56
Social Procurement | State of Practice
6.3 Monitoring + Evaluation
Monitoring contracts to ensure the social value requirements are being met is
equally important as having the initial requirement.
222
Monitoring should be
done consistently throughout the lifetime of the contract.
223
The monitoring
and evaluation of contracts is seen by many as the most dicult aspect of social
procurement.
224
There is often a perception that trying to understand social value
will involve a high demand on resources to collect data.
225
How an organization decides to measure social procurement will be a determinant
of its success. Two approaches to measurement are outcome based and impact
based.
226
An outcome based approach uses short term quantiable indicators that
are simple in nature, for example, number of persons employed from a specic
group. Impact based approaches look at long term, often qualitative, complex
indicators, for example, the eect that local procurement has on reducing the
poverty rate. While it is easy to see the direct results of purchasing a lower priced
good, the impact of creating social value can be far reaching, but harder to
quantify.
227
At the same time, attempting to measure impacts for a specic contract
may be overly complex and expensive, unless there is a strategic reason.
228
Contract monitoring should not create a resource burden that outweighs the
potential social benets.
229
The impacts of social procurement are hard to
articulate through one measurable target (i.e. increased employment), and even
more so within a specic contract.
230
For this reason, organizations will generally
monitor outcomes as they are less costly and more tangible, but must make sure
that by focusing on outputs they do not lose sight of the impacts sought.
231
222 Halloran, Deirdre. Community Action Network. A Primer on the Use of Social Clauses in Ireland. 2015.
Retrieved from: http://www.canaction.ie/can_15/www/live_site/downloads/can_-_primer_social_clauses_web_
in_ireland_2015.pdf ?gi_sn=55b220918281c%7C0
223 Social Procurement Australasia. Insights Into Social Procurement: From Policy to Practice. 2015 Retrieved
from: http://socialprocurementaustralasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/SPA-Insights-From-Policy-to-Prac-
tice-2015_FINAL.pdf
224 Halloran D. The Social Value in Social Clauses: Methods of Measuring and Evaluation in Social Procure-
ment. Global Public Procurement Theories and Practices. Florida: Springer Publishing 39-58 Eds. Khi Thai. 2017
225 Hebb, Tessa, and Hachigian, Heather. Social Value Procurement Measurement and Evaluation. Carleton
Centre for Community Innovation 2017. Retrieved from: https://carleton.ca/3ci/wpcontent/uploads/SVP-Eval-
uation_Final_April_13_2017.pdf
226 ibid.
227 State Government of Victoria (Australia). Social Procurement: A Guide for Victorian Local Government.
2010.
228 Social Procurement Action Group (SPAG). Social Procurement in New South Wales: A Guide to Achiev-
ing Social Value Through Public Sector Procurement. 2012.
229 Mowat Centre and Atkinson Foundation. Community Benets and Social Procurement Policies: A Jurisdic-
tional Review. 2016. Retrieved from: http://atkinsonfoundation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/mowat-af_cb-
spp_review_nal.pdf
230 Social Traders. Measuring the Impact of Social Procurement: A New Approach. 2013. Retrieved from:
http://socialprocurementaustralasia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Burkett-McNeill_Social-Traders_fram-
ing-the-value-question-in-social-procurement-Part-1.pdf
231 Hebb, Tessa, and Hachigian, Heather. Social Value Procurement Measurement and Evaluation. Carleton
Centre for Community Innovation 2017. Retrieved from: https://carleton.ca/3ci/wpcontent/uploads/SVP-Eval-
uation_Final_April_13_2017.pdf
While it is easy to see
the direct results of
purchasing a lower
priced good, the
impact of creating
social value can be far
reaching, but harder to
analytically quantify