Music.............................................................................32-35

Deacon ..........................................................................................36-38

D. General Ministry Review Forms

Option A..........................................................................................39-42

Option B..........................................................................................43-45

E. Support Staff Review Form ..................................................................46-49

F. Inter-Staff Feedback Forms

Option A .........................................................................................50

Option B .........................................................................................51-52

G. Position Description..............................................................................53-55

Section III Materials in Spanish ........................................................................................[56-73]

A. Guía Para La Revisión de Rendimiento de Trabajo ............................57-58

B. Revisión del Ministerio – “Feedback” ...................................................59-60

C. Ministerio En General

Option A (Revisión del Rendimiento del Ministerio) ......................61-63

Option B (Revisión Annual Parrooquial)........................................64-68

D. Revisión del Rendimiento – Personal de Asistencia ............................69-72

E. Plan de Rendimiento ............................................................................73

Section IV Annual Review of Priestly Ministry..................................................................[74-87]

A. Annual Review of Performance of Ministry for Priests .........................75-77

B. Alternate A............................................................................................78-81

C. Alternate B............................................................................................82-85

D. Personal Reflection ..............................................................................86-87

INTRODUCTION

“There are different kinds of spiritual gifts, but the same Spirit; there are different

forms of service but the same Lord; there are different workings but the same God

who produces all of them in everyone. To each individual the manifestation of the

Spirit is given for some benefit.” (1 Cor. 12, 4-7)

Performance management within an ecclesial context is an invitation to explore how our gifts

are being offered in service of the Lord. The purposes of such a process are:

focus: re-centering ourselves in mission; integrating personal, professional and parish

goals

learning: identifying strengths and areas for growth which will increase our effectiveness

accountability

: assessing how well we have fulfilled our agreed upon responsibilities

The following resources are designed to help parish personnel focus, learn and be

accountable. The book includes background materials related to the processes involved in

performance management as well as tools which are meant to assist staff members in an

analysis of their performance in light of their goals and responsibilities. Some of the resources

are also available in Spanish (Sp).

These performance management resources reflect the philosophy that performance

management is distinct from the salary increase process. Performance management is geared

to continuing effectiveness and ongoing development for one’s ministry or work. It is only one

of the factors to be considered in determining salary adjustments. (See Archdiocesan

Compensation Guidelines for further discussion of salary adjustments.)

It is our hope that these resources are helpful to parish personnel. Your feedback and ideas

regarding the resources are most welcome. If you have feedback to offer, please call the Office

of Ministerial Evaluation (312) 534-5265 with your ideas, or e-mail them to

[email protected].

Most of the forms are available through the Archdiocesan website www.archchicago.org

or by

e-mail.

SECTION I

THE PERFORMANCE

MANAGEMENT

PROCESS

FOUNDATIONS FOR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

Performance Management supports Parish and Archdiocesan overall goals by linking the work of

individual staff members to overall mission of the parish or Archdiocese.

Performance Management involves:

 Having a clear understanding and statement of the mission and goals for the parish and

Archdiocese.

 Analyzing the objectives and goals for each area of ministry or position and ensuring that they

relate to the overall goals of the parish and Archdiocese.

 Analyzing each staff member’s skills and assignments as they relate to parish or Archdiocesan

goals.

 Clearly communicating performance goals and expectations to each staff member (team) and

gaining agreement on those goals and expectations.

 Recognizing and acknowledging the good performance of staff members.

 Recognizing where performance needs to be improved

 Providing staff members with the necessary support to improve.

In this context, it is helpful to reflect on and discuss the following questions:

 What is the overall mission or vision of the parish/Archdiocese?

 What are the long-term goals and objectives?

 What are the short term or annual goals and objectives of the parish/Archdiocese?

 What are the goals and objectives of each ministry or position?

 What are the individual work goals and objectives for each staff member?

The Performance Management process builds on these understandings.

Performance Management Cycle

Preplanning

Performance and

Development Plan

Implementation

(Interim Feedback &

Coaching)

Implementation

(Interim Feedback &

Coaching)

Formal

Annual Review

Salary

Review

Based on

Effective Performance Management

PLANNING FOR PERFORMANCE

An effective performance management process calls for the establishment of goals or objectives that

we hope to accomplish in the coming year, as well as standards by which we can measure the

achievement of the goal or objective. A goal or objective is simply a statement of results to be

achieved. Establishing goals and objectives for performance and professional development is a way of

enhancing our contribution to ministry and to the parish or place of work. It is also a way of opening

ourselves to new opportunities.

Goals and objectives maximize effectiveness and move us into the future. They confirm our mutual

understanding of expectations and identify our contributions to the parish or place of ministry.

Performance goals or objectives are statements of the specific, measurable results that one hopes to

achieve through ministry or work during the year ahead. These goals are related to the responsibilities

of one’s position description and are congruent with the vision/mission and goals of the parish or place

of ministry. Someone who has responsibility for assisting couples in preparation for the sacrament of

marriage might set a goal to revise the existing marriage preparation program. A parish secretary might

set a goal to computerize the filing system for parish records. A maintenance person might designate

several major repairs as goals to be accomplished. An effective goal or objective includes the standard

by which accomplishment can be measured or determined as well as a time-line for completion.

Professional development goals are clear, concrete statements of what one hopes to learn or of

skills to be developed in the coming year in order to minister or work more effectively. In a parish or

ministry setting where a number of people speak Spanish, a helpful development goal might be to learn

Spanish. Where computers or new software are being purchased, learning how to operate the

computer or use the software would be an appropriate development goal. Taking a course or workshop

in Scripture, accounting, Canon Law or management would also be examples of development goals.

Some annual development goals might be steps in the accomplishment of a longer-term goal such as

achieving proficiency in Spanish or completing a certificate or degree program.

The following suggestions may be helpful in establishing performance and development goals or

objectives.

In preparing to set goals or objectives, consider ℵthe mission and goals and needs of the parish

or place of ministry; ℑthe responsibilities outlined in the position description; ℜ the insights

gained through self-assessment and discussion with the reviewer(s).

Identify the key results that are to be achieved through the ministry or work. These should relate

to critical responsibilities of the position. Also identify skills or areas of learning which would

increase the ability to minister or work effectively.

Create goals or objectives that express these results in specific, measurable terms. Make the goals

”S.M.A.R.T.”

Specific

The goal is written in clear, concise, understandable language. Someone who is

not familiar with the job can easily understand it.

PLANNING FOR PERFORMANCE

Measurable

The goal or objective establishes quantitative criteria wherever possible. It

indicates how much one will do: develop one program; input 50% of the records;

prepare 20 couples for marriage; learn the fundamentals of Microsoft WORD.

There may be times when it is hard to quantify. In these situations it may be

preferable to describe what will be observed: a more welcoming atmosphere;

clean washroom facilities (to the supervisor’s satisfaction, or based on a

complaint rate); increased participation by the congregation who attends Sunday

liturgy.

Achievable/Agreed

The goal or objective is achievable in relation to one’s available time, resources,

knowledge, experience, ability etc. On the other hand, it should be as challenging

as possible.

In addition, agreement on goals or objectives greatly strengthens ownership and

responsibility, and increases the likelihood that they will be accomplished.

Results-oriented

The goal indicates what is to be achieved. It starts with a verb like “develop,”

“implement,” “design,” “increase” etc. and is geared to accomplishing something

that contributes to the overall parish or workplace goals and plans. It specifies

“what” and “when,” not “why” and “how.”

Time-framed

The goal should identify a target date.

Examples of performance goals might be:

 To incorporate suggestions from married couples into the marriage preparation program by

January of this year

 To attend 90% of the Parish Pastoral Council meetings this year

 To develop a working liturgy committee by the end of this year

 To repair and paint all windows in the rectory by December

 To spend the first half hour of the day in personal prayer

 To hire a competent business manager by April

 To set up and begin using a database for keeping the sacramental records of the parish

 To vacuum and dust the parish offices twice a week

 To complete an audit of the parish finances by October

 To establish position descriptions for each of the parish employees by September

 To transfer the coordination of the catechumenate formation to the new catechumenate

director by June

The implementation of each of these goals might take several steps. If you wish, these can be

articulated in a more detailed action plan that outlines steps toward achieving the goal and breaks

down the goal into manageable segments.

The performance plan form in Section II may be used to record performance and development goals or

objectives for the coming year.

REVIEWING PERFORMANCE

1. Purpose of Performance Review Meeting

Successful fulfillment of the mission of the local Church depends on the quality and dedication of

personnel who are committed to excellence and continuous improvement of their own performance.

One tool that is helpful in creating an environment that supports effective performance is a system of

performance management. Effective performance review and planning meetings are important steps in

which both the supervisor and minister/employee are able to establish clear performance expectations

and monitor performance against those jointly agreed upon standards. Performance review discussion

reinforces positive performance while addressing areas that need improvement.

2. Planning for the Meeting

The following steps are part of the preparation process:

Mutually schedule a specific time and place for the meeting. Allow adequate time. Prevent

interruptions. Find a private meeting space.

Supervisor Minister/Employee

• Prepare your assessment based on your

observations regarding the minister’s/

employee’s accomplishments and skills in

light of the parish mission and goals, role

description and specific objectives.

• Review the minister’s/employee’s self-

assessment and feedback from those served

and prepare your feedback, incorporating

specific examples of behavior into the

feedback.

• If ratings will be used, determine proposed

ratings and note rationale for your selection.

• Review performance objectives and prepare

supplemental objectives if necessary.

NOTE: In preparing for performance review, it is

important to avoid tendencies that stem from

personal bias. These are noted later in the section

entitled, “Rating Errors”.

• Do a self-assessment, preparing background

information about accomplishments and self-

assessment of skills in light of the parish

mission and goals, role description and

specific objectives.

• Use specific examples and incorporate

feedback from those who are served by the

ministry/work.

• Draft possible performance objectives for the

coming year.

• Submit self-assessment and proposed

objectives to supervisor prior to the meeting.

• Shortly before the meeting summarize the

accomplishments and challenges of the year.

3. Conducting the Review and Planning Meeting

The following steps are an important part of conducting a performance review and planning meeting:

a. Start the meeting.

Supervisor Minister/Employee

• Plan your opening remarks in order to put

yourself and the minister/employee at ease.

• Review the purpose of the meeting.

• Approach the discussion as a two-way

conversation.

• Take the meeting seriously.

• Indicate your objectives for the meeting.

• Approach the meeting as a two-way

conversation

• Take the meeting seriously.

REVIEWING PERFORMANCE

b. Proceed with minister/employee self-assessment.

Supervisor Minister/Employee

• Listen carefully.

• Ask questions for clarification.

• Ask open-ended questions to encourage

dialogue.

• Summarize what the minister/employee said.

• Refrain from judging or contradicting the

minister/employee during the self-

assessment.

• Present your self-assessment.

• Clarify as necessary, using specific

examples to illustrate your statements.

c. Incorporate supervisor assessment.

Supervisor Minister/Employee

 Begin your assessment in the context of the

minister/employee’s self-assessment.

 Focus on the areas of agreement first.

 Discuss areas where your assessment differs.

Explain your rationale.

 Offer feedback, not criticism.

 Use non-evaluative approaches.

 Do not try to reach consensus regarding

differences, but focus rather on

understanding the review.

 Focus on performance, not the person.

 Be open and honest; accept openness and

honesty.

 Listen carefully.

 Ask questions for clarification.

 Ask for specific examples of behavior when

seeking clarification of feedback.

 Summarize what the supervisor has said.

 Focus on understanding the review so that

you can work toward improved performance.

 Be open and honest.

d. Plan for the following year. Both supervisor and minister/employee

 Discuss the gaps between expectations and accomplishments.

 Analyze. Employ problem-solving techniques.

 Address constraints on achievement of goals, responsibilities.

 Mutually set specific objectives and goals.

 Modify position description if necessary.

 Plan follow-up meetings as necessary.

e. Close the meeting.

 Summarize the conclusions and next steps.

