1) Applicant does not provide credible testimony on
her manner, place, or time of last arrival.
Applicant does, however, provide credible
documentary and/or credible testimonial
evidence of being in Taiwan seven months
before the filing date. Because applicant credibly
testified that she was in Taiwan seven months
before filing for asylum and therefore must have
last entered the United States less than 12
months before the filing date, she has satisfied
her evidentiary burden of proving with clear and
convincing evidence that the application was
filed within one year of her last arrival.
Note #1: Asylum officers should not assume that
the absence of detailed and consistent testimony
regarding the specifics of an applicant’s arrival
indicate an attempt to circumvent the filing
deadline requirements. There may be other
reasons an applicant fails to provide details about
his or her arrival, such as the desire to protect the
identity of the person whose passport an
applicant used, language confusion, fear of
smugglers, or the natural fading of memory over
time. The asylum officer should inquire into the
reasons an applicant fails to provide detailed
information about his or her arrival and carefully
consider the response based on the totality of the
circumstances. If an applicant presents vague or
inconsistent testimony about the date, manner,
and place of last entry, the applicant may
nonetheless be able to establish by clear and
convincing evidence that he or she was outside
the United States less than one year prior to the
filing date and thus met the one-year filing
requirement.