Access to Justice
New Rules for Landlords
It is important to realize that changes may occur in this area of law. is information is not intended to be
legal advice regarding your particular problem, and it is not intended to replace the work of an attorney.
Does SB 608 apply to my tenancy?
e provisions of SB 608 apply:
1. To any xed-term tenancy entered into or renewed aer February 27, 2019;
2. To the termination of any month-to-month tenancy; and
3. To all rent increase notices.
How do I send a termination notice to a tenant?
SB 608 did not change how termination notices are issued. Any termination notice must be in writing (paper, not
email or text) and can be served by personal hand-to-hand delivery or rst-class mail (add three additional days
to any notice period if using rst-class mail). Some rental agreements allow the use of “post and mail,” but only if
certain necessary information is contained within the rental agreement and other conditions are met.
Can I terminate a month-to-month tenancy under SB 608?
In most jurisdictions, a landlord can issue a written 30-day “no cause” eviction to month-to-month tenants during
the rst year of occupancy. In other jurisdictions, including Portland and Milwaukie, 90 days notice are required
instead of 30 days. “First year of occupancy” means the rst year of any tenant’s residency at a rental property with
a month-to-month rental agreement.
Aer the rst year of occupancy, a landlord with month-to-month tenants can issue a 90-day termination notice
if the landlord has a “qualifying landlord reason.” (See below for a discussion of qualifying landlord reasons.) If a
landlord has a qualifying landlord reason justifying a 90-day termination notice, the landlord must:
1. Issue a termination notice that states the reason for the termination and supporting facts allowing
termination;
2. State the rental agreement will terminate on a specied date at least 90 days later; and
3. Pay the tenant one month’s rent when the written termination notice is issued, UNLESS the landlord
has an ownership interest in four or fewer residential dwelling units in Oregon. Ownership interest
includes being sole owner of a premises, a co-owner of a premises, or an owner of an LLC that owns
real property.
A landlord can also issue a “no cause” termination notice aer the rst year of occupancy if the landlord’s primary
residence is in the same building or on the same premises as the tenant, and the building or premises only has one
or two dwelling units. is could occur if a tenant lives in an ADU on the premises. In most jurisdictions this is a
60-day notice; in others, including Portland and Milwaukie, a 90-day notice is required.
Additionally, a landlord can issue a “no cause” termination notice aer the rst year of occupancy if:
1. e landlord’s primary residence is in the same building or on the same premises as the tenant;
2. e building or premises only has one or two dwelling units;
3. e landlord has accepted an oer to sell a dwelling unit separately from any other unit;
4. e buyer is a person who intends in good faith to occupy the unit as the buyers primary residence; and
5. Within 120 days aer accepting the purchase oer, the landlord provides the tenant with written notice of
termination with a specic termination date and written evidence of the oer to purchase the dwelling unit.
e time period for this type of notice is 30 days in most jurisdictions; it is 90 days in Milwaukie and Portland.
Finally, a landlord can issue a written “for cause” termination notice at any time during the tenancy. Reasons for
terminating a tenancy “for cause” include, but are not limited to: material breach of the rental agreement or ORS
90.325 (ORS 90.392), failure to pay rent (ORS 90.394) and outrageous conduct by a tenant (ORS 90.396). Each of
these “for cause” terminations has its own notice requirements.
Can I terminate a fixed-term tenancy under SB 608?
A landlord can issue a written “for cause” termination notice at any time during this type of tenancy for the same
reasons as a month-to-month tenancy, including the statutory provisions mentioned in the last paragraph above.
For a xed-term tenancy with an expiration date within the rst year of occupancy, the landlord may terminate the
tenancy at its expiration without cause by giving the tenant 30 days* written notice. at means 30 days prior to the
ending date of the xed term, or 30 days prior to the date designated in the notice for the termination of the tenancy,
whichever is later. (*90 days written notice in certain jurisdictions, including Portland and Milwaukie)
For a xed-term tenancy with an expiration date aer the rst year of occupancy, the xed-term tenancy
automatically becomes a month-to-month tenancy at its expiration unless:
1. e landlord and tenant agree to a new xed-term tenancy;
2. e tenant gives 30-day written notice of termination; or
3. e landlord has a “qualifying landlord reason” to issue a 90-day termination notice.
A landlord may terminate a xed-term tenancy at its expiration without cause by giving the tenant notice not less
than 30 days prior to the expiration date for the xed term, or 30 days prior to the date designated in the notice
for the termination of the tenancy, whichever is later (90 days in Portland or Milwaukie), if:
1. e landlord resides in the same building or on the same premises as the tenant; and
2. e building or the property has one or two dwelling units.
ree Strikes Rule” — During a xed-term tenancy, a landlord can prevent a xed-term tenancy from
becoming a month-to-month tenancy if:
1. e tenant has committed three or more violations of the rental agreement within the preceding
12-month period;
2. e landlord has given the tenant a written warning notice at the time of each violation; and
3. e landlord issues written notice at least 90 days before the end date for the xed term or 90 days
before the termination date in the notice, whichever is later.