 It is quite possible that performance review, analysis and planning for the future might not be

completed in a single meeting. It is also helpful to have some time between the review and

analysis of performance and the tentative formulation of new goals or objectives, and the

finalization of a plan.

f. Both the minister/employee and the supervisor provide on-going feedback to each other regarding

performance throughout the year.

Feedback describes behavior and provides information so that the minister/employee can make a judgment

based on the information. Criticism is judgmental, creates defensiveness and is negative in tone.

See examples on following pages, “Non-Evaluative Approaches to Performance Discussion.”

RATER ERRORS

RATING ERRORS

ERROR DEFINITION EXAMPLE

Attractiveness effect

The well-documented

tendency for people to

assume that people who are

physically attractive are also

superior performers.

Samuella rated sales representatives who were tall, trim and

attractive higher than those who were only average in their

appearance, even though there was no significant difference in the

quality of their work.

First Impression error

The tendency to make an

initial positive or negative

judgement of another person

and allow that first

impression to color or distort

later information.

When Rachael took over her department, she noticed one staff

member who was going through a divorce, performing poorly. Within

a month that staff member’s performance had improved to its

previously high level, but Rachael’s opinion of the individual’s

performance remained negative. She did not recognize the

improvement.

Halo/horns effect

Inappropriate generaliza-

tions from one aspect of an

individual’s performance to

all areas of that person’s

performance.

Jeff was excellent in his presentation skills. He received rave

reviews whenever he gave talks or workshops. His supervisor rated

him as F

AR EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS in all areas, even though he did

not communicate effectively with colleagues on the staff, and was

consistently late with the projects he was working on.

Similar-to-me effect

Tendency of individuals to

rate people who resemble

themselves more highly than

they rate others.

As a manager, Brett, was logical, detail-oriented, and prompt to

respond to deadlines. He unwittingly rated several staff members

who also had these qualities higher overall than others whose

strengths included creativity, visioning, and initiating new endeavors,

but who were not always on time with their work.

Central tendency

Inclination to rate people in

the middle of the scale even

when their performance

clearly warrants a sub-

stantially higher or lower

rating.

Because he does not like to compare staff with one another, and is

not comfortable with confrontation, Harold rated all of his staff

members as M

EETS EXPECTATIONS, despite significant differences in

their performance.

Negative and positive

skew

The opposite of central

tendency. The rating of all

individuals as higher or

lower than their performance

actually warrants.

Susan believes that everyone needs some improvement, so she

does not give any ratings higher than M

EETS EXPECTATIONS for even

the highest performers. Al believes that he has hired only

exceptional staff menders, so he gives only ratings of E

XCEEDS OR

FAR EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS.

Attribution bias

Tendency to attribute

performance failings to

factors under the control of

the individual and

performance successes to

external causes.

When a member on Harriet’s staff falls behind in his or her work,

Harriet attributes it to poor organizational skills on the part of the

staff member, even though there may have been an extraordinarily

high workload, or an unexpected emergency that took additional

time. On the other hand, when a staff member stays on top of

things, she feels that it is because of her exceptional leadership

skills.

Recency effect

Tendency for minor events

that have happened more

recently to have more

influence on ratings than

major events of many

months ago.

Conceptión kept no records or notes regarding the quality of her

staff’s work. When it came time for reviews, she relied on examples

from only the previous two months. She had completely forgotten

major accomplishments and consistently effective performance from

earlier in the review period.

Stereotyping

Tendency to generalize

across groups and ignore

individual differences.

Juan is a quiet, reserved person. Yet when he is on the phone with a

pastor or parish minister trying to resolve a problem, he is very

effective in listening and helping to resolve the issue. When he does

offer his opinion in a staff meeting, it is usually quite insightful.

However, because of his reserve, his supervisor rates his

performance lower than that of other consultants who are more

vocal.

Corporation, 15303 Dallas Parkway, Suite 645, Addison, Texas 75001-6725. Used with permission.

NON-EVALUATIVE APPROACHES TO PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION

For a performance review or planning meeting to be effective in affirming and strengthening

performance, it is important that a climate of openness be maintained. This is not usually difficult when

affirming good performance. However, when one must confront poor or marginal performance, it is

sometimes more difficult to prevent a spirit of self-defensiveness from pervading the discussion. While

it might be impossible to completely eliminate defensiveness, the following non-evaluative approaches

might prove helpful in addressing sensitive issues.

EVALUATIVE NON-EVALUATIVE

Evaluative Descriptive

• You simply can’t keep making these stupid

mistakes.

• Oscar, you’re tactless and undiplomatic.

• You’re too belligerent when dealing with co-

workers.

• The budget deficit is your fault. You ignored the

accounting procedures.

• We’re still having a problem reducing the number

of errors in our parent newsletter.

• Some people interpret your candor as hostility.

• Many of the staff members perceive your attitude

to be belligerent.

• This budget deficit appears to involve some

differences in interpreting our accounting

procedures.

Control Problem Orientation

• Mary, I’d like to see you working on files next

week.

• I think the only answer is to move your office over

to the school.

• I think my suggestions are clear, so why don’t you

get back to work.

• Here’s what you must do to reduce mistakes.

• Mary, in light of next week’s schedule what do you

see as your priorities?

• One possibility is to move your office over to the

school. Would that help?

• Let’s think about these suggestions and get back

together next week after you’ve considered them.

• What do you think we might do to reduce

mistakes?

Neutrality Empathy

• I really don’t know what we can do about it.

• I didn’t know that.

• You could have something there, but let’s get back

to the real problem.

• At this point, I can’t think of anything, but I know

where we might look for help.

• I wasn’t aware of that. Let me make sure I

understand.

• I’m not certain I understand how that relates to this

problem. Why don’t you fill me in before we go on?

Based on “Non-evaluative Approaches to Performance Appraisals” by Les Wallace, from The Performance

Appraisal Sourcebook, published by Human Resource Development Press. Originally published in Supervisory

NON-EVALUATIVE APPROACHES TO PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION

Superiority Equality

• Sally, I’ve been handling this problem for 10 years.

I ought to know what will work.

• I don’t think I need to give you all the background.

Why don’t we just handle it this way for now?

• The staff thought this policy through pretty

thoroughly.

• You secretaries really don’t need to know the

rationale.

• I’m being paid to make these decisions, not you.

• This idea has worked before. Do you think it might

work in this case?

• You might find some of the background

information helpful, so let me fill you in a bit.

• We have discussed this policy at the staff meeting

and I’m interested in your reactions and thoughts.

• Let me go over the rationale with you. You might

find it helpful.

• I’ll have to make the final decision, but why don’t

you get your suggestions in to me right away.

Certainty Professionalism

• I know what the problem is. I don’t think I need

another opinion.

• This is the way we’re going to do it.

• I’ve thought these suggestions through thoroughly,

so let’s not waste time arguing.

• I have a view of the problem, but I’d be interested

in what you think.

• Let’s try this for a couple of weeks; then we can

reconsider based on that experience.

• I’ve tried to think these suggestions through pretty

thoroughly. Can you see anything I may have left

out?

A move toward non-evaluative approaches should result in:

 Analysis instead of appraisal

 Improved creativity in solving problems, due to greater employee input

 Less supervisory reluctance to discuss performance problems

 A clearer understanding by the employee of why and how he/she needs to change work

behavior

 The growth of a climate of cooperation, which increases individual and group motivation to

achieve performance goals

 Greater employee self-reliance, which improves the individual’s ability to diagnose problems and

react quickly with less supervisory assistance

Q & A

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS—AND SOME RESPONSES

How do I review people who report to me but

whom I do not often observe “in action”?

 Establish goals and benchmarks of

performance.

 Have them do self-assessment in light of goals

and benchmarks.

 Encourage honesty through a non-judgmental

atmosphere—an atmosphere where mistakes

are seen as opportunities for learning and

growth.

 Ask them for names of persons who can give

feedback regarding their work, and ask for

permission to consult with them. Incorporate

feedback from those being served by the

person—staff served by support staff,

catechists/parents served by DRE, ministers

and others served by Pastoral Associate.

 Schedule regular meetings to stay up-to-date

with one another.

How do I communicate feedback that I have

received from others about someone whom I

supervise, but have not directly observed?

 First, ask the person offering the feedback to

you if they would share it directly with the

person.

 Ask the person offering the feedback to you if

it’s OK if you share it with the person.

 Distinguish between one incident and many

reported incidents that add up to a pattern of

behavior.

How do I share negative feedback in a

constructive way?

 Set the context. Note positive aspects as well

as negative.

 Use “I” messages.

 Be honest. Use non-judgmental language.

Describe behaviors and effects of behaviors.

 Back up the feedback with data.

 Solicit the recipient’s perspective on the issue

and in developing a plan.

Who should review whom?

 This depends on reporting structure.

 Ordinarily ministerial personnel report to the

pastor. Support staff sometimes report to

ministerial personnel, sometimes to the

business manager.

 Sometimes collaborative reviews may be

necessary if someone does work for several

persons.

 Teams might want to regularly review how

they relate to one another, how they make

decisions, how effective they are.

How does one facilitate the evaluation

discussion so that it stays focused and on

track?

 State purposes and goals of discussion.

 Acknowledge the digression and offer to talk

about it at another time or at the end of the

meeting if time permits.

 Make a list of important side issues if

necessary.

 Use assertion to re-track the conversation.

 Use focus questions based on the review, the

plan, and the work environment. What New

and Seasoned Managers Would Like to Know

from Their Staff, Colleagues, Co-Workers,

available from the Office of Conciliation, has

several helpful questions.

How does the supervisor respond when an

employee defends a critiqued behavior by

comparing it with that of other employees?

 “That is an interesting insight, observation, and

I will consider your information, but the

purpose of this discussion is to talk about how

this impacts your work/ our working

relationship.”

 “It’s no more appropriate for me to discuss

another employee with you than it would be to

talk about you with him/her.”

 The issue may have been addressed, but it is

not appropriate to tell the employee this.

Is it ever appropriate to have a third party

present during a performance review meeting?

 Not usually—ordinarily this might happen in a

disciplinary or termination meeting, or

Q & A

 briefly, if an employee refuses to sign the

review.

What kind of documentation is appropriate,

helpful and/or necessary to support the

assessment offered in a performance review?

 Examples of good or poor work, dates and

times of occurrences—all of which have been

previously mentioned to the employee at the

time of occurrence

 Specific, non-judgmental

 Avoid using always, never

What if we can’t finish reviewing and planning

in one meeting?

 This is highly likely. It is often good to have

time for ideas to simmer between review and

tentative planning, and the finalizing of a plan.

 Schedule a follow up meeting and stick to it.

 Perhaps the staff member can draft the

performance plan, based on the discussion, in

preparation for that meeting.

What is the role of goals or expectations that

are set as part of the performance

management process?

 Set specific direction for the staff member for

the coming year.

 Provide targets for what is to be accomplished.

 State clearly what results are expected. Clarify

expectations.

 Provide a concrete framework for assessing

performance.

 Provide focus.

 Create a road map before the journey is

begun.

How does a supervisor handle the situation

when an employee does not agree with his/her

evaluation?

 Begin by determining what both can agree on.

 Clarify where the differences lie.

 Respect their right to disagree. Listen to their

perspective.

 Modify your perspective if appropriate. If not,

reaffirm your expectations.

 Help employee to understand your mindset—

the importance you place on the behavior,

your rationale.

 Encourage the person to write his/her

differences in opinion and include support

information.

 Set another time to talk if necessary.

If common ground is not reached, encourage

the person to submit a statement for the

record.

When the discussion reaches the point where

the supervisor has to say “That’s the way it

is,” how should this situation be handled?

 Acknowledge that you have heard and

understand the other person’s point. Validate

their reasons and their feelings.

 Say that you are willing to consider or

reconsider in time (if this is appropriate), but

for now, this is what you expect, want, need. If

you set a trial period, schedule a time to check

back with one another.

 Note that the employee has the right to

disagree, to put his/her perspective in writing

for the personnel file.

What if the employee refuses to sign the

evaluation form?

 See above ideas.

 In addition, if there has been adequate

discussion, and depending on the

circumstances, the supervisor can invite a

third party to serve as witness that the review

has been presented and discussed and that

the employee has refused to sign.

 Also, it is a good idea to add a disclaimer to

the evaluation form indicating that the

employee’s signature verifies that the review

was presented and discussed, but does not

necessarily indicate agreement with the

assessment of the supervisor.

What can an employee put into his/her file?

Whose file is it?

 It is the employer’s file.

 By law, the employee has the right to inspect

the contents of the personnel file, except for

information exempted by law, such as medical

records and confidential employment

references.

In what circumstances might the pastor, or the

next level manager get involved in an

Q & A

evaluation which has been delegated to the

business manager or some other appropriate

staff member?

 Upon request, after the supervisor and staff

member have really tried to work through

things.

 The pastor/manager needs to be clear on

his/her role in the process: listener, facilitator,

arbitrator, or neutral 3

party. He/she also

needs to be aware when role changes (if it

does).

 If one party approaches the pastor/manager

with a complaint about another, he/she should

assure that the person has talked with the

other person.

 His/her involvement will also be contingent on

how well he/she really knows the person’s

work.

What is the frequency and content of the

regular feedback to be provided to employees

in an on-going basis throughout the year?

 Remember performance management is a

process, not an event.

 Ask what employee finds helpful. Ask yourself

what you need, also. Then blend your needs

and the employee’s into a coherent plan.

Revise if circumstances warrant.

 Offer feedback when it happens; offer positive

as well as constructive feedback

 Remember that feedback is a two-way street—

employee needs to offer feedback to

supervisor as well.

 Minimally there should be 2 or 3 established

checkpoints annually.

What if discipline is needed?

 Ordinarily, discipline is not part of the

performance review process.

 Schedule a separate meeting.

 Create a plan for improvement.

 Allow enough time for the employee to

improve the objectionable behavior or meet

the performance standards.

 It is helpful to have a memo outline prepared

ahead of time. This serves as a guide to the

discussion. It can also be given to the staff

member for later reference.

SECTION II

TOOLS & FORMS FOR

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

PERFORMANCE PLAN

Plan Year

Staff Member Name

Position/Title

Background on preparing specific, measurable, concrete goals and objectives can be found in Section

II. (“Planning for Performance”)

A. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL (S)

• In the section below, state a professional development goal (or goals) that you expect to achieve

during the coming year. A development goal indicates something you plan to learn, or a skill you

hope to improve, that will help you fulfill the responsibilities of your position or the mission of the

parish more effectively. (Rating and assessments will be completed at the next annual review.)

Professional Development Goal (s) Rating(s):

Self-Assessment (to be completed at next annual review)

Supervisor Assessment (to be completed at next annual review)

B. PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES

• In the following sections write 3-8 specific, concrete, measurable performance objectives that you

plan to accomplish within the coming year. These should be related to key responsibilities from your

role description. Objectives may indicate a current level of performance that you wish to maintain,

give direction for improvement, or describe targets that you plan to accomplish. Please remember

to adjust this plan if responsibilities change significantly during the year. See section on

Performance Planning for additional help. (

Duplicate the following page as necessary.)

Performance Objective

Rating: (Complete at next annual review)

Self-Assessment (to be completed at next annual review)

Supervisor Assessment (to be completed at next annual review)

PERFORMANCE PLAN

Performance Objective

Rating: (Complete at next annual review)

Self-Assessment (to be completed at next annual review)

Supervisor Assessment (to be completed at next annual review)

Performance Objective

Rating: (Complete at next annual review)

Self-Assessment (to be completed at next annual review)

Supervisor Assessment (to be completed at next annual review)

Performance Objective

Rating: (Complete at next annual review)

Self-Assessment (to be completed at next annual review)

Supervisor Assessment (to be completed at next annual review)

 Please keep a copy of these pages. You will use them to assess the completion of the professional

development goal(s) and objectives in next year’s review.

MINISTRY REVIEW FEEDBACK SAMPLE

MINISTRY REVIEW FEEDBACK (Sp)

Following are sample questions that may be used by ministry leaders in soliciting feedback from

volunteers who assist in the ministry.

Additional methods of obtaining feedback include a

comprehensive evaluation of the ministry. Feedback may be solicited through surveys or focus groups

of participants in programs/services such as the youth group, Bible study group, marriage preparation,

religious education program etc.

Sample introduction

As part of my annual review of ministry, I am seeking feedback from persons served through the

ministry. By reflecting on this feedback I will have a greater sense of my strengths and of areas for

growth in ministry. Thank you for your willingness to give time and prayerful consideration to the

following questions. Please return this form to ( Insert name of person to whom form is to be

returned) by (Date) .

Signature of minister

Sample questions

 Describe how this ministry leader (staff member) has helped you in the performance of your

ministry this year. In what ways have you been affirmed? In what ways have you been

frustrated?

 How has this ministry leader encouraged you to explore your talents and to work creatively within

your chosen area of ministry?

 In what ways do you perceive that prayer is an important aspect of this person’s ministry? How

has he/she modeled styles of prayer for you and encouraged growth in your own prayer life?

 How has in-service that was offered by this ministry leader assisted you in your work in this

ministry?

a. What formation/education/growth opportunities were offered?

b. What activities did you take advantage of?

c. How did these opportunities meet your needs? the needs of those served by your

ministry?

 How has communication from this ministry leader helped to keep you informed? In what ways

might the communication been more effective?

 How does the person demonstrate professionalism and approachability in his/her ministerial

leadership?

 Do you find this ministry enjoyable and fulfilling? why or why not?

 What do you perceive to be the most important accomplishments of this ministry leader during

the past year?

Sp = Available in Spanish (Section III)

Based on questions developed by staffs of St. Edna and St. Francis Xavier (LaGrange) parishes.

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: PASTORAL ASSOCIATE

ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO

PASTORAL ASSOCIATE

PERFORMANCE REVIEW

(This form may be used both for self-assessment and supervisor-assessment.)

PASTORAL ASSOCIATE: ____________________________________________

PARISH NAME: ____________________________________________

FORM COMPLETED BY: ____________________________________________

DATE: _____________________________

PERFORMANCE RATINGS: (Select all appropriate ratings)

4. CONSISTENTLY EXCELLENT PERFORMANCE - EXPLANATION REQUIRED

3. ABOVE AVERAGE PERFORMANCE ON A CONSISTENT BASIS

2. PERFORMANCE MEETS THE BASIC JOB REQUIREMENTS

1. PERFORMANCE FAILS TO MEET JOB REQUIREMENTS - EXPLANATION

REQUIRED

(Note: If a category does not apply to the position under review, please leave it blank.)

PART ONE: PERFORMANCE AGAINST PREVIOUS YEAR'S OBJECTIVES

OBJECTIVE COMMENTS

1. 4 3 2 1

2. 4 3 2 1

3. 4 3 2 1

PART TWO: THREE OBJECTIVES FOR THE COMING YEAR

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: PASTORAL ASSOCIATE

PART THREE: LIST KEY JOB RESPONSIBILITIES AND EVALUATE PERFORMANCE

(Prioritize primary responsibilities from Job Analysis Worksheets)

KEY JOB RESPONSIBILITIES COMMENTS

4. 4 3 2 1

5. 4 3 2 1

6. 4 3 2 1

7. 4 3 2 1

8. 4 3 2 1

9. 4 3 2 1

COMMUNICATION SKILLS COMMENTS

10. Verbal Skills

4 3 2 1

11. Written Skills

4 3 2 1

12. Ability to communicate with peers

4 3 2 1

13. Ability to communicate with

supervisor

4 3 2 1

PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS COMMENTS

14. Works in collaboration to solve

problems

4 3 2 1

15. Uses sound judgement

4 3 2 1

16. Makes constructive recommendations

4 3 2 1

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: PASTORAL ASSOCIATE

KNOWLEDGE OF JOB COMMENTS

17. Exhibits needed skills

4 3 2 1

18. Performs duties within the required

standards

4 3 2 1

19. Continues education to update skills

4 3 2 1

20. Exhibits skills in leadership of others

4 3 2 1

21. Willingly learns new skills

4 3 2 1

GROUP WORK COMMENTS

22. Facilitates effective group meetings

4 3 2 1

23. Delegates authority effectively

4 3 2 1

24. Works with other ministerial groups

collaboratively

4 3 2 1

25. Contributes to a sense of community

4 3 2 1

RESPONSIBILITY COMMENTS

26. Volunteers to handle non-routine

tasks

4 3 2 1

27. Mediation skills

4 3 2 1

28. Locates and evaluates new resources

4 3 2 1

29. Works effectively within the parish

environment

4 3 2 1

30. Interpersonal skills

4 3 2 1

31. Initiates new parish programs

4 3 2 1

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: PASTORAL ASSOCIATE

Note work, committees and projects, which were performed on a regional, diocesan, or national

level by the pastoral associate:

PART FOUR: GENERAL COMMENTS

OVERALL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

A. TOTAL POINTS (FACTORS 1 – 31)

B. NUMBER OF CATEGORIES

C. AVERAGE RATING

(A DIVIDED BY B)

SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE:

POSITION:

SIGNATURE OF PASTORAL ASSOCIATE: * DATE:

*Signature does not necessarily indicate agreement with the supervisor’s comments and ratings, only that the

information in this document, including next year’s performance objectives, was discussed by the pastoral

associate and the supervisor.

SALARY GUIDELINES

Please refer to the Compensation Guidelines for information about how to determine salary increases.

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: DRE/CRE

ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO

DIRECTOR/COORDINATOR OF RELIGIOUS EDUCATION

PERFORMANCE REVIEW

(This form may be used both for self-assessment and supervisor assessment.)

CATECHETICAL LEADER:

PARISH NAME:

FORM COMPLETED BY:

DATE:

PERFORMANCE RATINGS: (Select all appropriate ratings.)

4. CONSISTENTLY EXCELLENT PERFORMANCE - EXPLANATION REQUIRED

3. ABOVE AVERAGE PERFORMANCE ON A CONSISTENT BASIS

2. PERFORMANCE MEETS THE BASIC JOB REQUIREMENTS

1. PERFORMANCE FAILS TO MEET THE JOB REQUIREMENTS - EXPLANATION

REQUIRED

(Note: If a category does not apply to the position under review, please leave it blank.)

PART ONE: JOB RELATED CRITERIA

COMMENTS

1. Recruits, trains, forms and supervises

catechetical staff

4 3 2 1

Plans, administers, assesses and evaluates the following programs. (Specify)

4 3 2 1

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: DRE/CRE

PART TWO: GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

ADMINISTRATION COMMENTS

5. Manages time effectively

6. Demonstrates effective organizational

skills

7. Initiates new programs when

appropriate

8. Exhibits effective communication skills

9. Demonstrates good leadership skills

10. Exhibits good evaluation skills

11. Coordinates new and existing

programs

12. Delegates authority effectively

13. Actively participates on the parish staff

14. Budgets resources effectively

COMMUNITY BUILDING COMMENTS

15. Mediates effectively

16. Listens effectively

17. Networks well with other professionals

18. Is accessible to parishioners

19. Demonstrates good interpersonal

skills

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: DRE/CRE

COMMUNITY BUILDING (Con’t.) COMMENTS

20. Works well within the parish

environment

21. Contributes to a sense of community

CATECHESIS COMMENTS

22. Displays effective training and

formation skills

23. Enhances personal development

24. Facilitates groups effectively

25. Locates and evaluates new

catechetical resources

26. Motivates and teaches others

effectively

PART THREE: PERFORMANCE OF PREVIOUS YEAR'S OBJECTIVES

27.

28.

29.

PART FOUR: OBJECTIVES FOR THE COMING YEAR

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: DRE/CRE

WHAT WORK, COMMITTEES, AND PROJECTS WERE PERFORMED ON A REGIONAL, DIOCESAN, OR

NATIONAL LEVEL BY THE DRE/CRE?