Each written warning notice must:
1. Specify the violation;
www.oregonstatebar.org |
www.oregon.gov/ohcs
2. State that the landlord may terminate the tenancy at the end of the xed term if there are
three violations within a 12-month period during the xed term; and
3. State that correcting the third or subsequent violation is not a defense to eviction.
e 90-day notice of termination for a “ree Strikes Rule” termination must be in writing and:
1. State that the rental agreement will terminate upon the ending date for the xed term or upon
a designated date at least 90 days aer delivery of the notice, whichever is later;
2. Specify the reason for the termination and supporting facts; and
3. Be served to the tenant concurrent with or aer the third (or nal) written warning notice.
What are the “qualifying landlord reasons” under SB 608 when a landlord can issue
a 90-day termination notice?
e “qualifying landlord reasons” for termination are:
1. e landlord intends to demolish the dwelling unit within a reasonable time;
2. e landlord intends to convert the unit to a use other than residential use within a reasonable time;
3. e landlord intends to undertake repairs or renovations to the dwelling unit within a reasonable time
and:
a. e premises is currently unsafe or unt for occupancy; or
b. e dwelling unit will be unsafe or unt for occupancy during the repairs or renovations;
4. e landlord has accepted an oer to sell a dwelling unit separately from any other unit and:
a. e buyer is a person who intends in good faith to occupy the unit as the buyers primary
residence; and
b. Within 120 days aer accepting the purchase oer, the landlord provides the tenant with
written notice of termination with a specic termination date and written evidence of the
oer to purchase the dwelling unit.
5. e landlord intends:
a. For the landlord or a member of the landlord’s immediate family to occupy the unit as a
primary residence; and
b. e landlord does not own a unit in the same building that is available for occupancy at
the same time that the tenant receives notice to terminate the tenancy.
How can I increase the rent under SB 608?
During any 12-month rolling period, most landlords may not increase the existing rent by more than
7 percent plus the Consumer Price Index (CPI). e Oregon Department of Administrative Services will
publish the maximum annual rent increase allowed. e maximum rent increase for 2023 is 14.6 %.
A landlord is not subject to this limitation on rent increases if:
1. e rst certicate of occupancy for the dwelling unit was issued less than 15 years before the rent
increase notice; or
2. e dwelling unit is regulated or certied as aordable housing by a federal, state or local government
and the change in rent:
a. Does not increase the tenant’s portion of the rent; or
b. Is required by program eligibility requirements or by a change in the tenant’s income.
A rent increase notice must be in writing and state:
1. e amount of the rent increase;
2. e amount of the new rent;
3. e date on which the increase becomes eective; and
www.oregonstatebar.org |
www.oregon.gov/ohcs
Produced by the Oregon State Bar
Additional Landlord and Tenant Law
www.oregonstatebar.org
With support from the Oregon Housing and
Community Services Department
www.oregon.gov/ohcs
4. If the increase is more than 7 percent + CPI, the facts supporting why the landlord is not subject to
the rent increase limitation.
A landlord who terminates a tenancy with a “no cause” termination notice during the first year of occupancy
may not increase rent for the next tenancy by more than the maximum annual rent increase, which is 14.6
% for 2023. This applies with a “no cause” termination notice under ORS 90.427 (3) (termination of month-
to-month tenancy during first year) or ORS 90.427 (4) (termination of fixed-term tenancy to prevent it from
becoming month-to-month).
How does HB 2001 impact my tenancy and terminations of that tenancy?
HB 2001 was enacted on March 29, 2023, and became immediately eective on passage.
HB 2001 redenes the statutory meaning of nonpayment, extends the time given for nonpayment termination
notices (back to 10/13 days as during COVID protections), requires additional information and disclosures
in nonpayment termination notices and summons, and also extends the eviction timelines, which will delay
resolution of FEDs (evictions). ere is no repeal date included within HB 2001.
Specically, HB 2001 does the following:
1. Eliminates 72-hour nonpayment of rent termination notices, and changes the timeline to 10 days. It also
eliminates 144-hour nonpayment of rent termination notices, and changes that timeline to 13 days. is
does not include 3 additional days for rst class mailing.
2. Requires a landlord to deliver the attached NOTICE RE: EVICTION FOR NONPAYMENT OF RENT.
is notice must be included with a 10-day nonpayment of rent termination notice, 13-day nonpayment
of rent termination notice, or 30-day for-cause termination notice for nonpayment. An FED is subject to
court dismissal if landlord fails to deliver this Notice.
3. Requires the Court to dismiss any FED if (a) a tenant tenders rental assistance or payment (or causes
rental assistance or payment to be tendered by a 3rd party) that covers the nonpayment amount owed
under the termination notice anytime prior to an FED Stipulated Agreement or FED judgment, or
(b) the landlord causes the tenant to not tender rent, including as a result of the landlord’s failure to
reasonably participate with a rental assistance program. A landlord must allow a tenant to make payment
during the FED.
4. Changes the denition of ‘nonpayment’ to mean the nonpayment of a payment that is due to a landlord
for rent, late charges, utility or service charges, or any other charge or fee as described in the rental
agreement or ORS 90.140. However, “nonpayment” does not include payments owed by a tenant for
damages to the premises.
5. Extends scheduling FED rst appearance dates and trial dates for nonpayment FEDs.
6. Requires a landlord to attest (via a Declaration or Adavit) that the landlord does not have knowledge
that the tenant has relinquished possession of the premises to landlord, and that landlord reasonably
believes that the tenant remains in possession of the premises. Landlords who do not provide this
testimony cannot get a default judgment against tenants who fail to appear at a rst appearance hearing.
June 2023