PART FIVE: GENERAL COMMENTS

OVERALL EVALUATION RATING (AVERAGE)

TOTAL POINTS (CRITERIA 1-29)

NUMBER OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

(POINTS DIVIDED BY # OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA)

SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE:

POSITION:

SIGNATURE OF CATECHETICAL LEADER*: DATE:

*Signature does not necessarily indicate agreement with the supervisor’s comments and ratings, only

that the information in this document, including next year’s performance objectives, was discussed by

the catechetical leader and the supervisor.

SALARY GUIDELINES

Please refer to the Compensation Guidelines for information about how to determine salary increases.

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: YOUTH MINISTRY DIRECTOR

ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO

DIRECTOR OF YOUTH MINISTRY

COORDINATOR OF YOUTH MINISTRY

PERFORMANCE REVIEW

(This form may be used both for self-assessment and supervisor assessment.)

YOUTH MINISTER:

PARISH NAME:

FORM COMPLETED BY:

DATE: _____________________________

PERFORMANCE RATINGS: (Select all appropriate ratings.)

4. CONSISTENTLY EXCELLENT PERFORMANCE -

EXPLANATION REQUIRED

3. ABOVE AVERAGE PERFORMANCE ON A CONSISTENT BASIS

2. PERFORMANCE MEETS THE BASIC JOB REQUIREMENTS

1. PERFORMANCE FAILS TO MEET THE JOB REQUIREMENTS -

EXPLANATION REQUIRED

(Note: If a category does not apply to the position under review, please leave it blank.)

PART ONE: JOB RELATED CRITERIA

WORD COMMENTS

1. Works with youth and adults to

provide formal and informal faith

sharing, catechesis and education

4 3 2 1

2. Plans, directs and supervises youth

retreats and the formation of the

retreat team

4 3 2 1

3. Supervises a youth drop-in center

and/or times for informal gathering of

youth and volunteers

4 3 2 1

4. Provides outreach and evangelization

to youth in the community

4 3 2 1

5. Present at social, school and

recreational events for youth

4 3 2 1

WORSHIP

6. Plans and implements specific youth

liturgical celebrations and events

4 3 2 1

7. Provides opportunities with parish

liturgy team for youth participation in

parish liturgical celebrations and

events

4 3 2 1

8. Encourages and assists in formation

of youth as worship leaders

4 3 2 1

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: YOUTH MINISTRY DIRECTOR

CREATING COMMUNITY COMMENTS

9. Organizes and conducts trips and

enrichment opportunities for youth

4 3 2 1

10. Supervises and provides youth sports

programs and recreational activities

4 3 2 1

11. Provides formal and informal

opportunities for teens to build

community

4 3 2 1

12. Manages fundraising programs to

instill ownership of youth ministry

4 3 2 1

GUIDANCE AND HEALING

13. Acts as a resource for youth and

families

4 3 2 1

14. Provides counseling & referrals for

youth, parents & families to

appropriate resources & programs

(e.g. crisis prevention, drug & alcohol

prevention, etc)

4 3 2 1

15. Plans and provides for formal and

informal ministry opportunities for

youth and their families

4 3 2 1

JUSTICE AND SERVICE

16. Provides peace and justice education

and/or opportunities for youth

4 3 2 1

17. Provides service opportunities for

youth

4 3 2 1

ENABLEMENT

18. Encourages youth participation in

deanery, vicariate, archdiocesan and

national events

4 3 2 1

19. Plans, administers and evaluates

youth leadership development

4 3 2 1

ADVOCACY

20. Interprets the needs and speaks for

youth on the parish and community

levels

4 3 2 1

21. Coordinates the production and

distribution of a teen newsletter

4 3 2 1

22. Provides outreach to early

adolescents

4 3 2 1

23. Networks with other Youth Ministers

(Deanery, Vicariate, Regional and

National levels)

4 3 2 1

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: YOUTH MINISTRY DIRECTOR

ADVOCACY, cont. COMMENTS

24. Maintains communication with local

high schools

4 3 2 1

25. Networks with Boy Scouts, Girl

Scouts, Campfire, Jr. Daughters of St.

Peter Claver & Explorer Programs

4 3 2 1

26. Networks with youth serving agencies

4 3 2 1

ADMINISTRATION

27. Assesses, plans, administers and

evaluates comprehensive 12-month

YM programs

4 3 2 1

28. Collaborates and communicates with

pastoral and support staff members

4 3 2 1

29. Recruits, trains, supervises and

nurtures adult and teen leaders

4 3 2 1

30. Provides for publicity of Parish Youth

Ministry goals programs and activities

4 3 2 1

ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES (Discretionary Points)

31.

4 3 2 1

32.

4 3 2 1

PART TWO: GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

33. Manages time effectively 4 3 2 1

34. Demonstrates good organization skills 4 3 2 1

35. Exhibits good communication skills 4 3 2 1

36. Demonstrates good leadership skills 4 3 2 1

37. Enhances personal spiritual and

professional development

4 3 2 1

38. Ability to delegate effectively 4 3 2 1

39. Relates effectively with other

ministerial associates

4 3 2 1

40. Is accessible to parishioners 4 3 2 1

41. Displays strong interpersonal skills

and is able to work with others

4 3 2 1

42. Ability to locate and evaluate new

resources

4 3 2 1

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: YOUTH MINISTRY DIRECTOR

PART THREE: PERFORMANCE OF PREVIOUS YEAR'S OBJECTIVES

43.

4 3 2 1

44.

4 3 2 1

45.

4 3 2 1

PART FOUR: OBJECTIVES FOR THE COMING YEAR

PART FIVE: GENERAL COMMENTS

Work, committees and projects which were performed by the youth minister on a cluster, deanery, vicariate,

regional, diocesan or national level

OTHER COMMENTS (Use additional page if necessary.)

OVERALL EVALUATION RATING (AVERAGE)

TOTAL POINTS (CRITERIA 1-45)

NUMBER OF APPLICABLE CATEGORIES

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

(POINTS DIVIDED BY # OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA)

SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER:

DATE:

POSITION:

SIGNATURE OF YOUTH MINISTER*: DATE:

*Signature does not necessarily indicate agreement with the supervisor’s comments and ratings, only that the

information in this document, including next year’s performance objectives, was discussed by the youth minister

and the supervisor.

SALARY GUIDELINES

Please refer to the Compensation Guidelines for information about how to determine salary increases.

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: MUSIC DIRECTOR

ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO

DIRECTOR OF MUSIC

PERFORMANCE REVIEW

(This form may be used both for self-assessment and supervisor assessment.)

MUSICIAN:

DATE:

PARISH:

LAST REVIEW:

EVALUATOR:

POSITION:

PERFORMANCE RATINGS:

4. EXCEEDS JOB EXPECTATIONS

3. MEETS JOB EXPECTATIONS

2. MINIMALLY MEETS JOB EXPECTATIONS - COMMENTS REQUIRED

1. FAILS TO MEET THE JOB EXPECTATIONS - COMMENTS REQUIRED

NOTE: ONLY COMPLETE CRITERIA THAT APPLY TO THE CURRENT JOB DESCRIPTION

EVALUATION CRITERIA 4 3 2 1 COMMENTS

1. Ensures appropriate music for all

parish liturgical services

2. Develops assembly repertoire and

weekly music selection

3. Contributes as an active member of

the parish staff

4. Contributes to the liturgical committee

5. Ensures appropriate music for school

services

6. Prepares and administers the music

budget

7. Selects parish music sources

8. Creates seasonal and/or weekly

worship aids

9. Supervises the parish musical

equipment

10. Provides parish liturgical education

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: MUSIC DIRECTOR

EVALUATION CRITERIA 4 3 2 1 COMMENTS

11. Recruits and hires professional

musicians for parish events and

services

12. Recruits and trains volunteer

musicians

13. Actively participates in parish and

community events

14. Active participant in professional

groups

Formation/training of liturgical music

groups

15. Direct supervision:

16.

17. Indirect supervision:

18.

19.

Individual skill levels as required:

20. Organ

21. Piano

22. Voice

23. Guitar

24. Other

25. Actively engages assembly

participation

26. Other criteria as determined by the

Director of Music and the Pastor:

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: MUSIC DIRECTOR

PERFORMANCE OF PREVIOUS YEAR'S OBJECTIVES

27.

4 3 2 1

28.

4 3 2 1

29.

4 3 2 1

OBJECTIVES FOR THE COMING YEAR:

OVERALL STRENGTHS OF THE MUSIC DIRECTOR’S PERFORMANCE:

AREAS IN WHICH THE MUSIC DIRECTOR CAN IMPROVE:

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: MUSIC DIRECTOR

GENERAL COMMENTS (SUPERVISOR):

DIRECTOR OF MUSIC’S COMMENTS REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:

OVERALL EVALUATION RATING (AVERAGE)

TOTAL POINTS

NUMBER OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA

OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING

(POINTS DIVIDED BY # OF APPLICABLE CRITERIA)

SIGNATURE OF REVIEWER: DATE:

POSITION:

SIGNATURE OF MUSIC DIRECTOR*: DATE:

*Signature does not necessarily indicate agreement with the supervisor’s comments and ratings, only that the

information in this document, including next year’s performance objectives, was discussed by the music director

and the supervisor.

SALARY GUIDELINES

Please refer to the Compensation Guidelines for information about how to determine salary increases.

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: DEACON

Deacon's Name

Parish or Agency

Review Period

(From) (To)

ANNUAL REVIEW

Deacon Personnel Board

Archdiocese of Chicago

816 Marengo Ave

Forest Park, IL 60130

(708) 336-8900

RETURN BY JUNE 30th

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: DEACON

Please circle the choice that best answers questions one through six

1. Have Ministerial Agreement commitments for All Most Some None*

Ministry of Charity and Justice been met?

2. Have Ministerial Agreement commitments All Most Some None*

for Liturgical Ministry been met?

3. Have Ministerial Agreement commitments All Most Some None*

for Ministry of the Word been met?

4. Have other Ministerial commitments as defined All Most Some None*

in the Ministry Agreement been met?

5. Have specific goals agreed upon in the All Most Some None*

Ministry Agreement been met?

* Please attach an explanation

6. Has the required annual retreat been made? Yes No

(If no, please give reason.)

7. In what way(s) has the Deacon been a positive influence to the parish or agency?

8. What type of development, if any, do you see as beneficial for the Deacon?

9. During the past year he has completed

hours of ministerial development.

We have discussed the above review on

(Date)

Deacon's Signature Pastor's/Director’s Signature

Supervisor's Signature

(If not the Pastor/Director)

SPECIFIC MINISTRY: DEACON

Archdiocese of Chicago

Office of the Permanent Diaconate

Permanent deacons are called to serve the church through service, word, and liturgy. It is important for

all ministers to step back periodically and reflect upon their commitment and to articulate their growth

and needs in ministry. This review should be a welcome opportunity to meet with your Pastor, agency

director, or supervisor to discuss the growth you have experienced, determine your effectiveness in

ministry, and identify areas for future growth.

The Cardinal has called once again for all ministers to be accountable. He has mandated periodic

review for all priests, deacons, and professional ministers. This is our community's response. Please

take it seriously and take the responsibility of initiating the process for your own continued growth.

Any review form is only a tool. This form has been designed to be simple. The key to a successful

review process is open communication between the deacon and the reviewer. This form is intended to

assist you in the review communication process rather then create a paper exercise. This form is not

the review and should not control the process. The best use of time in this process is in dialogue

between pastor/director/supervisor and deacon.

OBJECTIVES OF REVIEW

* Review performance of last year based on Ministry Agreement

* Develop a mutual understanding of ministry responsibilities and expectations between

pastor/director/supervisor and deacon

* Identify areas of accomplishment, achievement, and strengths

* Enhance and improve already acceptable performance of the deacon

* Identify ways to better utilize a deacon's abilities, skills, and strengths in service to the

community

* Identify areas requiring further development

* Open channels of communication between pastor/director/supervisor and the deacon

* Identify any areas of the Ministry Agreement that require changes

SUGGESTIONS TO ASSIST IN THE REVIEW PROCESS

* It is imperative to have the current Ministry Agreement available while completing the review

process.

* The review process should be conducted in a prayerful environment rather than a cold

impersonal environment.

* The review process is not meant to be judgmental, but to enhance personal and ministerial

growth.

* The review process should result in strengthening the overall ministry of the church, not just

improve the performance of the individual.

RETURN COMPLETED REVIEW BY JUNE 30 TO THE DIACONATE OFFICE

GENERAL MINISTRY REVIEW: OPTION A

PARISH MINISTRY REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE (Sp

)

MINISTER'S NAME DATE

MINISTRY TITLE/AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY

PARISH TIME IN SERVICE

PASTOR/SUPERVISOR POSITION

This ministry review form is designed for use by the ministerial leader and pastor/supervisor. Prior to

the review meeting, the self-assessment section of the form is completed by the minister. It is then

given to the pastor/supervisor, who adds his/her assessment for each area. During the review meeting

the minister and supervisor:

4 discuss their assessments of the previous year’s performance;

4 affirm the accomplishments of the year, identify and address problems, and determine

potential goals and areas for growth or improvement; and

4 plan for the coming year.

REVIEW OF PREVIOUS YEAR'S OBJECTIVES

OBJECTIVE SELF ASSESSMENT SUPERVISOR ASSESSMENT

Available in Spanish (Section III)

GENERAL MINISTRY REVIEW: OPTION A

SPECIFIC AREAS FOR REVIEW

OBJECTIVE SELF ASSESSMENT SUPERVISOR ASSESSMENT

Fosters the mission and priorities of

parish through this ministry.

Consults with appropriate parish staff,

other members of ministry team, and

representative parishioners regarding

decisions about this ministry.

Interacts in an effective manner with

pastoral team and parishioners to

provide coordination and ongoing

development.

Recruits and trains volunteers/others to

assist in ministry.

Continues to acquire & deepen essential

knowledge, competencies and skills.

Exercises responsible stewardship of

resources for ministry.

ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES (FROM ROLE DESCRIPTION)

OBJECTIVE SELF ASSESSMENT SUPERVISOR ASSESSMENT

GENERAL MINISTRY REVIEW: OPTION A

SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE REVIEW DISCUSSION

In this section summarize the key points of the performance review meeting including

accomplishments, potential objectives, areas for growth or development and ideas for addressing

problems which have surfaced during the discussion.

MINISTER'S COMMENTS REGARDING REVIEW

To be completed after the performance review meeting.

GENERAL MINISTRY REVIEW: OPTION A

NEXT YEAR'S OBJECTIVES (please prioritize)

In this section note at least 3 objectives for the coming year. (See Section I, Planning for Performance)

SIGNATURE OF MINISTER* DATE

SIGNATURE OF SUPERVISOR DATE

*Signature does not necessarily indicate agreement with the supervisor’s comments and ratings, only that the

information in this document, including next year’s performance objectives, was discussed by the minister and the

supervisor.

GENERAL MINISTRY REVIEW: OPTION B

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY (Sp)

Name of Minister

Title

Name of Reviewer

Date

A. Both the minister and the reviewer(s) answer the following questions in preparation for the

performance feedback meeting. A copy of the role description and yearly objectives/goals are

provided for each reviewer.

1. How has the minister fulfilled his or her responsibilities as described in the role

description and objectives? Note specific examples.

2. What have been the major accomplishments of the minister this past year?

3. How does the minister utilize planning skills: visioning for the future; long range

planning, organization and coordination for implementation?

4. How does the minister relate to other members of the staff and to parishioners? How

does she or he collaborate and communicate with others?

5. How has the person demonstrated:

accountability?

responsibility?

dependability?

flexibility?

6. How could this person enhance or improve his or her ability to minister?

7. What assistance/support/resources will be offered to aid this minister in fulfilling his/her

responsibilities?

8. Additional Reflections:

B. During the review meeting the minister and reviewer:

4 discuss their responses;

4 affirm the accomplishments of the year, identify and address problems, and

determine potential goals and areas for growth or improvement; and

4 plan for the coming year.

C. At the close of the meeting, they complete and sign a summary of the key points of the

discussion (accomplishments, areas for improvement, potential role modifications, areas for

development.) A copy of the next year’s objectives and a revised role description (when

finalized) should be attached to the summary.

Sp = Available in Spanish (Section III)

The pastor, supervisor or other designated person (s)

Reviewer Copy

GENERAL MINISTRY REVIEW: OPTION B

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY

Name of Minister

Title

Name of Reviewer

Date

A. Both the minister and the reviewer(s) answer the following questions in preparation for the

performance feedback meeting. A copy of the role description and yearly objectives/goals is

provided for each reviewer.

1. How have I fulfilled my responsibilities as described in my role description and

objectives? Note specific examples.

2. What have been my major accomplishments this past year?

3. How do I utilize planning skills: visioning for the future, long range planning, organization

and coordination for implementation?

4. How do I relate to other members of the staff and to parishioners? How do I collaborate

and communicate with others?

5. How have I demonstrated:

accountability?

responsibility?

dependability?

flexibility?

6. How could I enhance or improve my ability to minister?

7. What assistance/support/resources would help me minister better?

8. Other reflections:

B. During the review meeting the minister and reviewer:

4 discuss their responses;

4 affirm the accomplishments of the year, identify and address problems, and

determine potential goals and areas for growth or improvement; and

4 plan for the coming year.

C. At the close of the meeting, they complete and sign a summary of the key points of the

discussion (accomplishments, areas for improvement, potential role modifications, areas for

development.) A copy of the next year’s objectives and a revised role description (when

finalized) should be attached to the summary.

The pastor, supervisor or other designated person (s)

Minister Co

GENERAL MINISTRY REVIEW: OPTION B

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY

Name of Minister

Title

Name of Reviewer

Date

The key conclusions of the review discussion are documented in the space below. A copy of the next

year’s objectives (and a revised role description) are attached. The minister receives a copy for his/her

personal file and a copy is maintained in the local personnel file.

(See Section I, “Planning for Performance”

for information on preparing objectives.)

Minister signature*

Date

Reviewer signature(s)

Date

*Signature does not necessarily indicate agreement with the supervisor’s comments and ratings, only that the

information in this document, including next year’s performance objectives, was discussed by the minister and the

supervisor.

Summary

SUPPORT STAFF

Date of Review ___________________

ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO

PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Support Staff (Sp)

/ /

Employee Name Hire Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Job Title

Time in Position /

Parish Supervisor Year/Months

The employee completes a self-assessment for each item in sections I, II, and III. The supervisor reviews the self-

assessment, completes his/her assessment (and determines a numerical rating

). During the review meeting the

supervisor and support staff member: discuss their assessments of the previous year’s performance; affirm the

accomplishments of the year, identify and address problems, and determine potential goals and areas for growth

or improvement; and plan for the coming year.

I. ASSESSMENT OF KEY COMPETENCIES AND SKILLS

SKILL/ COMPETENCY SELF ASSESSMENT EVALUATOR ASSESSMENT RATING

Job Knowledge: Has general and

technical knowledge to perform

responsibilities of position. Learns

new skills for improved effectiveness

in position.

Work Quality: Performs duties within

required expectations. Takes

initiative. Is self-motivated.

Completely and thoroughly carries

out assignments and instructions.

Demonstrates flexibility by assisting

other support staff when

appropriate.

Communication: Keeps supervisor

and co-workers appropriately

informed of work progress and work

related issues. Understands and

carries out verbal and written

instructions to satisfactorily complete

day to day responsibilities. Requests

clarification when necessary.

Conveys messages accurately,

demonstrates verbal and written

skills as appropriate for the position.

Sp = Available in Spanish (Section III)

Use of numerical ratings is optional. If used, criteria and system for determining the rating should be clear and

objective. The following ratings may be used: 5) Consistently exceeds expectations; 4) Consistently meets and

sometimes exceeds expectations; 3) Consistently meets expectations; 2) Needs improvements; 1) Consistently

fails to meet expectations.

SUPPORT STAFF

SKILL/ COMPETENCY SELF ASSESSMENT EVALUATOR ASSESSMENT RATING

Human Relations: Exercises

courtesy and professionalism in

dealing with others. Demonstrates

respect for others regardless of their

ethnic background, race, gender or

disabilities. Works with others to

secure cooperation and promote

teamwork. Shows an appropriate

level of hospitality and sensitivity for

role within the Church.

Dependability: Completes assigned

tasks with little or no supervision.

Can be relied upon to be present

and on time. Puts forth extra effort

when needed.

II. REVIEW OF KEY RESPONSIBILITIES

In each section below the employee indicates a key responsibility, and completes a self-assessment of

the fulfillment of the responsibility using the performance indicators determined at the beginning of the

year. The supervisor reviews the self-assessment, completes his/her assessment, and determines a

numerical rating (optional).

a. Responsibility:

d. Rating:

b. Self Assessment:

c. Supervisor Assessment:

a. Responsibility:

d. Rating:

b. Self Assessment:

c. Supervisor Assessment:

SUPPORT STAFF

(This page may be duplicated as necessary.)

a. Responsibility:

d. Rating:

b. Self Assessment:

c. Supervisor Assessment:

a. Responsibility:

d. Rating:

b. Self Assessment:

c. Supervisor Assessment:

a. Responsibility:

d. Rating:

b. Self Assessment:

c. Supervisor Assessment:

SUPPORT STAFF

III. REVIEW OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL

In the section below the employee states the professional development goal, which was to be

completed during the past year and completes a self-assessment of the fulfillment of the goal. The

supervisor reviews the self-assessment, completes his/her assessment, and determines a rating.

a. Professional Development Goal:

d. Rating:

b. Self Assessment:

c. Supervisor Assessment:

IV. OVERALL RATING

Indicate:

a. the overall average numerical rating (sum of ratings divided by number of

factors rated) and/or

b. the descriptive rating (e.g. Meets expectations, etc.) for this employee’s

performance

a. b.

Supervisor Comments:

Employee Comments

(to be completed after the review meeting):

Employee* signature Date

Supervisor signature Date

*Signature does not necessarily indicate agreement with the supervisor’s comments and ratings, only that the

information in this document, including next year’s performance objectives, was discussed by the employee and

the supervisor.

INTER-STAFF FEEDBACK FORM: OPTION A

Inter-Staff Feedback Reflection Form A (Short)

Name of Feedback Recipient

Name of Feedback Provider

(Prior to using this reflection page, the staff should have agreed upon the criteria or behaviors about

which they will provide feedback to one another. They should also have agreed on how they will offer

the feedback to one another. Staff members can use this worksheet to note their feedback regarding

one another. Each staff member should also assess him/herself.)

Qualities, criteria, behaviors for feedback:

1. Indicate the feedback recipient's strengths in the areas listed above. Note specific examples when

these strengths were demonstrated.

2. Indicate areas or opportunities for growth or improvement for this feedback recipient. Again,

indicate specific examples of how the person might improve.

INTER-STAFF FEEDBACK FORM: OPTION B

Inter-Staff Feedback Reflection Form B

 This form is designed as a model for staff members to reflect on specific ministry/work criteria for

themselves and for other staff members prior to offering feedback to one another in a group setting.

It is preferable that staff discuss and modify the criteria for their particular situation, and that they

discuss the method by which they will offer feedback to one another.

 Ratings: N= Not applicable/don’t know; Scale of 7-1 with 7 as the highest (outstanding) and 1 as

the lowest.

Name of Feedback Recipient

Name of Feedback Provider (optional)

Communication

N 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Presents ideas effectively in formal and informal situations. Conveys thoughts clearly and concisely.

Listens well and asks appropriate questions. Communicates well in writing. Reviews letters, memos

and reports to assure accuracy. Keeps other staff members and co-workers informed.

Comments:

Interpersonal Skills

N 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Expresses emotions appropriately. Initiates friendly interactions. Provides positive and negative

feedback appropriately. Interacts effectively with pastor, other staff members, leadership groups,

ministers, and parishioners. Collaborates well. Accepts positive and negative feedback. Faces and

resolves conflict.

Comments:

Problem Solving and Decision Making

N 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Recognizes problems and opportunities. Uses resources in solving problems. Solves problems

systematically. Fully resolves problems. Makes good decisions. Develops new solutions.

Comments:

Priority Setting

N 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Sets appropriate priorities. Uses time effectively. Plans and organizes work. Oversees and follows up to

assure work completion.

Comments:

INTER-STAFF FEEDBACK FORM: OPTION B

Job Knowledge

N 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Understands the responsibilities of his/her position. Has academic, technical and/or general knowledge

to perform responsibilities of position. Demonstrates overall knowledge of parish priorities. Seeks

professional development and shows evidence of professional growth.

Comments:

Personal Qualities

N 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Is able to work independently. Shows appropriate assertiveness/initiative. Is able to make mistakes and

learn from them. Maintains poise under the normal pressures and strains of the position. Tends to be

patient, adaptable and flexible. Has an active spiritual life.

Comments:

Mission

N 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Promotes the mission and priorities of the parish and Archdiocese. Places a high priority on service to

the people of the parish. Knows and respects Church teaching. Understands other parish ministries

and work as they relate to his/her ministry/work.

Comments:

Ministry

N 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Sees that persons sharing in his/her ministry develop an understanding and practical ability in that

area. Knows and communicates the current status of the ministerial work for which he/she is

responsible; maintains accurate records. Effectively recruits and guides parishioners into the ministry

for which he/she is responsible.

Comments:

Areas of Strength

: Suggestions for Growth:

POSITION DESCRIPTIONS

The position description is an important tool for communicating and clarifying the specific tasks and

functions that define an employee’s job. It is also useful for establishing performance objectives and

standards. The following are the key elements that should be included in all job descriptions for

employees at your parish:

JOB TITLE

The job title should be appropriate for the duties of the position, and should not presently be in use to

describe any other position with different responsibilities at your parish.

REPORTS TO

To avoid the confusion that sometimes results from informal reporting relationships, it is important that

you identify, by job title, the person to whom the employee officially reports. This should be the

individual who will conduct the employee’s performance review.

DIRECT SUBORDINATES

In order to accurately describe the scope of responsibility associated with an employee’s position, it is

important that you identify, by job title, any positions that report directly to the employee. Direct

subordinates will include only those positions for which the employee has authority to hire, fire, initiate

disciplinary action, review performance and make salary recommendations. If final authority for these

decisions rests with the pastor, the employee must at least have significant input in such decisions in

order to be considered to have responsibility for direct subordinates.

BASIC FUNCTION

In preparing this part of the position description, the basic function of the position should be described

briefly and in general terms. Generally, a two or three sentence summary of the primary duties and

responsibilities will be sufficient.

DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

In this section, it is important to list the duties and activities for which the employee in this position will

be held accountable. This list must be as specific and complete as possible, including the frequency

with which duties are to be performed, where appropriate. However, avoid getting hung up on detail. If

the employee is responsible for preparing a particular report, for example, it may not be necessary to

itemize the five or six steps required to prepare the report. Also, do not list duties that are not truly a

function of this position, but may traditionally be handled by a particular person (e.g. the business

manager who likes to water the plants.)

EEOC JOB CLASSIFICATION

This is a code used by the federal government in various reports, you may be asked at some point to

complete. It describes the nature of the work required of the employee in a particular position. At your

parish, you are likely to deal with four such classifications: OM-Officials and Managers, PR-

Professional, OC-Office Clerical and SW-Service Workers. Officials and Managers

are those who

supervise the work of two or more employees, hire, fire, initiate disciplinary action, review performance

and make salary recommendations for subordinate employees. Pastors, principals and business

managers fall into this category. Please note that working supervisors who spend a majority of their

time performing the same duties as the individuals they supervise are not truly supervisors, and are not

classified as officials and managers. Professionals

are those who are engaged in an occupation that

generally requires a college degree in a specific field. Teachers, Directors of Religious Education,

Pastoral Associates, Music Ministers and the various other professional lay ministry positions fall into

this category.

POSITION DESCRIPTIONS

Office Clerical employees are those employed in support staff functions in an office environment.

Secretaries, bookkeepers, library workers and receptionists fall into this category. Service Workers

are

employees who provide non-administrative support staff services. Janitors, custodians, maintenance

workers, maintenance supervisors who spend a majority of their time performing the same duties as the

other maintenance employees, cooks and housekeepers fall into this category.

EXEMPT/NON-EXEMPT STATUS

Exempt employees are generally called salaried employees because they are not paid by the hour, and

are not eligible for overtime pay. The federal government has defined the types of employees who may

legitimately be classified as exempt or salaried employees. At our parishes, exempt employees are

those who fall into the categories of Officials and Managers

and Professionals as described above.

All employees who fall into the categories of Office Clerical

or Service Workers are non-exempt

employees. They are required to report all hours worked each week on a time card or time sheet, and

they must be paid time and a half for any hours actually worked in excess of forty in the same work

week.

ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS

These are functions that are so essential to the position that if an individual cannot perform them, even

with a reasonable accommodation to assist someone with a disability, that individual cannot be

employed in the position. Duties and functions that are relatively unimportant to the primary functions of

a position, or those that could be easily assigned to another employee, should not be indicated as

essential functions. The Americans with Disabilities Act requires all employers to identify the essential

functions of all their positions.

The following is a sample position description that incorporates all of the key elements listed above.

POSITION DESCRIPTIONS

Archdiocese of Chicago 4/95

Position Description OC/NEX

Title: Secretary

Reports to: Director, Human Resources

Direct Subordinates: None

Basic Functions

Answers phones, schedules appointments, types, copies and files various correspondence and reports,

and provides general secretarial and office services to the Director.

Duties and Responsibilities

1.* Answers phones and screens calls for the Director

2.* Responds to phone requests from the parishes and agencies by providing general information

regarding benefits and other Human Resource procedures.

3.* Types correspondence and various reports using a standard electric typewriter and word

processing software on a personal computer. Sends rejection letters to unsuccessful

candidates.

4. Uses PC graphic software to prepare special notices and job postings.

5.* Maintains Director’s files in an orderly fashion; purges files and sends them to Archives

annually.

6. Prepares special mailings and other projects as needed.

7.* Greets visitors, and announces them to the appropriate member of the Human Resources staff.

8.* Schedules meetings and appointments for the Director; maintains the Director’s calendar.

9.* Arranges for the use of conference rooms and ensures that all necessary equipment,

refreshments, etc. are available for meetings.

10. Drafts own correspondence in response to general requests from parishes and agencies. May

draft correspondence for the Director.

11. Makes travel and lodging arrangements for the Director and Associate Director, as necessary in

connection with conferences and business travel.

12. May provide assistance to other members of Human Resources staff, as needed.

13.* Opens and sorts mail for the Director.

14.* Processes invoices and check requests for the agency.

15. May review resumes and conduct preliminary phone screening of applicants.

16. May take minutes at meetings.

17.* Coordinates temporary help for the Pastoral Center and near-by off-campus locations.

18.* Maintains supply inventory for the agency.

19.* Provides secretarial support to the Associate Director, as needed.

20.* May be given various other assignments and projects consistent with the responsibility level

and general duties as a secretary.

* Denotes essential functions of this position, in conjunction with the Americans with

Disabilities Act.

SECTION III

MATERIALS IN SPANISH

GUIA PARA LA REVISíON

GUÍA PARA LA REVISIÓN DE RENDIMIENTO DE TRABAJO

EMPLEADOS DEL MINISTERIO PARROQUIAL (EMP)

El Empleado del Ministerio Parroquial

Hará su propia evaluación

1. Se basará en las metas de la misión de la parroquia

2. Seguirá la descripción y objetivos de su trabajo

3. Usará ejemplos concretos

4. Incorporará el “feedback” de las personas servidas en su ministerio

5. Antes de la reunión de revisión dará al supervisor una copia de su auto evaluación

El Supervisor

Hará la evaluación del emp

1. Se basará en las metas de la misión de la parroquia

2. Seguirá la descripción y objetivos del trabajo del emp

3. Revisará los ejemplos concretos dados por el emp

4. Revisará el “feedback” del ministerio del emp

5. Revisará la auto-evaluación del emp

6. Antes de la reunión de revisión dará al emp una copia de su evaluación

El Supervisor y el EMP

1. Fijarán la fecha para la reunión de revisión

2. Escogerán un lugar apropiado para reunirse donde las interrupciones sean mínimas

3. Cada uno preparará un bosquejo de metas a seguir para el año entrante facilitando así

entendimiento mutuo y mejor planeación

El Supervisor tendrá en cuenta:

♦ No basar su juicio en primeras impresiones ya sean favorables o desfavorables.

♦ Evitar hacer generalizaciones al hacer la evaluación

♦ Evitar el juzgar más favorablemente a aquellos que tienen alguna semejanza con usted

♦ Evitar evaluar siempre al EMP en el punto medio de rendimiento

♦ Evitar las dos tendencias: demasiada rigidez o demasiada condescendencia

GUIA PARA LA REVISíON

La discusión del rendimiento de trabajo

Después de que el EMP y el supervisor han recibido y estudiado las respectivas evaluaciones, se

reunirán de acuerdo con la fecha acordada para la discusión del rendimiento.

Durante la reunión el supervisor deberá proporcionar un ambiente de confianza que facilite el diálogo.

Deberá también usar el “feedback” en lugar de crítica negativa.

El proceso a seguir será:

1. El EMP presenta su evaluación y aclara sus puntos

2. El supervisor presenta su evaluación, escucha y ofrece “feedback” basado en sus observaciones

3. Discuten y analizan la realidad del rendimiento obtenido ante la meta fijada

4. Resuelven problemas concretos con miras a las metas del próximo año

5. Elaboran un plan de acción práctico y alcanzable

6. Repasan de nuevo todos los puntos de la evaluación

7. Si queda algún punto sin resolver fijarán una fecha para hacerlo

8. El “feedback” del rendimiento se usará consistentemente durante el año como un apoyo de

motivación

“FEEDBACK”

REVISIÓN DEL MINISTERIO “FEEDBACK”

Aquí se encuentran una serie de preguntas que podrán ser usadas por los ministros líderes cuando

pidan una información “feedback” a voluntarios que ayudan en el ministerio.

Otros métodos para

obtener “feedback” comprenden una evaluación completa del ministerio como Harvesting Hope, para

catequesis en las parroquias; encuestas o grupos de enfoque de participantes en un

programa/servicio, tales como miembros del grupo de juventud, el grupo de estudio de Biblia, parejas

en un programa de preparación para matrimonios, padres de niños en un programa de educación

religiosa, etc.

Ejemplo de introducción

Como parte de mi revisión anual, busco “feedback” de personas que han recibido servicio con mi

ministerio. Refleccionando en esta información tendré una visión más completa de mis capacidades y

de las áreas en las cuales debo crecer en el ministerio. Les agradezco mucho su tiempo y una

reflección en oración a las siguientes preguntas.

Por favor tengan la bondad de devolver esta forma completa a (Escriba el nombre y dirección de la

persona a la que se deberá enviar este informe.) (Escriba la fecha para la que deberán entregar el

informe.)

________________________________

Firma del ministro

Ejemplos de preguntas

 Explique cómo este ministro líder, le ha ayudado a ejercer su ministerio durante el año.

¿De qué manera le ha apoyado?

¿Cómo se ha sentido frustrado?

 ¿Cómo le ha ayudado este ministro líder a desarrollar sus talentos y a trabajar creativamente

dentro del área de su ministerio?

 ¿Cómo considera que la oración es un aspecto importante en el ministerio de esta persona? ¿De

qué manera le ha sugerido diferentes modos de oración y cómo le ha animado a crecer en su

propia vida de oración?

Tomado de preguntas creadas por los grupos de las parroquias St Edna y St Francis Xavier (La Grange)

“FEEDBACK”

 ¿De qué forma el entrenamiento ofrecido por el ministro líder, le ha apoyado en su trabajo

ministerial?

a. ¿Qué oportunidades se han ofrecido de formación/ educación/ entrenamiento?

b. ¿Cuáles de estas oportunidades ha podido usar?

c. ¿Cuáles de estas oportunidades han sido apropiadas para sus necesidades? ¿Para las

necesidades de las personas a quienes usted sirve en su ministerio?

 ¿Cómo le ha ayudado la comunicación con el ministro líder para mantenerse informado?

 ¿Cómo ha podido ser más efectiva esta comunicación?

 ¿Cómo ha demostrado el ministro líder profesionalismo y ha facilitado el acudir a el/ella en su

liderazgo ministerial?

 ¿Encuentra este ministerio agradable y satisfactorio? (SI - NO) Explíque.

 ¿Cuáles cree que han sido los logros más importantes de este ministro líder durante este año

pasado?

MINISTERIO EN GENERAL: OPCÍON A

REVISIÓN DEL RENDIMIENTO DEL MINISTERIO PARROQUIAL

NOMBRE DEL EMPLEADO DEL MINISTERIO FECHA

TITULO DEL EMPLEADO DEL MINISTERIO-AREA DE RESPONSABILIDAD

PARROQUIA TIEMPO EN ESTE SERVICIO

NOMBRE DEL PÁRROCO-SUPERVISOR POSICIÓN

Esta forma es para el uso del ministro parroquial y del párroco o del supervisor. Antes de la reunión de revisión

el ministro debe haber terminado su propia evaluación y la presentará al párroco o al supervisor, el cual añadirá

su evaluación para cada área. (Tanto el párroco/supervisor como el ministro tienen la opción de usar las Guías

para la revisión de empleados del ministerio parroquial.)

Durante la reunión de revisión el ministro y el supervisor:

 Discutirán sus evaluaciones sobre el rendimiento del año anterior

 Verificarán los logros obtenidos durante el año, identificarán y aclararán problemas y determinarán

las metas potenciales, las áreas de crecimiento y de mejora y;

 Elaborarán el plan para el próximo año

REVISIÓN DE LOS OBJETIVOS DEL AÑO ANTERIOR

OBJETIVO

AUTO-EVALUACIÓN

EVALUACIÓN DEL SUPERVISOR

MINISTERIO EN GENERAL: OPCIÓN A

ÁREAS CONCRETAS PARA LA REVISIÓN

RESPONSABILIDAD

AUTO-EVALUACIÓN

EVALUACIÓN DEL SUPERVISOR

Fomenta la misión y las prioridades

de la parroquia en su ministerio

Consulta con el debido personal de

la paroquia con otros miembors del

equipo ministerial y con

representantes de los parroquianos

sobre decisiones que afectan al

ministerio.

Se comunica apropiadamente con

los miembros del equipo parroquial

y con los parroquianos con el fin

de facilitar coordinación y

continuación en el ministerio.

Recluta y entrena voluntarios y

otras personas para que ayuden en

el ministerio.

Continúa adquiriendo y

profundizando sus conocimentos

básicos, competencias y

capacidades.

Administra responsablemente los

recursos del ministerio.

OTRAS RESPONSABILIDADES TOMADAS DE LA DESCRIPCIÓN DEL TRABAJO

RESPONSABILIDAD AUTO-EVALUACIÓN EVALUACIÓN DEL SUPERVISOR

MINISTERIO EN GENERAL: OPCIÓN A

RESUMEN DE LA DISCUSIÓN SOBRE EL RENDIMIENTO

En esta sección el supervisor hace un resumen de los puntos claves tratados en la reunión de

evaluación incluyendo logros obtenidos, objetivos potenciales, áreas de crecimeinto o de mejora, así

como ideas enfocando problemas que hayan surgido durante la discusión.

COMENTARIOS DEL MINISTRO PARROQUIAL SOBRE EL RESUMEN DEL RENDIMIENTO

Deberán escribirse después de la reunión

OBJETIVOS PARA EL PROXIMO AÑO POR ORDEN DE PRIORIDAD

En esta sección se escribirán los objetivos para el próximo año.

Firma del empleado del ministerio Fecha

________________________________________________________________________

Firma del supervisor Fecha

MINISTERIO EN GENERAL: OPCIÓN B

REVISIÓN ANUAL DEL MINISTERIO

Copia para el revisor

Nombre del ministro

Título

Nombre del revisor

Fecha

A. Tanto el ministro como el revisor(s) contestan las siguientes preguntas como preparación para la

reunión de revisión. A cada revisor se le dará con una copia con la descripción del trabajo y de los

objetivos/metas del año.

B. Durante la reunión de revisión el ministro y el revisor:

♦ discutirán sus respuestas

♦ confirmarán los logros obtenidos durante el año, identificarán y tratarán problemas

concretos, determinarán metas potenciales y áreas de crecimiento o de mejora; y

♦ establecerán un plan concreto para el año próximo

C. Al cerrarse la reunión completarán y firmarán un resumen de los puntos principales tratados

durante la discusión (logros obtenidos, áreas por mejorar, posibles modificaciones en el trabajo,

áreas por desarrollar.) Una copia de los objetivos para el año próximo y la descripción del trabajo

(cuando esté terminada) deberán adjuntarse con el resumen.

El ministro.

1. ¿Cómo ha cumplido las responsabilidades y los objetivos detallados en la descripción del

trabajo? Anote ejemplos concretos.

2. ¿Cuáles han sido sus logros más importantes durante este año?

El párroco, supervisor, u otras personas designadas

MINISTERIO EN GENERAL: OPCIÓN B

Sistema de planeación:

3. ¿Cómo ha utilizado los planeamientos?: visión del futuro; planeamiento a largo plazo,

organización y coordinación para implementar los planes.

4. ¿Cómo se ha relacionado con otros empleados en el trabajo y con los parroquianos?

¿Cómo se ha comunicado y colaborado con los demás?

5. ¿Cómo ha demostrado su:

capacidad de rendir cuentas de su trabajo

responsabilidad

dependencia (se puede contar con el/ella)

flexibilidad?

6. ¿Cómo puede aumentar o mejorar su servicio ministerial?

7. ¿Qué ayuda/apoyo/recursos se le pueden ofrecer para mejor llenar sus responsabilidades?

8. Otras reflecciones:

MINISTERIO EN GENERAL: OPCIÓN B

REVISIÓN ANUAL DEL MINISTERIO

Copia para el ministro

Nombre del ministro

Título

Nombre del revisor

Fecha

A. Tanto el ministro como el revisor(es) contestan las siguientes preguntas como preparación para la

reunión de revisión. A cada revisor se le dará con una copia con la descripción del trabajo y de los

objetivos/metas del año.

B. Durante la reunión de revisión el ministro y el revisor:

♦ discutirán sus respuestas

♦ confirmarán los logros obtenidos durante el año, identificarán y tratarán problemas

concretos, determinarán metas potenciales y áreas de crecimiento o de mejora; y

♦ establecerán un plan concreto para el año próximo

C. Al cerrarse la reunión completarán y firmarán un resumen de los puntos principales tratados

durante la discusión (logros obtenidos, áreas por mejorar, posibles modificaciones en el trabajo,

áreas por desarrollar.) Una copia de los objetivos para el año próximo y la descripción del trabajo

(cuando esté terminada) deberán adjuntarse con el resumen.

El ministro (Reflección propia)

1. ¿Cómo he cumplido mis responsabilidades y los objetivos detallados en la descripción del

trabajo? (Ejemplos concretos)

2. ¿Cuáles han sido mis logros más importantes durante este año?

MINISTERIO EN GENERAL: OPCIÓN B

Mi sistema de planeación:

3. ¿Cómo he utilizado los planeamientos?: visión del futuro; planeamiento a largo plazo,

organización y coordinación para implementar los planes.

4. ¿Cómo me he relacionado con otros empleados en el trabajo y con los parroquianos?

¿Cómo me he comunicado y colaborado con los demás?

5. ¿Cómo he demostrado mi:

capacidad de rendir cuentas de mi trabajo

responsabilidad

dependencia (se puede contar conmigo)

flexibilidad?

6. ¿Cómo puedo aumentar o mejorar mi servicio ministerial?

7. ¿Qué ayuda/apoyo/recursos me pueden ofrecer para mejor llenar mis responsabilidades?

9. Otras reflecciones:

MINISTERIO EN GENERAL: OPCIÓN B

REVISIÓN ANUAL DEL MINISTERIO

Nombre del ministro

Parroquia

Nombre del revisor

Fecha

La clave de las conclusiones de la revisión están documentadas en el espacio de esta página. Una

copia de los objetivos del año próximo (y una descripción revisada del trabajo) vienen aquí también. El

ministro recibe una copia para su archivo personal y otra copia se guarda en el archivo.

Firma del ministro

Fecha

Firma del revisor(es)

Fecha

PERSONAL DE ASISTENCIA

ARQUIDIÓCESIS DE CHICAGO

REVISIÓN DEL RENDIMIENTO

Personal de asistencia

Fecha de la revisión___________________

Nombre del empleado Fecha de empleo(mes/día/año) Trabaja como

Tiempo en esta posición_______/_____

Parroquia Nombre del supervisor Años/meses

El empleado completa su propia evaluación sobre cada uno de los puntos de la sección I, II y III. El

supervisor revisa la evaluación y la completa (dando una evaluación numérica.

) Durante la reunión el

supervisor y el empleado de asistencia discuten sus revisiones del año pasado; confirman los logros

del año, identifican problemas, determinan posibles metas, áreas de crecimiento o de mejoras; y

hacen el plan para el año próximo.

I. EVALUACION DE COMPETENCIAS Y CAPACIDADES CLAVES

COMPETENCIAS/ CAPACIDADES

AUTO-EVALUACIÓN (EMPLEADO)

EVLUACIÓN DEL SUPERVISOR

EVALUACIÓN

Conocimiento del trabajo:

Conocimiento general y técnico

para desempeñar

responsablemente las

obligaciones de su cargo.

Aprende nuevos métodos para

mejorar y ser más efectivo en su

posición.

Calidad del trabajo: Realiza los

deberes dentro de lo que se

espera. Toma iniciativas. Está

auto- otivado. Completa

perfectamente las órdenes y

sigue las instrucciones. Es

flexible ayudando a otro

personal asistente cuando es

apropiado.

Comunicación: Mantiene al

supervisor y compañeros de

trabajo adecuadamente

informados del progreso del

trabajo y de lo relacionando con

el mismo. Entiende y ejecuta

instrucciones verbales y escritas

para cumplir satisfactoriamente

sus responsabilidades diarias.

Pide aclaración cuando es

necesario. Da los mensajes con

exactitud. Demuestra capacidad

oral y escrita para desempeñar

apropiadamente su posición.

El personal de asistencia de la escuela puede usar las formas OCE.

El uso de la evaluación numérica es opcional. Si se emplea, debe ser por medio de una escala clara y objetiva. Los siguientes

números pueden usarse. 5) Siempre más de lo esperado. 4) Llega a lo que se esperaba, a veces más de lo esperado. 3) Llega a lo

que se esperaba. 2) Necesita mejorar. 1) Falla constantemente, no llega a lo esperado.

PERSONAL DE ASISTENCIA

Relaciones humanas: Es cortés

y profesional en el trato con los

demás. Demuestra respeto por

otros sin tener en cuenta su

grupo étnico, su pasado, raza,

sexo o incapacidad corporal.

Trabaja con otros para asegurar

cooperación y promover trabajo

de equipo. Muestra un nivel

adecuado de hospitalidad y

sensibilidad para trabajar dentro

de la Iglesia.

Dependencia: Completa los

trabajos ordenados con poca o

ninguna supervisión. Se puede

confiar en su asistencia y

puntualidad. Cuando urge algún

trabajo, pone más interés y

esfuerzo.

II. REVISIÓN DE LAS RESPONSIBILIDADES CLAVES

En cada una de las secciones siguientes el empleado indica una responsabilidad principal y completa su propia

evaluación usando la escala de competencia determinada al principio del año. El supervisor repasa la

evaluación hecha por el empleado y determina una escala de evaluacion. (opcional)

a. Responsabilidad

b. Comentarios del empleado

c. Comentarios del supervisor

d . Evaluación

PERSONAL DE ASISTENCIA

(Esta página se puede duplicar si es necesario.)

a. Responsabilidad

b. Comentarios del empleado

c. Comentarios del supervisor

d . Evaluación

a. Responsabilidad

b. Comentarios del empleado

c. Comentarios del supervisor

d . Evaluación

a. Responsabilidad

b. Comentarios del empleado

c. Comentarios del supervisor

d . Evaluación

PERSONAL DE ASISTENCIA

III. REVISIÓN DE LA META PROGRAMADA PARA EL AÑO

En la sección de abajo el empleado escribe la meta que ha sido completada durante el año pasado y

completa su propio comentario. El supervisor revisa los comentarios del empleado, completa

escribiendo sus propios comentarios y determina una escala de evaluación.

a. Meta

b. Comentarios del empleado

c. Comentarios del supervisor

d . Evaluación

IV. EVALUACIÓN GENERAL

Escriba (a) el promedio numérico general de las escalas de evaluación (sume

las escalas y divídalas por el número de evaluaciones) y (b) la escala

descriptiva (e.g. Llena las expectaciones, etc) del desempeño del empleado.

Comentarios del supervisor:

Comentarios del empleado: (han de ser hechos después de la reunión de revisión)

Empleado Fecha

Supervisor Fecha

PLAN DE RENDIMENTO

PLAN DE RENDIMIENTO

(Esta página se puede duplicar si es necesario.)

AÑO:_____________

Nombre Posición que desempeña

En la sección de abajo indique de 3 a 6 responsabilidades y de 1 a 2 metas de rendimiento sobre las que va a

enfocar durante el año que entra. (Puede usar otra página si es necesario.) Haga notar rendimientos en el

trabajo en los cuales va a enfocar los logros de estas responsabilidades al final del año. Por favor recuerde que

debe hacer un ajuste si estas responsabilidades cambian drásticamente durante el año.

E.g. Responsbilidad: Organizar y mantener los ficheros a fin de tenerlos al día y de fácil acceso.

Objetivo: Cambiar el material del fichero de los parroquianos.

Entrar en la computadora la información de los ficheros de los parroquianos.

Responsabilidad

Objetivo(s) de rendimiento

Responsabilidad

Objetivo(s) de rendimiento

Responsabilidad

Objetivo(s) de rendimiento

Meta de rendimiento

SECTION IV

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY

FOR PRIESTS

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS: STEPS

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS

Purposes:

A. Growth in ministry

 To affirm personal and ministerial strengths and areas of recent growth

 To identify areas for future personal and ministerial growth

 To follow through on a plan (long and short range) for personal and ministerial growth,

which builds on strengths and addresses growth areas identified through assessment

feedback

B. Accountability for ministry

 To provide a regular means of accountability for ministry and ministerial development

Process:

Steps for Annual Review Suggested

Timeline

Groundwork

 The priest discusses with his reviewer his ministry agreement and clarifies his

responsibilities and ministerial goals for the upcoming year, including at least

one developmental goal. (Priests who have recently experienced a periodic

review or traditional first or second term pastor review are encouraged to

consider that feedback in preparing goals.)

 He records his ministry goals on the Annual Ministry Plan.

 He plans to meet with his reviewer(s) as needed throughout the year and in

August for the annual review meeting.

 He may also identify the format he will use for his review. He may use only the

Review Summary (see next page) or more detailed alternate forms A or B

which can also be found in Archdiocesan Resources for Performance Review

and Planning available on the Archdiocesan website (www.archdiocese-

chgo.org) or from the Office of Ministerial Evaluation.

August/

September

Periodic review of progress in accomplishing responsibilities and goals

On-going

Review

 The priest schedules a review meeting with his reviewer.

 He assesses his ministry and presents it to his reviewer.

 They meet to discuss the assessment and complete a review summary, adjust

the ministry agreement, if necessary, and set goals for the coming year.

 Note: He may also complete a personal reflection at this time and discuss this

with a spiritual director or another person of his choosing.

August

The Annual Review of Performance of Ministry Summary

 Notes highlights of review discussion: accomplishments, challenges and

recommendations.

 Contains necessary signatures.

 Retention is yet to be determined.

August

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS: MINISTRY PLAN

ANNUAL MINISTRY PLAN

Name _________________________________________________________ Date ______________________

After discussing with your reviewer your ministry agreement/position responsibilities and ministry over the past

year, and your most recent Periodic Review feedback or previous goals if applicable, formulate your ministry

goals for the coming year. Retain a copy of the plan for next year’s review. Be sure to include goal(s) for

ministerial development.

Priest’s Signature______________________________________ Date _____________________

Reviewer’s Signature___________________________________ Date _____________________

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS: REVIEW SUMMARY

SUMMARY: ANNUAL REVIEW FOR PRIESTS

Name __________________________________________________________ Date ______________________

After discussing the previous year’s ministry with your reviewer using one of the forms in Resources for

Performance Management with Parish Personnel or another format of your choice, summarize the key

conclusions of the review discussion. Note major accomplishments and recommendations. Sign this form and

obtain your reviewer’s signature. Keep a copy for your personal records and put the original in the local personnel

file. Prepare a Ministry plan for the coming year.

Priest’s Signature______________________________________ Date _____________________

Reviewer’s Signature___________________________________ Date _____________________

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS: ALTERNATE FORM A

Reviewer Copy

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS

Name of Priest Title

Name of Reviewer

Date

4 With this form you should have received a copy of the role description and yearly objectives/goals of

the priest whom you are reviewing. Using these materials, reflect on the following questions in

preparation for a review meeting.

4 During the meeting discuss your observations and determine future objectives.

4 Record conclusions from the discussion and goals for the coming year on the Summary: Annual

Review for Priests form (preceding).

1. How has Father fulfilled his responsibilities as articulated in the role description and objectives?

Note specific examples.

2. How has Father enriched himself spiritually, professionally and personally in the past year?

3. How well do his talents, gifts, and skills match the needs of this parish/agency/ organization?

Be specific.

4. How does he employ planning skills to:

Articulate the vision?

Set long and short range goals?

Implement the goals?

Evaluate?

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS: ALTERNATE FORM A

5. How does he relate to other members of the staff and to parishioners/constituency? How does he

collaborate and communicate with others?

6. How has he demonstrated:

Accountability?

Responsibility?

Dependability?

Flexibility?

7. What have been his major accomplishments this past year?

8. How could he enhance or improve his ability to minister?

9. What assistance/support/resources would strengthen this ministry?

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS: ALTERNATE FORM A

Priest Copy

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS

Name of Priest

Title

Name of Reviewer

Date

4Give the reviewer a copy of this form and a copy of your role description and yearly goals/objectives

to the person(s) whom you have selected as a reviewer(s).

4 Reflect on the following questions in preparation for the review meeting.

4 During the meeting discuss your observations and formulate future goals.

4 Record conclusions and goals for the coming year on the Summary: Annual Review for Priests

form (preceding).

1. How have I fulfilled my responsibilities as articulated in my role description and objectives? (Refer to

your role description and yearly objectives/goals established at the beginning of the review year.

Note specific examples.)

2. How have I enriched myself spiritually, professionally and personally in the past year?

3. How well do my talents, gifts, and skills match the needs of this parish/agency/ organization? Be

specific.

4. How well do I employ planning skills to:

Articulate the vision?

Set long and short range goals?

Implement the goals?

Evaluate?

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS: ALTERNATE FORM A

5. How

do I relate to other members of the staff and to parishioners/constituency? How do I collaborate

and communicate with others?

6. How have I demonstrated:

Accountability?

Responsibility?

Dependability?

Flexibility?

7. What have been my major accomplishments this past year?

8. How could I enhance or improve my ability to minister?

10. What assistance/support/resources would strengthen this ministry?

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS: ALTERNATE FORM B

REVIEW OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS

Name

Date

Place of Ministry (Parish, Agency, etc.

Reviewer

Position

REVIEW OF KEY RESPONSIBILITIES

In each section below write a key responsibility or an objective/goal from the past year. (Make additional

copies of page 2 if necessary). Add your self-assessment of how the responsibility was fulfilled indicating what

was accomplished, as well as desired improvements. Ratings are optional. See page 85 for additional

information on rating.

a. Responsibility/Goal:

d. Rating:

b. Self Assessment:

c. Reviewer Assessment:

a. Responsibility/Goal:

d. Rating:

b. Self Assessment:

c. Reviewer Assessment:

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS: ALTERNATE FORM B

(Please duplicate this page if necessary.)

a. Responsibility/Goal:

d. Rating:

b. Self Assessment:

c. Reviewer Assessment:

a. Responsibility/Goal:

d. Rating:

b. Self Assessment:

c. Reviewer Assessment:

a. Responsibility/Goal:

d. Rating:

b. Self Assessment:

c. Reviewer Assessment:

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS: ALTERNATE FORM B

ASSESSMENT OF KEY COMPETENCIES AND SKILLS

Indicate your self-assessment of the following skills and competencies.

SKILL/ COMPETENCY SELF ASSESSMENT RATING

1. Presiding

Presides at liturgy with reverence,

dignity and prayerfulness in a

manner which is sensitive to the

people and which encourages

participation.

2. Preaching

Preaches the Gospel message in a

way that is consistent with a sound

understanding of Scripture and

which addresses the life

experience of the listeners.

3. Knowledge

Demonstrates an in-depth grasp of

Church teaching, biblical and

pastoral theology and a working

knowledge of Canon Law and

Church history.

4. Communication

Demonstrates an ability to speak

and write clearly, to teach

effectively, to listen actively and to

communicate essential information

effectively.

5. Relating

Relates to others in a professional,

pastoral and collaborative manner.

6. Leadership

Demonstrates leadership and

management skills of planning,

administration and coordination of

personnel.

7. Mission

Promotes the vision and mission of

the parish/ agency/ organization.

7. Development

Participates in an ongoing process

of spiritual, personal and

ministerial development.

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS: ALTERNATE FORM B

REVIEW OF PROFESSIONAL/MINISTERIAL DEVELOPMENT GOAL

 Note your professional/ministerial development goal from the previous year. Write your self-

assessment.

a. Professional Development Goal:

d. Rating:

b. Self Assessment:

c. Reviewer Assessment:

Note any additional comments.

Self: Reviewer:

 Copy this form for your reviewer(s) to add his/her/their assessment(s).

 During the review meeting, discuss the assessments and determine future objectives. (If desired,

determine a rating according to the following scale: (5) Far exceeds expectations; (4) Exceeds

expectations; (3) Meets expectations; (2) Needs improvement; (1) Does not meet expectations.)

 After discussing the content of this form with your reviewer(s), summarize the key conclusions and

future goals and objectives on the Annual Review for Priests Summary form (preceding section).

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS: PERSONAL REFLECTION

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PRIESTLY MINISTRY

PERSONAL REFLECTION

The following form is supplemental to Alternate A or B. After reflecting and noting significant changes or

developments regarding the topics below, you may wish to discuss your reflections with your spiritual

director, a close friend, or some other person who can offer additional insight.

1. Continuing Education and Development

(formal/informal education, professional reading, enrichment through the arts: novels, poetry, music,

theater, art galleries, museums, etc., hobbies)

2. Relationships

Family

(major family events and their impact on your life)

Other Priests

(changes in your relationships with other priests)

Other Relationships

(changes in your relationships with other people)

3. Spiritual Development

(significant events in your spiritual journey in the past year)

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MINISTRY FOR PRIESTS: PERSONNEL REFLECTION

4. Health

(significant changes in your health or in how you care for yourself; time for vacation, days off,

recreation)

5. Ministry Assignment

(significant changes in how you experience your current ministry assignment and its impact on your

life)

(changes in other ministries in which you are or have been engaged)

6. Living Situation

(changes in your lifestyle and/or living situation; impact of the changes)

7. Personal Goal Setting

(progress in the personal goals/resolutions)

8. Adjusted/New Resolutions/Goals

(adjustments in these goals in light of progress and of significant changes noted above)